# | Title | Journal | Year | Citations |
---|
1 | Reporting the limits of detection and quantification for environmental DNA assays | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 269 |
2 | The detection of aquatic macroorganisms using environmental DNA analysis—A review of methods for collection, extraction, and detection | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 204 |
3 | Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 165 |
4 | Environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool for assessing fish biomass: A review of approaches and future considerations for resource surveys | Environmental DNA | 2022 | 145 |
5 | DNA metabarcoding in diet studies: Unveiling ecological aspects in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 141 |
6 | microDecon: A highly accurate read‐subtraction tool for the post‐sequencing removal of contamination in metabarcoding studies | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 115 |
7 | Temporal and spatial variation in distribution of fish environmental DNA in England’s largest lake | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 110 |
8 | Environmental DNA shedding and decay rates from diverse animal forms and thermal regimes | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 105 |
9 | An illustrated manual for environmental DNA research: Water sampling guidelines and experimental protocols | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 102 |
10 | A validation scale to determine the readiness of environmental DNA assays for routine species monitoring | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 102 |
11 | Maximizing fish detection with eDNA metabarcoding | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 99 |
12 | Methodological trends and perspectives of animal dietary studies by noninvasive fecal DNA metabarcoding | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 83 |
13 | A performance evaluation of targeted eDNA and eDNA metabarcoding analyses for freshwater fishes | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 79 |
14 | Sedimentary eDNA provides different information on timescale and fish species composition compared with aqueous eDNA | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 77 |
15 | A system for rapid eDNA detection of aquatic invasive species | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 75 |
16 | Water stratification in the marine biome restricts vertical environmental DNA (eDNA) signal dispersal | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 74 |
17 | Improved freshwater macroinvertebrate detection from environmental DNA through minimized nontarget amplification | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 68 |
18 | Comparison of fish detections, community diversity, and relative abundance using environmental DNA metabarcoding and traditional gears | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 65 |
19 | Environmental DNA metabarcoding for biodiversity monitoring of a highly diverse tropical fish community in a coral reef lagoon: Estimation of species richness and detection of habitat segregation | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 65 |
20 | Assessing different components of diversity across a river network using eDNA | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 64 |
21 | Downstream transport and seasonal variation in freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) eDNA concentration | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 64 |
22 | Application of eDNA as a tool for assessing fish population abundance | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 62 |
23 | Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding and underwater visual census to monitor tropical reef fishes | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 61 |
24 | Comparing environmental metabarcoding and trawling survey of demersal fish communities in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 58 |
25 | The need for robust qPCR‐based eDNA detection assays in environmental monitoring and species inventories | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 57 |
26 | Improved detection of rare, endangered and invasive trout in using a new large‐volume sampling method for eDNA capture | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 53 |
27 | Estimating shedding and decay rates of environmental nuclear DNA with relation to water temperature and biomass | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 52 |
28 | Influence of preservation methods, sample medium and sampling time on eDNA recovery in a neotropical river | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 51 |
29 | Comparing eDNA metabarcoding and species collection for documenting Arctic metazoan biodiversity | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 51 |
30 | Messenger RNA typing of environmental RNA (eRNA): A case study on zebrafish tank water with perspectives for the future development of eRNA analysis on aquatic vertebrates | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 51 |
31 | Using environmental DNA for biomonitoring of freshwater fish communities: Comparison with established gillnet surveys in a boreal hydroelectric impoundment | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 50 |
32 | The future of biodiversity monitoring and conservation utilizing environmental DNA | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 49 |
33 | Development and evaluation of fish eDNA metabarcoding assays facilitate the detection of cryptic seahorse taxa (family: Syngnathidae) | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 48 |
34 | Evaluating intraspecific genetic diversity using environmental DNA and denoising approach: A case study using tank water | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 47 |
35 | Caged fish experiment and hydrodynamic bidimensional modeling highlight the importance to consider 2D dispersion in fluvial environmental DNA studies | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 47 |
36 | Increased eDNA detection sensitivity using a novel high‐volume water sampling method | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 47 |
37 | Linking the state of environmental DNA to its application for biomonitoring and stock assessment: Targeting mitochondrial/nuclear genes, and different DNA fragment lengths and particle sizes | Environmental DNA | 2022 | 46 |
38 | Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding for the monitoring of terrestrial insects—A proof of concept from the field | Environmental DNA | 2022 | 45 |
39 | Identifying spawning events in fish by observing a spike in environmental DNA concentration after spawning | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 41 |
40 | Rapid assessment of coral cover from environmental DNA in Hawai'i | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 40 |
41 | How to design optimal eDNA sampling strategies for biomonitoring in river networks | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 40 |
42 | Analyzing airborne environmental DNA: A comparison of extraction methods, primer type, and trap type on the ability to detect airborne eDNA from terrestrial plant communities | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 38 |
43 | Testing the performance of environmental DNA metabarcoding for surveying highly diverse tropical fish communities: A case study from Lake Tanganyika | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 38 |
44 | Environmental conditions influence eDNA particle size distribution in aquatic systems | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 38 |
45 | Comparing the performance of 12S mitochondrial primers for fish environmental DNA across ecosystems | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 38 |
46 | Making environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity records globally accessible | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 38 |
47 | 60 specific eDNA qPCR assays to detect invasive, threatened, and exploited freshwater vertebrates and invertebrates in Eastern Canada | Environmental DNA | 2020 | 37 |
48 | One size does not fit all: Tuning eDNA protocols for high‐ and low‐turbidity water sampling | Environmental DNA | 2022 | 37 |
49 | What do you mean by false positive? | Environmental DNA | 2021 | 36 |
50 | A simplified DNA extraction protocol for unsorted bulk arthropod samples that maintains exoskeletal integrity | Environmental DNA | 2019 | 34 |