Skip to main content

Collaborative Wiki Writing Gives Language Learners Opportunities for Personalised Participatory Peer-Feedback

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shaping Future Schools with Digital Technology

Abstract

Collaborative writing using a wiki (an online platform) is useful for learning to write in another language because it enables a group of learners to write together, discuss their writing process and product and exchange personalised participatory peer-feedback. In other words, collaborative writers can individually generate and consume feedback on language, content, contribution and participation, mediated through the group’s collaborative products, namely, their written text and their written, spoken or signed discussions about the text. Collaborative wiki writing is also useful because it can develop learners’ skills in (1) idea creation, (2) writing in the target language, and (3) information literacy, as well as (4) social and interpersonal skills, (5) personal skills, (6) cognitive or academic skills and (7) metacognitive skills. Depending on the writing activity/task design and how learners tackle it, the process of collaborative writing in the target language may integrate the use of these different skills and bring collaborative writers a sense of achievement, positive attitudes, and confidence in writing. Collaborative wiki writing has advantages for both learners and teachers. The process meets language learners’ needs for an audience, sharing ideas, language input, language output, experience in solving language problems, taking on different social roles, giving feedback (with the possibility of the protégé effect) and observing language feedback and negotiation in other group members. The process meets language teachers’ needs for developing their learners’ communication skills and, using Kumaravadivelu’s terms (Beyond methods: macrostrategies for language teaching. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 2003), particularity (teaching responsively to their own learners in context), practicality (reflexivity in turning practice to theory and theory to practice), and possibility (potential for developing social identity and for transforming social inequalities). Collaborative wiki writing in a target language, such as English, is useful for developing language proficiency through interaction at the same time as a range of cognitive, affective and social skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). Pearson Education: Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomb, G., & Simutis, J. A. (1996). Visible conversation and academic inquiry: CMC in a culturally diverse classroom. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 203–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 81–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Haughton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jahin, J. H. (2012). The effect of peer reviewing on writing apprehension and essay writing ability of prospective EFL teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(11), 60–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & danah boyd (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, Y., & Yuan, J. (2008). Research on the collective knowledge sharing and innovation service based on wiki. Information Science, 26(5), 652–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I. (2011). Working smarter, not working harder: Revisiting teacher feedback in the L2 writing classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 67(3), 377–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2010). The significance of educational dialogues between primary school children. In C. Howe & K. Littleton (Eds.), Educational dialogues. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckin, R., Baines, E., Cukurova, M., & Holmes, W. with Mann, M. (2017). Solved! Making the case for collaborative problem-solving. Nesta. Accessed March 6, 2018. https://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/solved-making-case-collaborative-problem-solving.

  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G. (2010). The discourse of blogs and wikis. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okita, S. Y., & Schwartz, D. L. (2013). Learning by teaching human pupils and teachable agents: The importance of recursive feedback. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 375–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.807263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2017). PISA 2015 results (Volume V): Collaborative problem solving. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264285521-en.

  • Page, R. (2018). Narratives online: Shared stories and social media controversies. Cambridge: CUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spilioti, T. (2018). The language of social media. In P. Seargeant, A. Hewings, & S. Pihlaja (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language studies (pp. 310–323).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Michigan: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Su, F., & Beaumont, C. (2010). Evaluating the use of a wiki for collaborative learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(4), 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (2004). The semiotics and ecology of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vorobel, D., & Kim, D. (2017). Adolescent ELLs’ collaborative writing practices in face-to-face and online contexts: From perceptions to action. System, 65, 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2006). Electronic feedback and second language writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 105–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, R. (2006). Connecting speaking and writing in second language instruction. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. (2017). Wiki. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki. Accessed June 10, 2017.

  • Yong, M. F. (2006). The nature and dynamics of collaborative writing in a Malaysian tertiary ESL setting. Unpublished Ph.D.: Massey University, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte Kemp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kemp, C. et al. (2019). Collaborative Wiki Writing Gives Language Learners Opportunities for Personalised Participatory Peer-Feedback. In: Yu, S., Niemi, H., Mason, J. (eds) Shaping Future Schools with Digital Technology. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9439-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9439-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9438-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9439-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics