Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Tumor Size on the Outcomes of Patients with Resectable Distal Pancreatic Cancer: Lessons Learned from a Series of 158 Radical Resections

  • Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Neoadjuvant therapy is used for borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with high risk of incomplete resection and early recurrence. Because distal PDAC is rare, the optimal criteria for neoadjuvant therapy specific for distal PDAC remain unclear. We hypothesized large distal PDAC would recur earlier than small distal PDAC.

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for failure of upfront resection for resectable distal PDAC.

Methods

The study cohort comprised 158 patients with resectable distal PDAC who underwent radical resection. The long-term outcomes were recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and post-recurrence survival (PRS).

Results

R0 resection was achieved in 92% of patients, and median DSS for the entire cohort was 31 months. Among 103 patients who developed recurrence, 32 (31%) developed recurrence within 6 months. The median PRS and DSS for those with early recurrence was 6 and 10 months, respectively, compared with 11 and 30 months, respectively, for those with late recurrence (= 0.017 and < 0.001, respectively). Patients with tumors > 4 cm had higher rates of R1 resection (16%) and concomitant resection of another organ (19%) than those with smaller tumors (4% and 2%, = 0.009 and < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, tumor > 4 cm remained a significant predictor of early recurrence (< 0.001, hazard ratio [HR] 6.51), shorter RFS (= 0.018, HR 1.71), and shorter DSS (= 0.002, HR 2.07).

Conclusion

Tumor size > 4 cm is a reliable predictor of early recurrence after resection of distal PDAC, and neoadjuvant therapy may help select patients who can benefit from radical resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lau MK, Davila JA, Shaib YH. Incidence and survival of pancreatic head and body and tail cancers: a population-based study in the United States. Pancreas. 2010;39(4):458–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Isaji S, Mizuno S, Windsor JA, et al. International consensus on definition and criteria of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 2017. Pancreatology. 2018;18(1):2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz MH, Pisters PW, Evans DB, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: the importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(5):833–46 (discussion 846–838).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN guidelines version 1.2019, Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. 2018. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/pancreatic.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2019.

  5. Takeda Y, Saiura A, Takahashi Y, et al. Asymptomatic pancreatic cancer: does incidental detection impact long-term outcomes? J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(8):1287–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Watanabe G, Ito H, Sato T, et al. Left kidney mobilization technique during radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS). Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2019;404(2):247–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 8th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017.

  8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brennan MF, Moccia RD, Klimstra D. Management of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 1996;223(5):506–11 (discussion 511–502).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Christein JD, Kendrick ML, Iqbal CW, Nagorney DM, Farnell MB. Distal pancreatectomy for resectable adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(7):922–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K, et al. Distal pancreatectomy—does it have a role for pancreatic body and tail cancer. Hepato-gastroenterology. 1998;45(21):827–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shoup M, Conlon KC, Klimstra D, Brennan MF. Is extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas justified? J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(8):946–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sperti C, Pasquali C, Pedrazzoli S. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(3):255–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fabre JM, Houry S, Manderscheid JC, Huguier M, Baumel H. Surgery for left-sided pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 1996;83(8):1065–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujita T, Nakagohri T, Gotohda N, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic factors and significance of lymph node status in invasive ductal carcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas. Pancreas. 2010;39(1):e48-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F, Hawkins WG, Linehan DC, Strasberg SM. Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(1):46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Paye F, Micelli Lupinacci R, Bachellier P, Boher JM, Delpero JR. Distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic carcinoma in the era of multimodal treatment. Br J Surg. 2015;102(3):229–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shin SH, Kim SC, Song KB, et al. Appraisal of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: a large volume cohort study of 152 consecutive patients. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9):e0163266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto J, Saiura A, Koga R, et al. Improved survival of left-sided pancreas cancer after surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40(6):530–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou Y, Shi B, Wu L, Si X. A systematic review of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(1):10–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chun YS. Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(1):46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Park HJ, You DD, Choi DW, Heo JS, Choi SH. Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. World J Surg. 2014;38(1):186–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song KB, Kwon J, Kim YW, et al. Prognostic value of adjacent organ resection in patients with left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019;26(6):227–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sharma G, Whang EE, Ruan DT, Ito H. Efficacy of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a decision analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(Suppl 3):S1229-1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Büschenfelde C, Friess H, Kleeff J. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7(4):e1000267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Janssen QP, Buettner S, Suker M, et al. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(8):782–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lof S, Korrel M, van Hilst J, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic body or tail on surgical and oncological outcome: a propensity-score matched multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(6):1986–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nelson DW, Chang SC, Grunkemeier G, et al. Resectable distal pancreas cancer: time to reconsider the role of upfront surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(13):4012–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Groot VP, Gemenetzis G, Blair AB, et al. Defining and predicting early recurrence in 957 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2019;269(6):1154–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferrone CR, Marchegiani G, Hong TS, et al. Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):12–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wagner M, Antunes C, Pietrasz D, et al. CT evaluation after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(7):3104–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Miyasaka Y, Ohtsuka T, Kimura R, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer potentially improves survival and facilitates surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(5):1528–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Arvold ND, Niemierko A, Mamon HJ, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Hong TS. Pancreatic cancer tumor size on CT scan versus pathologic specimen: implications for radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(5):1383–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Marchegiani G, Andrianello S, Malleo G, et al. Does size matter in pancreatic cancer? reappraisal of tumour dimension as a predictor of outcome beyond the TNM. Ann Surg. 2017;266(1):142–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kelly Zammit, BVSc, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiromichi Ito MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Genki Watanabe, Yuta Ushida, Atsushi Oba, Yoshihiro Ono, Takafumi Sato, Yosuke Inoue, Yu Takahashi, Akio Saiura, and Hiromichi Ito have no actual or potential conflicts of interest or any support funding in relation to the submission of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watanabe, G., Ushida, Y., Oba, A. et al. Impact of Tumor Size on the Outcomes of Patients with Resectable Distal Pancreatic Cancer: Lessons Learned from a Series of 158 Radical Resections. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 378–388 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10560-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10560-7

Navigation