# | Title | Journal | Year | Citations |
---|
1 | bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis | Journal of Informetrics | 2017 | 4,497 |
2 | A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks | Journal of Informetrics | 2010 | 1,238 |
3 | An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field | Journal of Informetrics | 2011 | 1,226 |
4 | Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories | Journal of Informetrics | 2018 | 892 |
5 | A review of the literature on citation impact indicators | Journal of Informetrics | 2016 | 743 |
6 | Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting | Journal of Informetrics | 2016 | 664 |
7 | h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields | Journal of Informetrics | 2009 | 625 |
8 | Sentiment analysis: A combined approach | Journal of Informetrics | 2009 | 544 |
9 | Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature | Journal of Informetrics | 2011 | 524 |
10 | Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals | Journal of Informetrics | 2010 | 501 |
11 | A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator | Journal of Informetrics | 2010 | 489 |
12 | CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks | Journal of Informetrics | 2014 | 421 |
13 | Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature | Journal of Informetrics | 2007 | 410 |
14 | Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics | Journal of Informetrics | 2014 | 378 |
15 | Finding scientific gems with Google’s PageRank algorithm | Journal of Informetrics | 2007 | 365 |
16 | The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level | Journal of Informetrics | 2007 | 345 |
17 | Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review | Journal of Informetrics | 2008 | 342 |
18 | Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures | Journal of Informetrics | 2011 | 342 |
19 | Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery | Journal of Informetrics | 2009 | 303 |
20 | Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks | Journal of Informetrics | 2011 | 298 |
21 | Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations | Journal of Informetrics | 2011 | 290 |
22 | Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks | Journal of Informetrics | 2012 | 284 |
23 | From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software | Journal of Informetrics | 2009 | 282 |
24 | International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group | Journal of Informetrics | 2008 | 273 |
25 | Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature | Journal of Informetrics | 2007 | 272 |
26 | A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator | Journal of Informetrics | 2012 | 252 |
27 | The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals | Journal of Informetrics | 2013 | 245 |
28 | Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature | Journal of Informetrics | 2017 | 240 |
29 | Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis | Journal of Informetrics | 2007 | 229 |
30 | A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants | Journal of Informetrics | 2011 | 227 |
31 | Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties | Journal of Informetrics | 2013 | 227 |
32 | Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program | Journal of Informetrics | 2009 | 223 |
33 | Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus | Journal of Informetrics | 2016 | 219 |
34 | Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations | Journal of Informetrics | 2011 | 201 |
35 | Lifting the crown—citation z-score | Journal of Informetrics | 2007 | 200 |
36 | Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools | Journal of Informetrics | 2018 | 195 |
37 | The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers | Journal of Informetrics | 2010 | 184 |
38 | What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? | Journal of Informetrics | 2012 | 181 |
39 | Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents | Journal of Informetrics | 2007 | 175 |
40 | A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals | Journal of Informetrics | 2007 | 172 |
41 | Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method | Journal of Informetrics | 2015 | 171 |
42 | A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts | Journal of Informetrics | 2008 | 166 |
43 | Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods | Journal of Informetrics | 2016 | 157 |
44 | Gender differences in research collaboration | Journal of Informetrics | 2013 | 151 |
45 | The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits | Journal of Informetrics | 2013 | 145 |
46 | An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing | Journal of Informetrics | 2012 | 142 |
47 | Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator | Journal of Informetrics | 2013 | 141 |
48 | Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance | Journal of Informetrics | 2010 | 138 |
49 | Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features | Journal of Informetrics | 2010 | 137 |
50 | Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position – A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff | Journal of Informetrics | 2015 | 137 |