Abstract
Collaborative writing using a wiki (an online platform) is useful for learning to write in another language because it enables a group of learners to write together, discuss their writing process and product and exchange personalised participatory peer-feedback. In other words, collaborative writers can individually generate and consume feedback on language, content, contribution and participation, mediated through the group’s collaborative products, namely, their written text and their written, spoken or signed discussions about the text. Collaborative wiki writing is also useful because it can develop learners’ skills in (1) idea creation, (2) writing in the target language, and (3) information literacy, as well as (4) social and interpersonal skills, (5) personal skills, (6) cognitive or academic skills and (7) metacognitive skills. Depending on the writing activity/task design and how learners tackle it, the process of collaborative writing in the target language may integrate the use of these different skills and bring collaborative writers a sense of achievement, positive attitudes, and confidence in writing. Collaborative wiki writing has advantages for both learners and teachers. The process meets language learners’ needs for an audience, sharing ideas, language input, language output, experience in solving language problems, taking on different social roles, giving feedback (with the possibility of the protégé effect) and observing language feedback and negotiation in other group members. The process meets language teachers’ needs for developing their learners’ communication skills and, using Kumaravadivelu’s terms (Beyond methods: macrostrategies for language teaching. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 2003), particularity (teaching responsively to their own learners in context), practicality (reflexivity in turning practice to theory and theory to practice), and possibility (potential for developing social identity and for transforming social inequalities). Collaborative wiki writing in a target language, such as English, is useful for developing language proficiency through interaction at the same time as a range of cognitive, affective and social skills.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). Pearson Education: Harlow.
Colomb, G., & Simutis, J. A. (1996). Visible conversation and academic inquiry: CMC in a culturally diverse classroom. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 203–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58.
Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 81–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Haughton Mifflin Harcourt.
Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jahin, J. H. (2012). The effect of peer reviewing on writing apprehension and essay writing ability of prospective EFL teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(11), 60–84.
Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & danah boyd (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. Cambridge: Polity.
Jiao, Y., & Yuan, J. (2008). Research on the collective knowledge sharing and innovation service based on wiki. Information Science, 26(5), 652–656.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Lee, I. (2011). Working smarter, not working harder: Revisiting teacher feedback in the L2 writing classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 67(3), 377–399.
Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2010). The significance of educational dialogues between primary school children. In C. Howe & K. Littleton (Eds.), Educational dialogues. London: Routledge.
Luckin, R., Baines, E., Cukurova, M., & Holmes, W. with Mann, M. (2017). Solved! Making the case for collaborative problem-solving. Nesta. Accessed March 6, 2018. https://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/solved-making-case-collaborative-problem-solving.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
Myers, G. (2010). The discourse of blogs and wikis. London: Continuum.
Okita, S. Y., & Schwartz, D. L. (2013). Learning by teaching human pupils and teachable agents: The importance of recursive feedback. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 375–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.807263.
OECD (2017). PISA 2015 results (Volume V): Collaborative problem solving. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264285521-en.
Page, R. (2018). Narratives online: Shared stories and social media controversies. Cambridge: CUP.
Spilioti, T. (2018). The language of social media. In P. Seargeant, A. Hewings, & S. Pihlaja (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language studies (pp. 310–323).
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Michigan: MIT Press.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153–173.
Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275–288.
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Su, F., & Beaumont, C. (2010). Evaluating the use of a wiki for collaborative learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(4), 417–431.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Lier, L. (2004). The semiotics and ecology of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Vorobel, D., & Kim, D. (2017). Adolescent ELLs’ collaborative writing practices in face-to-face and online contexts: From perceptions to action. System, 65, 78–89.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2006). Electronic feedback and second language writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 105–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weissberg, R. (2006). Connecting speaking and writing in second language instruction. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 364–374.
Wikipedia. (2017). Wiki. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki. Accessed June 10, 2017.
Yong, M. F. (2006). The nature and dynamics of collaborative writing in a Malaysian tertiary ESL setting. Unpublished Ph.D.: Massey University, New Zealand.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kemp, C. et al. (2019). Collaborative Wiki Writing Gives Language Learners Opportunities for Personalised Participatory Peer-Feedback. In: Yu, S., Niemi, H., Mason, J. (eds) Shaping Future Schools with Digital Technology. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9439-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9439-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9438-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9439-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)