2.8(top 20%)
impact factor
914(top 20%)
papers
16.5K(top 10%)
citations
59(top 10%)
h-index
3.0(top 20%)
impact factor
1.1K
all documents
18.8K
doc citations
94(top 10%)
g-index

Top Articles

#TitleJournalYearCitations
1Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A reviewResearch Evaluation2014353
2Characteristics of highly cited papersResearch Evaluation2003352
3The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster?Research Evaluation2011334
4Introducing 'productive interactions' in social impact assessmentResearch Evaluation2011311
5What do we measure by co-authorships?Research Evaluation2002305
6Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature reviewResearch Evaluation2016276
7Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS databaseResearch Evaluation2008243
8Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurtureResearch Evaluation2006192
9Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluationsResearch Evaluation2004185
10Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary contextResearch Evaluation2016170
11Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: a method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science researchResearch Evaluation2008159
12Progressing research impact assessment: A ‘contributions’ approachResearch Evaluation2015159
13A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities researchResearch Evaluation2018138
14Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian universityResearch Evaluation2004137
15Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universitiesResearch Evaluation2004135
16Toward a methodological scheme for capturing societal effects of participatory sustainability researchResearch Evaluation2014134
17State of the art in assessing research impact: introduction to a special issueResearch Evaluation2011129
18Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practicesResearch Evaluation2012128
19Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventivenessResearch Evaluation2003122
20Modifying publication practices in response to funding formulasResearch Evaluation2003121
21Tracing 'productive interactions' to identify social impacts: an example from the social sciencesResearch Evaluation2011121
22The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflict of interests and interdisciplinary assessmentsResearch Evaluation2006119
23Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala UniversityResearch Evaluation2015115
24The UK Research Assessment Exercise: the evolution of a national research evaluation systemResearch Evaluation2007113
25Mapping a research agenda for the science of team scienceResearch Evaluation2011112
26Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impactResearch Evaluation2018111
27Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier: an empirical explorationResearch Evaluation2006110
28Ambiguity and conflict in the development of 'Third Mission' indicatorsResearch Evaluation2007108
29Patent and publication activities of German professors: an empirical assessment of their co-activityResearch Evaluation2007108
30Measuring and assessing researcher mobility from CV analysis: the case of the Ramón y Cajal programme in SpainResearch Evaluation2008105
31Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flowsResearch Evaluation2000104
32The impact of foresight on innovation policy-making: recent experiences and future perspectivesResearch Evaluation2010103
33Service marks as novel innovation indicatorResearch Evaluation2003101
34How interdisciplinary is a given body of research?Research Evaluation2008100
35The 'Payback Framework' explainedResearch Evaluation2011100
36Basic research and health: a reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical scienceResearch Evaluation200399
37Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication IndicatorResearch Evaluation201598
38Knowledge exchange: A comparison of policies, strategies, and funding incentives in English and Scottish higher educationResearch Evaluation201393
39Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center fundingResearch Evaluation200291
40Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impactsResearch Evaluation201190
41The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science--a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-9)Research Evaluation201289
42ASIRPA: A comprehensive theory-based approach to assessing the societal impacts of a research organizationResearch Evaluation201589
43Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research?Research Evaluation200587
44Thinking with indicators. Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciencesResearch Evaluation201785
45Understanding societal impact through productive interactions: ICT research as a caseResearch Evaluation201484
46Indicators as judgment devices: An empirical study of citizen bibliometrics in research evaluationResearch Evaluation201779
47Curriculum vitae method in science policy and research evaluation: the state-of-the-artResearch Evaluation200978
48Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciencesResearch Evaluation200977
49Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding systemResearch Evaluation201577
50Societal impact evaluation: Exploring evaluator perceptions of the characterization of impact under the REF2014: Table 1.Research Evaluation201577