7.9K(top 2%)
papers
24.2K(top 5%)
citations
41(top 5%)
h-index
64(top 5%)
g-index
5.3K
all documents
2.6K
doc citations

Top Articles

#TitleJournalYearCitations
1Business Ecosystems and the View from the FirmAntitrust Bulletin2006465
2Megamergers in Banking and the Use of Cost Efficiency as an Antitrust DefenseAntitrust Bulletin1992347
3Market Definition and the Analysis of Antitrust in BankingAntitrust Bulletin1997170
4Concentration versus Market Share: Which Determines Performance and Why Does it Matter?Antitrust Bulletin1982138
5MARKET DEFINITION IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS: THEORY AND PRACTICEJournal of Competition Law and Economics2014117
6The Problem of Geographic Market Delineation in Antimerger SuitsAntitrust Bulletin1973117
7SEARCH ENGINE COMPETITION WITH NETWORK EXTERNALITIESJournal of Competition Law and Economics2012106
8The Information Technology Ecosystem: Structure, Health, and PerformanceAntitrust Bulletin2006102
9DYNAMIC COMPETITION IN ANTITRUST LAWJournal of Competition Law and Economics2009102
10DEVELOPING COMPETITION LAW FOR COLLUSION BY AUTONOMOUS ARTIFICIAL AGENTS†Journal of Competition Law and Economics201899
11Copyright as Entry Policy: The Case of Digital DistributionAntitrust Bulletin200298
12The New Brandeis Movement: America’s Antimonopoly DebateJournal of European Competition Law and Practice201892
13Excessive Prices: Using Economics to Define Administrable Legal RulesJournal of Competition Law and Economics200590
14HOW MUCH COLLUSION? A META-ANALYSIS OF OLIGOPOLY EXPERIMENTSJournal of Competition Law and Economics200789
15Access and Interconnection Pricing: How Efficient is the “Efficient Component Pricing Rule”?Antitrust Bulletin199587
16Applying the Ecosystem Metaphor to EntrepreneurshipAntitrust Bulletin201683
17COMPETITION POLICY WITH OPTIMALLY DIFFERENTIATED RULES INSTEAD OF “PER SE RULES VS RULE OF REASON”Journal of Competition Law and Economics200677
18Market Definition in Banking: Recent EvidenceAntitrust Bulletin200276
19The Deterrent Effects of National Anticartel Laws: Evidence from the International Vitamins CartelAntitrust Bulletin200375
20Did Mandatory Unbundling Achieve Its Purpose? Empirical Evidence from Five CountriesJournal of Competition Law and Economics200574
21A CONSUMER-WELFARE APPROACH TO NETWORK NEUTRALITY REGULATION OF THE INTERNETJournal of Competition Law and Economics200674
22THE PRICE EFFECTS OF HORIZONTAL MERGERSJournal of Competition Law and Economics200773
23MERGER SIMULATION IN COMPETITION POLICY: A SURVEYJournal of Competition Law and Economics201073
24THE ANALYSIS OF MERGERS THAT INVOLVE MULTISIDED PLATFORM BUSINESSESJournal of Competition Law and Economics200867
25INNOVATION AND THE LIMITS OF ANTITRUSTJournal of Competition Law and Economics201067
26Global Value Chains and International CompetitionAntitrust Bulletin201167
27ALGORITHMS, MACHINE LEARNING, AND COLLUSIONJournal of Competition Law and Economics201867
28Why Regulated Firms should be Kept out of Unregulated Markets: Understanding the Divestiture in United States v. AT&TAntitrust Bulletin198766
29PATENT HOLDUP AND OLIGOPSONISTIC COLLUSION IN STANDARD-SETTING ORGANIZATIONSJournal of Competition Law and Economics200965
30ARE EXCESSIVE PRICES REALLY SELF-CORRECTING?Journal of Competition Law and Economics200964
31The Herfindahl Index in Theory and PracticeAntitrust Bulletin198563
32Why Price Fixers Should Go to PrisonAntitrust Bulletin198759
33The Antitrust Economics of Tying: A Farewell to per Se IllegalityAntitrust Bulletin200458
34DO PATENT HOLDUP AND ROYALTY STACKING LEAD TO SYSTEMATICALLY EXCESSIVE ROYALTIES?Journal of Competition Law and Economics200857
35DOES ECONOMICS PROVIDE A RELIABLE GUIDE TO REGULATING COMMODITY BUNDLING BY FIRMS? A SURVEY OF THE ECONOMIC LITERATUREJournal of Competition Law and Economics200556
36PRICE DISCRIMINATION UNDER EC COMPETITION LAW: ANOTHER ANTITRUST DOCTRINE IN SEARCH OF LIMITING PRINCIPLES?Journal of Competition Law and Economics200656
37Theories of vertical integration and their application to the electric utility industryAntitrust Bulletin198356
38The Worldwide Growth of Competition Law: An Empirical AnalysisAntitrust Bulletin199855
39The concurrent application of competition law and regulation: the case of margin squeeze abuses in the telecommunications sectorJournal of Competition Law and Economics200554
40A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO THE HYPOTHETICAL MONOPOLIST TEST FOR MARKET DEFINITIONJournal of Competition Law and Economics200853
41THE ANTITRUST CONSUMER WELFARE PARADOXJournal of Competition Law and Economics201153
42Free Riding and Conflict in Hybrid Shopping Environments: Implications for Retailers, Manufacturers, and RegulatorsAntitrust Bulletin201353
43What Do Interest Rate Data Say about the Geography of Retail Banking Markets?Antitrust Bulletin199953
44REVISITING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: INTERPRETING EBAY IN HIGH-TECH INDUSTRIES WITH NON-PRACTICING PATENT HOLDERSJournal of Competition Law and Economics200852
45Should Private Antitrust Enforcement Be Encouraged in Europe?World Competition200352
46AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF PATENT HOLDUPJournal of Competition Law and Economics201551
47COMPETITION LAW AROUND THE WORLD FROM 1889 TO 2010: THE COMPETITION LAW INDEXJournal of Competition Law and Economics201851
48Fines against Hard Core Cartels in Europe: The Myth of OverenforcementAntitrust Bulletin201150
49ASSESSING UNILATERAL MERGER EFFECTS IN A TWO-SIDED MARKET: AN APPLICATION TO THE DUTCH DAILY NEWSPAPER MARKETJournal of Competition Law and Economics201250
50DOES GOOGLE LEVERAGE MARKET POWER THROUGH TYING AND BUNDLING?Journal of Competition Law and Economics201550
51The Data Sharing Economy: On the Emergence of New IntermediariesIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law201949
52Competition and Antitrust: Toward a Productivity-Based Approach to Evaluating Mergers and Joint VenturesAntitrust Bulletin200148
53Originality in UK Copyright Law: The Old “Skill and Labour” Doctrine Under PressureIIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law201348
54Is competition always good?Journal of Antitrust Enforcement201348
55Recent Studies on Common Ownership, Firm Behavior, and Market OutcomesAntitrust Bulletin202148
56Multimarket Interdependence and Performance in Banking: Two TestsAntitrust Bulletin198548
57Is Criminalization of EU Competition Law the Answer?World Competition200548
58The Effects of Antitrust and Intellectual Property Law on Compatibility and InnovationAntitrust Bulletin199847
59Michelin II: A Per Se Rule Against Rebates by Dominant Companies?Journal of Competition Law and Economics200547
60SHOULD "PRICE SQUEEZE" BE A RECOGNIZED FORM OF ANTICOMPETITIVE CONDUCT?Journal of Competition Law and Economics200747
61THE USE AND THREAT OF INJUNCTIONS IN THE RAND CONTEXTJournal of Competition Law and Economics201347
62Copyright Law on Blockchains: Between New Forms of Rights Administration and Digital Rights Management 2.0IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law201947
63The Competitive Effects of the GDPRJournal of Competition Law and Economics202047
64ALLIANCES, CODESHARING, ANTITRUST IMMUNITY, AND INTERNATIONAL AIRFARES: DO PREVIOUS PATTERNS PERSIST?Journal of Competition Law and Economics201146
65WHO COOPERATES IN STANDARDS CONSORTIA--RIVALS OR COMPLEMENTORS?Journal of Competition Law and Economics201345
66The Size of Cartel Overcharges: Implications for U.S. and EU Fining PoliciesAntitrust Bulletin200645
67Setting Technical Compatibility Standards: An Economic AnalysisAntitrust Bulletin198545
68The Problem of Geographic Market Delineation Revisited: The Case of CoalAntitrust Bulletin197844
69The Relationship between Entry into Banking Markets and Changes in Legal Restrictions on EntryAntitrust Bulletin199242
70The Meaning of Monopoly: Antitrust Analysis in High-Technology IndustriesAntitrust Bulletin199842
71AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE EUROPEAN LENIENCY NOTICEJournal of Competition Law and Economics200942
72THE MEANING OF FRAND, PART I: ROYALTIESJournal of Competition Law and Economics201342
73Anatomy of the Rise and Fall of a Price-Fixing Conspiracy: Auctions at Sotheby's and Christie'sJournal of Competition Law and Economics200541
74SCREENING FOR BID RIGGING—DOES IT WORK?Journal of Competition Law and Economics201841
75QUANTIFICATION OF HARM IN DAMAGES ACTIONS FOR ANTITRUST INFRINGEMENTS: INSIGHTS FROM GERMAN CARTEL CASESJournal of Competition Law and Economics201039
76THE FALLACIES OF PATENT-HOLDUP THEORYJournal of Competition Law and Economics201739
77Climate change, sustainability, and competition lawJournal of Antitrust Enforcement202039
78Harnessing Platform Envelopment in the Digital WorldJournal of Competition Law and Economics202039
79FAIR, REASONABLE AND NON-DISCRIMINATORY (FRAND) TERMS: A CHALLENGE FOR COMPETITION AUTHORITIESJournal of Competition Law and Economics201138
80Deterrence and Detection of Cartels: Using all the Tools and SanctionsAntitrust Bulletin201138
81Ten Years of Regulation 1/2003-A RetrospectiveJournal of European Competition Law and Practice201338
82(null)World Competition200238
83The Relationship between Public Antitrust Enforcement and Private Actions for DamagesWorld Competition200938
84Economic Theories of Bundling and Their Policy Implications in Abuse Cases: An Assessment in Light of the Microsoft CaseEuropean Competition Journal200537
85REVISING THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINESJournal of Competition Law and Economics201037
86THE FTC, IP, AND SSOS: GOVERNMENT HOLD-UP REPLACING PRIVATE COORDINATIONJournal of Competition Law and Economics201237
87Michael Porter on CompetitionAntitrust Bulletin199937
88FORENSIC ECONOMICS: AN INTRODUCTION WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON PRICE FIXINGJournal of Competition Law and Economics200736
89Indirect Information Exchange: The Constituent Elements of Hub and Spoke CollusionEuropean Competition Journal201136
90MEASURING THE DETERRENCE PROPERTIES OF COMPETITION POLICY: THE COMPETITION POLICY INDEXESJournal of Competition Law and Economics201136
91IS THE GOOGLE PLATFORM A TWO-SIDED MARKET?Journal of Competition Law and Economics201436
92International Antitrust: Against Minimum Rules; for Cosmopolitan PrinciplesAntitrust Bulletin199835
93Antitrust Policy and Hospital Mergers: Recommendations for a New ApproachAntitrust Bulletin200235
94The Impact of the New Substantive Test in European Merger ControlEuropean Competition Journal200635
95WHAT DOES THE CHICAGO SCHOOL TEACH ABOUT INTERNET SEARCH AND THE ANTITRUST TREATMENT OF GOOGLE?Journal of Competition Law and Economics201235
96CARTEL OVERCHARGES AND THE DETERRENT EFFECT OF EU COMPETITION LAWJournal of Competition Law and Economics201435
97HOW PATENTS PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION OF THE MARKET FOR INVENTIONSJournal of Competition Law and Economics201535
98Merger Activity and Merger Theories: An Empirical InvestigationAntitrust Bulletin197935
99COMPETITION VERSUS PROPERTY RIGHTS: AMERICAN ANTITRUST LAW, THE FREIBURG SCHOOL, AND THE EARLY YEARS OF EUROPEAN COMPETITION POLICYJournal of Competition Law and Economics200934
100THE GOOGLE BOOK SEARCH SETTLEMENT: A NEW ORPHAN-WORKS MONOPOLY?Journal of Competition Law and Economics200934