# | Title | Journal | Year | Citations |
---|
1 | Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping | Scientometrics | 2010 | 8,777 |
2 | From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities | Scientific Reports | 2019 | 2,249 |
3 | Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics | Nature | 2015 | 1,465 |
4 | A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks | Journal of Informetrics | 2010 | 1,238 |
5 | Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer | Scientometrics | 2017 | 1,133 |
6 | Visualizing Bibliometric Networks | | 2014 | 1,053 |
7 | A review of the literature on citation impact indicators | Journal of Informetrics | 2016 | 743 |
8 | A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection | European Physical Journal B | 2013 | 738 |
9 | Science of science | Science | 2018 | 701 |
10 | Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting | Journal of Informetrics | 2016 | 664 |
11 | Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods | Scientometrics | 2005 | 567 |
12 | How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures | Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 2009 | 530 |
13 | Sleeping Beauties in science | Scientometrics | 2004 | 408 |
14 | New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications | Scientometrics | 1995 | 396 |
15 | A new methodology for constructing a publication‐level classification system of science | Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 2012 | 391 |
16 | Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises | Scientometrics | 1996 | 294 |
17 | Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations | Journal of Informetrics | 2011 | 290 |
18 | The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation | Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 2012 | 284 |
19 | Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic | Quantitative Science Studies | 2021 | 252 |
20 | The measurement of international scientific collaboration | Scientometrics | 1993 | 246 |
21 | The inconsistency of the h‐index | Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 2012 | 244 |
22 | Meta-assessment of bias in science | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2017 | 238 |
23 | Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity | Scientometrics | 2008 | 233 |
24 | Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus | Journal of Informetrics | 2016 | 219 |
25 | Automatic term identification for bibliometric mapping | Scientometrics | 2010 | 191 |
26 | Impact factors can mislead | Nature | 1996 | 176 |
27 | Citation Analysis May Severely Underestimate the Impact of Clinical Research as Compared to Basic Research | PLoS ONE | 2013 | 176 |
28 | Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis | Scientometrics | 2011 | 175 |
29 | Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method | Journal of Informetrics | 2015 | 171 |
30 | Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis | Scientometrics | 1991 | 152 |
31 | Scientometrics: State-of-the-art | Scientometrics | 1997 | 151 |
32 | Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator | Journal of Informetrics | 2013 | 141 |
33 | Scientific workflows for bibliometrics | Scientometrics | 2016 | 125 |
34 | A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: Co-classification analysis of energy research | Research Policy | 1992 | 122 |
35 | Scientists have most impact when they're free to move | Nature | 2017 | 120 |
36 | On the calculation of percentile‐based bibliometric indicators | Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 2013 | 111 |
37 | Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics | Ethics and Information Technology | 2011 | 110 |
38 | On Growth, Ageing, and Fractal Differentiation of Science | Scientometrics | 2000 | 103 |
39 | F1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations | Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 2014 | 101 |
40 | Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison | Scientometrics | 2013 | 96 |
41 | A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators | Journal of Informetrics | 2013 | 95 |
42 | Career satisfaction of postdoctoral researchers in relation to their expectations for the future | Higher Education | 2016 | 93 |
43 | The neural net of neural network research | Scientometrics | 1993 | 91 |
44 | Clustering Scientific Publications Based on Citation Relations: A Systematic Comparison of Different Methods | PLoS ONE | 2016 | 89 |
45 | Mapping patient safety: a large-scale literature review using bibliometric visualisation techniques | BMJ Open | 2014 | 86 |
46 | Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff | Journal of Informetrics | 2010 | 79 |
47 | Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators: Research group indicator distributions and correlations | Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology | 2006 | 69 |
48 | Translating upwards: linking the neural and social sciences via neuroeconomics | Nature Reviews Neuroscience | 2012 | 69 |
49 | Advanced bibliometric methods for the evaluation of universities | Scientometrics | 1999 | 67 |
50 | A Large-Scale Analysis of Impact Factor Biased Journal Self-Citations | PLoS ONE | 2016 | 63 |