Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Revised environmental Kuznets Curve in CEE countries. Evidence from panel threshold models for economic sectors

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent environmental debates in the European Green Deal to reduce pollution determine the reconsideration of the relationship between economic development and environmental quality. In this context, this paper explains the GHG emissions in few Central and Eastern European countries (CEEs) (Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary, Slovak Republic, Czech Republic and Romania) in the period 1990–2019 and proposes suitable economic policies to reduce pollution. Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) and renewable energy Kuznets Curve (RKC) are considered in a methodological framework based on panel threshold and dynamic panel models. The analysis based on GHG emissions from all economic sectors and GHG emissions from agriculture indicates similarities and differences related to the impact of economic indicators on pollution. The results of estimations indicated an inverted N-shaped relationship between GDP and GHG emissions and an N-shaped pattern between value added in agriculture and pollution. The U-shaped RKC was confirmed for overall economy and for agriculture. The policy proposals based on empirical findings promote sustainable development in the analysed states by reducing pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data are available by request.

References

  • Akram R, Chen F, Khalid F, Ye Z, Majeed MT (2020) Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions: evidence from developing countries. J Clean Prod 247:119122

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Solarin SA (2016) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in seven regions: The role of renewable energy. Ecol Indic 67:267–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali MU, Gong Z, Ali MU, Wu X, Yao C (2020) Fossil energy consumption, economic development, inward FDI impact on CO2 emissions in Pakistan: testing EKC hypothesis through ARDL model. Int J Financ Econ

  • Ali S, Yusop Z, Kaliappan SR, Chin L (2021) Trade-environment nexus in OIC countries: fresh insights from environmental Kuznets curve using GHG emissions and ecological footprint. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(4):4531–4548

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2017) Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: an ethical dilemma. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:808–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arminen H, Menegaki AN (2019) Corruption, climate and the energy-nvironment- growth Nexus. Energy Economics 80:621–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Arto I, Dietzenbacher E (2014) Drivers of the growth in global greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Sci Technol 48(10):5388–5394

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Assi AF, Isiksal AZ, Tursoy T (2021) Renewable energy consumption, financial development, environmental pollution, and innovations in the ASEAN+ 3 group: Evidence from (P-ARDL) model. Renew Energy 165:689–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Atici C (2009) Carbon emissions in Central and Eastern Europe: environmental Kuznets curve and implications for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 17(3):155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Aye GC, Edoja PE (2017) Effect of economic growth on CO2 emission in developing countries: Evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model. Cogent Econ Finance 5(1):1379239

    Google Scholar 

  • Baležentis T, Streimikiene D, Zhang T, Liobikiene G (2019) The role of bioenergy in greenhouse gas emission reduction in EU countries: An Environmental Kuznets Curve modelling. Resour Conserv Recycl 142:225–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltrán-Esteve M, Picazo-Tadeo AJ (2017) Assessing environmental performance in the European Union: Eco-innovation versus catching-up. Energy Policy 104:240–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluszcz A (2019) Decoupling economic growth from emissions in Poland on the background of EU countries. In IOP Conference Series. Earth Environ Sci 221(1):012119

    Google Scholar 

  • Bölük G, Mert M (2014) Fossil & renewable energy consumption, GHGs (greenhouse gases) and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of EU (European Union) countries. Energy 74:439–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini V, Martini C (2010) A modified environmental Kuznets curve for sustainable development assessment using panel data. Int J Global Environ Issues 10(1-2):84–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish M, Ginta TL, Habib K, Carou D, Rani AMA, Saha BB (2017) Thermal analysis during turning of AZ31 magnesium alloy under dry and cryogenic conditions. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 91(5):2855–2868

    Google Scholar 

  • de Souza Mendonça AK, Barni GDAC, Moro MF, Bornia AC, Kupek E, Fernandes L (2020) Hierarchical modeling of the 50 largest economies to verify the impact of GDP, population and renewable energy generation in CO2 emissions. Sustain Prod Consump 22:58–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Destek MA, Aslan A (2020) Disaggregated renewable energy consumption and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries. Renew Energy 151:1298–1306

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94:429–439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460

    Google Scholar 

  • Europe (2020) A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth [online], [cited 17

  • European Union (2018) Renewable energy directive, European union information Website. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/renewable-energy/renewable.energydirective

  • Fernández-Amador O, Francois JF, Oberdabernig DA, Tomberger P (2017) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: An assessment based on production and consumption emission inventories. Ecol Econ 135:269–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes (2018) Poland's path to tackling climate change: 40% fewer emissions, $26 billion annual savings by 2050. https://www.forbes.com/sites/energyinnovation/2018/03/20/polands-path-to-tackling-climate-change-40-fewer-emissions-26-billion-annual-savings-by-2050/?sh=c572e6d1b56e

  • Gielen D, Boshell F, Saygin D, Bazilian MD, Wagner N, Gorini R (2019) The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strateg Rev 24:38e50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griscom BW, Adams J, Ellis PW, Houghton RA, Lomax G, Miteva DA, Schlesinger WH, Shoch D, Siikamäki JV, Smith P, Woodbury P, Zganjar C, Blackman A, Campari J, Conant RT, Delgado C, Elias P, Gopalakrishna T, Hamsik MR, Herrero M, Kiesecker J, Landis E, Laestadius L, Leavitt SM, Minnemeyer S, Polasky S, Potapov P, Putz FE, Sanderman J, Silvius M, Wollenberg E, Fargione J (2017) Natural climate solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(44):11645–11650

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guillet R (2010) Energy and economical growth: overview and global challenges. Environ Eng Manag J 9(10)

  • Gupta S (2015) Decoupling: a step toward sustainable development with reference to OECD countries. Int J Sustain Deve World Ecol 22(6):510–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Wiedenhofer D, Pauliuk S, Krausmann F, Müller DB, Fischer-Kowalski M (2019) Contributions of sociometabolic research to sustainability science. Nature Sustain 2(3):173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Wiedenhofer D, Virág D, Kalt G, Plank B, Brockway P, Fishman T, Hausknost D, Krausmann F, Leon-Gruchalski B, Mayer A, Pichler M, Schaffartzik A, Sousa T, Streeck J, Creutzig F (2020) A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights. Environ Res Lett 15(6):065003

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. J Econ 93(2):345–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson T, Victor PA (2016) Does slow growth lead to rising inequality? Some theoretical reflections and numerical simulations. Ecol Econ 121:206–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Jebli MB, Farhani S, Guesmi K (2020) Renewable energy, CO2 emissions and value added: Empirical evidence from countries with different income levels. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 53:402–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Kais S, Ben Mbarek M (2017) Dynamic relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in three North African countries. Int J Sustain Energy 36:840–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2015.1102910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasman A, Duman YS (2015) CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis. Econ Model 44:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koirala R, Gunugunuri KR, Pratsinis SE, Smirniotis PG (2011) Effect of zirconia doping on the structure and stability of CaO-based sorbents for CO2 capture during extended operating cycles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 115(50):24804–24812

  • Krausmann F, Wiedenhofer D, Haberl H (2020) Growing stocks of buildings, infrastructures and machinery as key challenge for compliance with climate targets. Glob Environ Chang 61:102034

  • Kremer S, Bick A, Nautz D (2013) Inflation and growth: new evidence from a dynamic panel threshold analysis. Empir Econ 44(2):861–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapinskienė G, Peleckis K, Slavinskaitė N (2017) Energy consumption, economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union countries. J Bus Econ Manag 18(6):1082–1097

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazăr D, Minea A, Purcel AA (2019) Pollution and economic growth: Evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. Energy Econ 81:1121–1131

    Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Wang Y, Zhao D (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve in China: new evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Energy Policy 91:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Liobikienė G, Butkus M, Bernatonienė J (2016) Drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in the Baltic states: decomposition analysis related to the implementation of Europe 2020 strategy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:309–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Liobikienė G, Mandravickaitė J, Krepštulienė D, Bernatonienė J, Savickas A (2017) Lithuanian achievements in terms of CO2 emissions based on production side in the context of the EU-27. Technol Econ Dev Econ 23(3):483–503

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Menéndez AJ, Pérez R, Moreno B (2014) Environmental costs and renewable energy: Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve. J Environ Manag 145:368–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Minx JC, Lamb WF, Callaghan MW, Fuss S, Hilaire J, Creutzig F et al (2018) Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis. Environ Res Lett 13(6):063001

    Google Scholar 

  • Moutinho V, Robaina M (2016) Is the share of renewable energy sources determining the CO2 kWh and income relation in electricity generation?. Renew Sust Energ Rev 65:902–914

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 38:661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(9):3220–3225

    Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK (2018) Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Clean Prod 187:770–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Smith LV, Yamagata T (2013) Panel unit root tests in the presence of a multifactor error structure. J Econ 175(2):94–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman HU, Ghazali A, Bhatti GA, Khan SU (2020) Role of economic growth, financial development, trade, energy and FDI in environmental Kuznets curve for Lithuania: evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach. Eng Econ 31(1):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Robaina-Alves M, Moutinho V, Macedo P (2015) A new frontier approach to model the eco-efficiency in European countries. J Clean Prod 103:562–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogelj J, Huppmann D, Krey V, Riahi K, Clarke L, Gidden M, Nicholls Z, Meinshausen M (2019) A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal. Nature 573(7774):357–363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez LF, Stern DI (2016) Drivers of industrial and non-industrial greenhouse gas emissions. Ecol Econ 124:17–24 Available from http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahnazi R, Shabani ZD (2021) The effects of renewable energy, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in the EU. Renew Energy 169:293–307

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simionescu M, Bilan Y, Zawadzki P, Wojciechowski A, Rabe M (2021) GHG Emissions Mitigation in the European Union Based on Labor Market Changes. Energies 14:465. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Shahbaz M (2018) Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: role of renewable energy generation in India. Renew Energy 119:703–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Shahbaz M, Sengupta T (2018) Renewable energy policies and contradictions in causality: a case of Next 11 countries. J Clean Prod 197:73e84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solilová V, Nerudová D (2015) Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions and related aspects: case of the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 63(1):281–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Štreimikienė D, Balezentis T (2016) Kaya identity for analysis of the main drivers of GHG emissions and feasibility to implement EU “20–20–20” targets in the Baltic States. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58:1108–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiawan Y, Managi S (2016) The environmental Kuznets curve in Indonesia: Exploring the potential of renewable energy. Energy Policy 98:187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf S, Jonas T, Jahel M, Jaeger C (2021) The European Green Deal—More Than Climate Neutrality. Intereconomics 56(2):99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-0963-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood R, Stadler K, Simas M, Bulavskaya T, Giljum S, Lutter S, Tukker A (2018) Growth in environmental footprints and environmental impacts embodied in trade: resource efficiency indicators from EXIOBASE3. J Ind Ecol 22(3):553–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao S, Zhang S, Zhang X (2019) Renewable energy, carbon emission and economic growth: A revised environmental Kuznets Curve perspective. J Clean Prod 235:1338–1352

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoundi Z (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72:1067–1075

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Economic Forecasting of the Romanian Academy, 13, Calea 13 Septembrie, 050711, Bucharest, Romania

    Mihaela Simionescu

Authors
  1. Mihaela Simionescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The author wrote the entire paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihaela Simionescu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Ethical approval is not needed in this case.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication is not needed in this case.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simionescu, M. Revised environmental Kuznets Curve in CEE countries. Evidence from panel threshold models for economic sectors. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 60881–60899 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14905-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14905-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation