Abstract
In this chapter I aim to discuss specific ways in which the theoretical and methodological approach of discursive psychology could contribute to systemic family therapy research. Despite its resonance with systemic family therapy, up-to-date systemic family therapy research has minimally explored its methodological potential for the study of therapeutic dialogue. In this chapter, following a brief overview of discursive psychology, I will discuss three specific theoretical and methodological proposals which indicate its potential, due to their affinity with systemic, family therapy tenets. These include a rhetorical, argumentative perspective to the study of therapeutic conversations; an intersubjective, “systemic” perspective to psychological phenomena like identity; and a historically and politically informed perspective to the study of therapeutic discourse, as depicted in the notion of ideological dilemmas. While providing examples from family therapy studies, I will conclude with a critical appraisal of the methodological potential of discursive psychology for systemic family therapy research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antaki, C. (2014). Conversation analysis and the discursive turn in social psychology. In N. Bozatzis & Th. Dragonas (Eds.), The discursive turn in social psychology (pp. 74–86). Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Worldshare Books.
Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identities in talk. London, UK: Sage.
Augoustinos, M., & Tileagă, C. (2012). Twenty five years of discursive psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02096.x
Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Glascow, Scotland: Fontana/Collins.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London, UK: Sage.
Billig, M. (2012). Undisciplined beginnings, academic success, and discursive psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02086.x
Billig, M. (2014). Towards a psychoanalytic discursive psychology: Moving from consciousness to unconsciousness. In N. Bozatzis & T. Dragonas (Eds.), The discursive turn in social psychology (pp. 159–170). Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Worldshare Books.
Borcsa, M., & Rober, P. (2016). Research perspectives in couple therapy: Discursive qualitative methods. Switzerland: Springer.
Bozatzis, N. (2009). Occidentalism and accountability: Constructing culture and cultural difference in majority Greek talk about the minority in Western Thrace. Discourse & Society, 20(4), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509104022
Bozatzis, N. (2014). The discursive turn in social psychology: Four nodal debates. In N. Bozatzis & T. Dragonas (Eds.), The discursive turn in social psychology (pp. 25–50). Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Worldshare Books.
Bozatzis, N. (2016). Cultural othering, banal occidentalism and the discursive construction of the ‘Greek crisis’ in global media: A case study. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society, 41(2), 47–71. Retrieved from https://journal.fi/suomenantropologi/article/view/59642
Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
Diorinou, M., & Tseliou, E. (2014). Studying circular questioning ‘in situ’: Discourse analysis of a first systemic family therapy session. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 40(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12005
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London, UK: Sage.
Edwards, D. (2012). Discursive and scientific psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02103.x
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London, UK: Sage.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.1.23
Flaskas, C., & Pocock, D. (2009). Systems and psychoanalysis: Contemporary integrations in family therapy. London, UK: Karnac.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Tavistock. (Original work published 1969).
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice Hall.
Guilfoyle, M. (2018). Constructing unfinalizability: A subject positioning analysis of a couple’s therapy session hosted by Tom Andersen. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44, 426. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12305
Hare-Mustin, R. T. (1994). Discourses in the mirrored room: A postmodern analysis of therapy. Family Process, 33(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15455300.1994.00019.x
Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Threats: Power, family mealtimes, and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X500791
Hepburn, A., & Wiggins, S. (Eds.). (2005). Developments in discursive psychology. Discourse & Society, 16(5), 595–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505054937
Kogan, S. (1998). The politics of making meaning: Discourse analysis of a ‘postmodern’ interview. Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00085
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London, UK: Verso.
Lester, J. N. (2014). Discursive psychology: Methodology and applications. Qualitative Psychology, 1(2), 141–143. https://doi.org/10.1037//qup0000015
O’Reilly, M. (2007). Who’s a naughty boy then? Accountability, family therapy, and the “naughty” child. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 15(3), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480707301316
O’Reilly, M., Lester, M., & Kiyimba, N. (2018). Discursive psychology as a method of analysis for the study of couple and family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44, 409. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12288
Parker, I. (2012). Discursive social psychology now. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02046.x
Patrika, P., & Tseliou, E. (2016a). Blame, responsibility and systemic neutrality: A discourse analysis methodology to the study of family therapy problem talk. Journal of Family Therapy, 38(4), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12076
Patrika, P., & Tseliou, E. (2016b). The ‘blame game’: Discourse analysis of family members and therapist negotiation of problem definition in systemic family therapy. European Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejcop.v4i1.80. Retrieved from: http://ejcop.psychopen.eu/article/view/80
Penn, P. (1982). Circular questioning. Family Process, 21(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1982.00267.x
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London, UK: Sage.
Potter, J. (2011). Discursive psychology and discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 104–119). London, UK: Routledge.
Potter, J. (2012a). Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological) (Vol. 2, pp. 119–138). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Potter, J. (2012b). Re-reading discourse and social psychology: Transforming social psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02085.x
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Discursive psychology as a qualitative approach for analysing interaction in medical settings. Medical Education, 39, 338–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02099.x
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London, UK: Sage.
Sacks, H. (1989). Lecture six. The M.I.R. membership categorization device. Human Studies, 22, 271–281. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
Sametband, I., & Strong, T. (2018). Immigrant family members negotiating preferred cultural identities in family therapy conversations: A discursive analysis. Journal of Family Therapy, 40(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.1216
Sapountzis, A., & Vikka, K. (2015). Psychologization in talk and the perpetuation of racism in the context of the Greek school. Social Psychology of Education, 18(2), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9258-6
Stancombe, J., & White, S. (2005). Cause and responsibility: Towards an interactional understanding of blaming and ‘neutrality’ in family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 330–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2005.00326.x
Tileagă, C., & Stokoe, E. (2016). Contemporary discursive psychology. In C. Tileagă & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues. London, UK: Routledge.
Tomm, K. (1985). Circular interviewing: A multifaceted clinical tool. In D. Campbell & R. Draper (Eds.), Applications of systemic family therapy (pp. 33–45). New York, NY: Grune and Stratton.
Tseliou, E. (2013). A critical methodological review of discourse and conversation analysis studies of family therapy. Family Process, 52(4), 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12043
Tseliou, E. (2015). Discourse analysis and educational research: Challenge and promise. In T. Dragonas, K. Gergen, S. McNamee, & E. Tseliou (Eds.), Education as social construction: Contributions in theory, research and practice (pp. 263–282). Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Worldshare Books Publications. http://www.taosinstitute.net/education-as-social-construction
Tseliou, E. (2017). Conversation and discourse analysis for couple and family therapy. In J. Lebow, A. Champers, & D. C. Breunlin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of couple and family therapy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_941-1
Tseliou, E. (2018). Conversation analysis, discourse analysis and psychotherapy research: Overview and methodological potential. In O. Smoliak & T. Strong (Eds.), Therapy as discourse: Practice and research (pp. 163–186). London, UK: Palgrave.
Tseliou, E., & Borcsa, M. (2018). Discursive methodologies for couple and family therapy research: Editorial to special section. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(3), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12308
Tseliou, E., Smoliak, O., LaMarre, A., & Quinn-Nilas, C. (2019). Discursive psychology as applied science. In K. O’Doherty & D. Hodgetts (Eds.), The Sage handbook of applied social psychology (pp. 400–419). London, UK: Sage.
Ugazio, V., Fellin, L., Pennacchio, R., Negri, A., & Colciago, F. (2012). Is systemic thinking really extraneous to common sense? Journal of Family Therapy, 34, 513–1791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2011.00538.x
Watzlawick, P., Beavin-Bavelas, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. New York, NY: Norton.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003005
Wetherell, M. (2007). A step too far: Discursive psychology, linguistic ethnography and questions of identity. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 11(5), 661–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00345.x
Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (2014). A discursive psychological framework for analyzing men and masculinities. Psychology of Men and Masculinities, 15(4), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037148
White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York, NY: Norton.
Wiggins, S. (2017). Discursive psychology: Theory, method and applications. London, UK: Sage.
Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). Berkshire, UK: McGraw Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tseliou, E. (2020). Discourse Analysis and Systemic Family Therapy Research: The Methodological Contribution of Discursive Psychology. In: Ochs, M., Borcsa, M., Schweitzer, J. (eds) Systemic Research in Individual, Couple, and Family Therapy and Counseling. European Family Therapy Association Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36560-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36560-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36559-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36560-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)