Skip to main content

URB@Exp: Urban Labs as a New Form of Participation and Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Renewal, Community and Participation

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

Cities are facing economic, social and environmental challenges of growing complexity. Solutions will only be possible by value-based, integrative and inclusive concepts, approaches and processes. Therefore, transdisciplinarity and new governance methods, such as Urban Labs, are needed to meet today’s ‘Grand Challenges’. The transdisciplinary approach of this chapter is based on city-specific societal challenges, which are supplemented by specific scientific challenges leading to science–society interactions and knowledge exchange using participatory experimental platforms, like Living Labs and City Labs. Real-life experiments in these Urban Labs support networking, social and reflexive learning for joint visions, capacity building and co-designing beyond hierarchies, unequal power relations and the dominance of economic interests. Consequently, these novel forms of governance lead to new coalitions and networks, technical and social innovations that foster the capacity of urban actors to cope with complex change dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bergvall-Kåreborn B, Howcroft D, Ståhlbröst A, Wikman AM (2010) Participation in living lab: designing systems with users. In: Pries-Heje J, Venable J, Bunker D, Russo NL, DeGross JI (eds) Human benefit through the diffusion of information systems design science research. TDIT (2010) IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 318. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bevir M (2012) Governance: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Björgvinsson E, Ehn P, Hilgren PA (2012) Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalized social movements. CoDesign 8(2):127–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bødker S, Ehn P, Sjögren D, Sundblad Y (2000) Co-operative design—perspectives on 20 years with the Scandinavian IT design model. In Proceedings of the first Nordic conference on human-computer interaction, Association for Computing Machinery, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Budweg S, Kristensen K (2009) Co-creation in distributed ICT living labs: a reflection on communicative practices. In Proceedings of the INTERACT 2009 workshop, Report A12349, SINTEF, Oslo, pp 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullinger HJ, Röthlein B (2012) Morgenstadt. Wie wir morgen leben: Lösungen für das urbane Leben der Zukunft. Carl Hanser, München

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall A (2004) New democratic spaces? The politics and dynamics of institutionalised participation, IDS Bulletin 35(2):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutard O, Finnveden G, Kabisch S, Kitchin R, Matos R, Nijkamp P, Pronello C, Robinson D (2014) Urban megatrends: towards a European research agenda. http://jpi-urbaneurope.eu/activities/sria-agenda/. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  • Dutilleul B, Birrer FAJ, Mensink W (2010) Unpacking European living labs: analysing innovation’s social dimensions. Cent Eur J Publ Policy 4(1):60–85

    Google Scholar 

  • ENOLL (2017): European Network of Living Labs. http://www.openlivinglabs.eu. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  • European Commission (2001). European Governance—A white paper. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52001DC0428&rid=2. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  • European Commission (2009). Living Labs for user-driven open innovation: an overview of the Living Labs methodology, activities and achievements. http://www.eurosportello.eu/sites/default/files/Living%20Lab%20brochure_jan09_en_0.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  • European Commission (2010). Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  • European Commission (2011). A resource-efficient Europe—Flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 Strategy. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0021:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  • European Commission (2014). A comprehensive EU response to the financial crisis: substantial progress towards a strong financial framework for Europe and a banking union for the eurozone. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-244_en.htm. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  • European Commission (2015). Sustainable development in the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/6975281/KS-GT-15-001-EN-N.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  • European Council (2006). Current sustainable development strategy. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2010917%202006%20INIT. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  • European Union (2011). Cities of tomorrow. Challenges, visions, ways forward. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/citiesoftomorrow/citiesoftomorrow_final.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  • Farazmand A (2004) Sound governance. policy and administrative innovations. Praeger Publishers, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Følstad A, Brandtzæg PB, Gulliksen J, Börjeson M, Näkki P (2009) Towards a manifesto of living lab co-creation. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5727:979–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia M (2006) Citizenship practices and urban governance in European cities. Urban Studies 43:745–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerometta J, Haussermann H, Longo G (2005) Social innovation and civil society in urban governance: strategies for an inclusive city. Urban Studies 42:2007–2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilardi F, Radaelli CM (2012) Governance and learning. In: Levi-Faur D (ed) The oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 155–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A, Kopfmüller J (2012) Nachhaltigkeit. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillgren PA, Seravalli A, Emilson A (2011) Prototyping and infrastructuring in design for social innovation. CoDesign 7(3–4):169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogma R, Kemp R, Schot J, Truffer B (2002) Experimenting for sustainable transport: the approach of strategic niche management. EF&N Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman C (2014) Displacement through participation. Tijdschrift voor Econoische en Soziale Geografie 105:164–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ 79:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janschitz S, Zimmermann F (2010) Regional modeling and the logics of sustainability—a social theory approach for regional development and change. Environ Econ 1(1):134–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen A, van Heur B (2014) Urban laboratories: experiments in reworking cities. Int J Urban Reg Res 38(2):379–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Loorbach D (2006) Transition management: a reflexive governance approach. In: Voss JP, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (eds) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 103–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell W (2000) E-topia: urban life, jim-but not as we know it. Massachusetts: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes RAW (1996) Understanding governance: policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J, Kemp R, Van Asselt M (2001) More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight 3(1):15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer B (2003) Die Internationalisierung von Staatlichkeit. Geschlechterpolitische Perspektiven. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 51(4):621–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl C, Kemp R (2016) City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes. Urban Planning 1(4):89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl C, Agger Eriksen M, Baerten N, Clark E, Drage T, Essebo M, Hilgren PA, Hoeflehner T, de Kraker J, Rjkens-Klomp N, Seravali A, Wachtmeister A, Wlasak P (eds) (2017) Guidelines for urban labs. URB@Exp project 2014–2017. JPI Urban Europe

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen E (2012) Governance and innovation in the public sector. In: Levi-Faur D (ed) The oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 215–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotarauta M, Srinivas S (2006) Co-evolutionary policy processes: understanding innovative economies and future resilience. Futures 38(4):312–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw E (2005) Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies 42:1991–2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M (2007) Community participation in the real world: opportunities and pitfalls in new governance spaces. Urban Studies 44(2):297–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2014) Governance for sustainable development. Integrating governance in the post-2015 development framework (United Nations Discussion Paper, New York, 2014) at http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Democratic%20Governance/Discussion-Paper–Governance-for-Sustainable-Development.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2017

  • Van den Bosch S (2010) Transition experiments. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Exploring Societal Change towards Sustainability

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, S. (2010). The co-evolvement in local development—from the triple to the quadruple helix model. In Conference paper at triple helix VIII, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann FM (2016) Nachhaltigkeit wofür? Von Chancen und Herausforderungen für eine nachhaltige Zukunft. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48191-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich M. Zimmermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Höflehner, T., Zimmermann, F.M. (2018). URB@Exp: Urban Labs as a New Form of Participation and Governance. In: Clark, J., Wise, N. (eds) Urban Renewal, Community and Participation. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72311-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics