1.5(top 50%)
impact factor
484(top 50%)
papers
5.8K(top 20%)
citations
33(top 20%)
h-index
1.6(top 50%)
extended IF
489
all documents
7.2K
doc citations
64(top 20%)
g-index

Top Articles

#TitleJournalYearCitations
1“Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondentsResearch and Politics2015577
2Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology?Research and Politics2015469
3Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondentsResearch and Politics2019452
4Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey dataResearch and Politics2017367
5Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social mediaResearch and Politics2019313
6Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population: Political attitudes and demographics of British social media usersResearch and Politics2017205
7Explaining the end of Spanish exceptionalism and electoral support for VoxResearch and Politics2019109
8How populism and conservative media fuel conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 and what it means for COVID-19 behaviorsResearch and Politics202192
9Refugees welcome? A dataset on anti-refugee violence in GermanyResearch and Politics201681
10Understanding state preferences with text as data: Introducing the UN General Debate corpusResearch and Politics201780
11Politicians in the line of fire: Incivility and the treatment of women on social mediaResearch and Politics201978
12Militarization and police violence: The case of the 1033 programResearch and Politics201776
13Pruning the news feed: Unfriending and unfollowing political content on social mediaResearch and Politics201673
14The consequences of political innumeracyResearch and Politics201462
15The “losers of automation”: A reservoir of votes for the radical right?Research and Politics201962
16Checking how fact-checkers checkResearch and Politics201861
17Are public opinion polls self-fulfilling prophecies?Research and Politics201457
18Are coups good for democracy?Research and Politics201657
19Who wrote the rules for the Trans-Pacific Partnership?Research and Politics201657
20The limitations of the backfire effectResearch and Politics201757
21Using machine-coded event data for the micro-level study of political violenceResearch and Politics201456
22The partisan contours of conspiracy theory beliefsResearch and Politics201756
23The Manifesto Corpus: A new resource for research on political parties and quantitative text analysisResearch and Politics201652
24Welfare migration? Free movement of EU citizens and access to social benefitsResearch and Politics201450
25Skipping politics: Measuring avoidance of political content in social mediaResearch and Politics201745
26The corrosive effect of corruption on trust in politicians: Evidence from a natural experimentResearch and Politics201745
27A note on the perverse effects of actively open-minded thinking on climate-change polarizationResearch and Politics201644
28How negative partisanship affects voting behavior in Europe: Evidence from an analysis of 17 European multi-party systems with proportional votingResearch and Politics201744
29Boycotts, buycotts, and political consumerism in AmericaResearch and Politics201744
30Are Muslim countries more prone to violence?Research and Politics201642
31Populist referendum: Was ‘Brexit’ an expression of nativist and anti-elitist sentiment?Research and Politics201841
32A little bit of knowledge: Facebook’s News Feed and self-perceptions of knowledgeResearch and Politics201941
33Vote choice and legacies of violence: evidence from the 2014 Colombian presidential electionsResearch and Politics201540
34Public opinion and the politics of the killer robots debateResearch and Politics201640
35Shrinking and shouting: the political revolt of the declining middle in times of employment polarizationResearch and Politics201940
36Flying under the radar: A study of public attitudes towards unmanned aerial vehiclesResearch and Politics201438
37A partisan gap in the supply of female potential candidates in the United StatesResearch and Politics201436
38Do authoritarians vote for authoritarians? Evidence from Latin AmericaResearch and Politics201635
39Can presidential misinformation on climate change be corrected? Evidence from Internet and phone experimentsResearch and Politics201935
40Self-censorship of regime support in authoritarian states: Evidence from list experiments in ChinaResearch and Politics201935
41Can experience overcome stereotypes in times of terror threat?Research and Politics201733
42Conspiracy theories, election rigging, and support for democratic normsResearch and Politics202032
43Taking the time? Explaining effortful participation among low-cost online survey participantsResearch and Politics201831
44Did State Responses to Automation Matter for Voters?Research and Politics201931
45Distinction without a difference? An assessment of MTurk Worker typesResearch and Politics202031
46Demographic polarization and the rise of the far right: Brazil’s 2018 presidential electionResearch and Politics202131
47The conditional effect of conspiracy thinking on attitudes toward climate changeResearch and Politics201730
48Public support for Latin American presidents: The cyclical model in comparative perspectiveResearch and Politics201830
49A deeper look at interstate war data: Interstate War Data version 1.1Research and Politics201629
50Partisanship and political accountability in new democracies: Explaining compliance with formal rules and procedures in GhanaResearch and Politics201628