Skip to main content

International, National and Classroom Assessment: Potent Factors in Shaping What Counts in School Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine the potential influences of international, national and classroom assessment programmes on what counts in school science. To do this, we develop a multilayered framework that considers the interactions between levels of assessment (international, national and classroom) and how science is articulated at the national, school and classroom levels. International and national science assessments as well as broader assessment policies are considered in relation to their potential influences on school science. Drawing on the New Zealand context, we illustrate how assessment policies and procedures act to both broaden, but more often constrain, what counts in school science. The international and New Zealand picture is complex, but emerging evidence suggests that multilayered assessment initiatives have significant impact on the way in which science education is operationalised at the national, school and classroom level, including the nature of the curriculum, classroom approaches and the time spent on science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Absolum, M., Flockton, L., Hattie, J., Hipkins, R., & Reid, I. (2009). Directions for assessment in New Zealand: Developing students’ assessment capabilities. Wellington: Ministry of Education. http://www.tki.org.nz/r/assessment/research/mainpage/directions/. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J. (2009). Cross-national response styles in international educational assessments: Evidence from PISA 2006. https://edsurveys.rti.org/PISA/documents/Buckley_PISAresponsestyle.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Bull, A., Gilbert, J., Barwick, H., Hipkins, R., & Baker, R. (2010). Inspired by science. A paper commissioned by the Royal Society of New Zealand and the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor. www.nzcer.org.nz/pdfs/inspired-by-science.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, B., Jones, A., & Harlow, A. (2004). Primary and secondary teachers experiences of science in the New Zealand Curriculum. NZ Science Teacher, 104, 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, B., Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2008). The classroom InSiTE project: Understanding classroom interaction to enhance teaching and learning in science and technology in Years 1–8. Wellington: Teaching and Learning Research Initiative. http://www.tlri.org.nz/assets/A_Project-PDFs/9215-Cowie/9215_finalreport.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Cowie, B., Hipkins, R., Boyd, S., Bull, A., Keown, P., McGee, C., et al. (2009). Curriculum implementation exploratory studies. Report to the Ministry of Education. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research and Wilf Malcolm Institute of Educational Research, University of Waikato.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, T., & Flockton, L. (2004). National Education Monitoring Project. Science assessment results 2003. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, T., Darr, C., Gilmore, A., Hall, C., Hattie, J., Smith, J., & Smith, L. (2009). Towards defining, assessing and reporting against national standards for literacy and numeracy in New Zealand. http://www.eshd.canterbury.ac.nz/Documents/Towards%20defining,%20assessing%20and%20reporting%20against%20national%20standards%20for%20literacy%20and%20numeracy%20in%20nz.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Dingle, R., & Joyce, C. (2011). ARB survey. http://arb.nzcer.org.nz/pdf/ARBsurvey.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Engler, R. (2010). Are particular school subjects associated with better performance at university? Wellington: Ministry of Education. http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/79342/School-subjects-tertiary-performance-28072010.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Fensham, P. (2007). Values in the measurement of students’ science achievement in TIMSS and PISA. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 215–229). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, A. (2001). National Education Monitoring Project: Assessment resources for teachers. Report to the Ministry of Education. Christchurch: University of Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, P. (2011). Looking ahead: Science education for the twenty-first century. A report from the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor. Auckland: Office of the Prime Minister’s Science Advisory Committee. http://www.pmcsa.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Looking-ahead-Science-education-for-the-twenty-first-century.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Harlen, W. (2001). Scientific literacy in the OECD/PISA project. Studies in Science Education, 36, 79–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipkins, R. (2007). Assessing key competencies: Why would we? How could we? Wellington: Ministry of Education. http://www.nzcer.org.nz/research/publications/assessing-key-competencies-why-would-we-how-could-we. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Hipkins, R., & Kenneally, N. (2003). Using NEMP to inform the teaching of science skills. A report to the NEMP board. Wellington: NZCER/NEMP/Ministry of Education. http://www.nzcer.org.nz/pdfs/12736.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • Hume, A., & Coll, R. (2010). Authentic student inquiry: The mismatch between the intended curriculum and the student-experienced curriculum. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(1), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2012). Technology in science education: Context, contestation, and connection. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 811–821). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2005). The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in assessment for learning practices: A case study of a whole school approach. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, C., & Darr, C. (2008). The role of an online repository of assessment tasks and resources: The place of the Assessment Resource Banks. Paper presented at the 6th conference of the International test Commission: The impact of testing on people and society: Enhancing the value of test use, Liverpool. http://www.nzcer.org.nz/pdfs/16705.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2011.

  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonazalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international science report. Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Centre, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international science report. Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Centre, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L., McLure, J., Walkey, F., McKenzie, L., & Weir, K. (2006). The impact of NCEA on student motivation. Final report to the Ministry of Education. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington. http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/29356/student-motivation-report-june-2006.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2011.

  • Ministerial Working Party on Assessment for Better Learning. (1990). Tomorrow’s standards. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (1993). The New Zealand curriculum framework. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007a). Statement of intent 2007–2012. Wellington: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2007b). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2010). Ministry of Education position paper: Assessment. Wellington: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeed, A. (2010). Science investigation in New Zealand secondary schools: Exploring the links between learning, motivation and internal assessment in Year 11. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, J., & Cowie, J. (2008). Supporting teachers to develop their pedagogical content knowledge in service of assessment for learning. Paper presented at the British Education Research Association Conference, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nentwig, P., Roennebeck, S., Schoeps, K., Rumann, S., & Carstensen, C. (2009). Performance and levels of contextualisation in a selection of OECD countries in PISA 2006. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 897–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. Paris: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive summary. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2011.

  • OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. I). Paris: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poskitt, J., & Taylor, K. (2008). National Education Findings of Assess to Learn (AtoL) Report. http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/schooling/27968/5. Accessed 1 June 2011.

  • Robitaille, D. F., & Garden, R. A. (Eds.). (1996). Research questions and study design (TIMSS monograph, Vol. 2). Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satherley, P. (2006). Student outcome overview 2001–2005. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alister Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, A., Buntting, C. (2013). International, National and Classroom Assessment: Potent Factors in Shaping What Counts in School Science. In: Corrigan, D., Gunstone, R., Jones, A. (eds) Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6668-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics