Abstract
Corporate social responsibility reporting is the presentation of economic, environmental and social performance of enterprises in annual reports or in different reports. The corporate social responsibility report enables the business to communicate with stakeholders and is effective in their learning and decision-making processes. In this study, primarily corporate social responsibility reporting is explained theoretically. Subsequently, corporate social responsibility reports of glass manufacturing companies in Istanbul Chamber of Industry 500 and web pages of non-reporting companies were examined according to content analysis method. As a result of the research, it was determined that the companies of SISECAM Group, the global brand of the glass sector, disclosed their economic, social, environmental indicators and policies in both sustainability reports and annual reports and on the official Web site.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altınay A (2016) Entegre Raporlama ve Sürdürülebilirlik Muhasebesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 25:7
Bernal-Conesa J, Briones-Peñalverb A, DeNieves-Nieto C (2017) The integration of CSR management systems and their influence on the performance of technology companies. Euro J Manag Bus Econ 25:121–132
BIST sürdürülebilirlik endeksi. http://www.borsaistanbul.com/endeksler/bist-pay-endeksleri/surdurulebilirlik-endeksi. 17 June 2019
Büyükşalvarcı A, Şapçılar M, Uyaroğlu A (2016) Kurumsal Oteller ve Sosyal Sorumluluk Projelerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi 12:187–194
Crisostomo V, Freire F, Vasconcellos F (2011) Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil. Soc Respons J 7:295–309
EU Green Paper. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2001/EN/1-2001-366-EN-1-0.Pdf. 11 Mar 2019
Fidan Z, Acar Z (2017) Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Çalışmalarında İşbirliği: Akbank Garanti Bankası Ve Türkiye İş Bankası Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Selçuk İletişim 9:40–63
GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf. 11 Mar 2019
Gürel T (2010) Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumlulukta Yeni Yaklaşımlar ve Tartışılan Konular. Selçuk Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi. Cilt:6, Sayı:3, 114
Gücenme Gençoğlu Ü, Aytaç A (2016) Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Açısından Entegre Raporlamanın Önemi ve BIST Uygulamaları. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi 72:51–65
https://www.parkcam.com.tr. 17 Mar 2019
https://www.duzcecam.com.tr. 17 Mar 2019
https://www.sisecam.com.tr. 17 Mar 2019
İçigen E, Çevik B, Doğan O (2016) Türkiye’de Faaliyet Gösteren Uluslararası Konaklama İşletmelerinin Sosyal Sorumluluk Uygulamalarının İncelenmesi. Mediterranean J Human VI:299–310
ISO Standards. https://www.iso.org/standards.html. 03 Mar 2019
Jhunjhunwala S (2014) Beyond financial reporting-international integrated reporting framework. Ind J Corporate Gov 7(1):73–80
Juscius V, Sneideriene A, Griauslyte J (2014) Assessment of the benefits of corporate social responsibility reports as one of the marketing tools. Reg Form Dev Stud 11(3):89
Karadeniz E, Ünlübulduk S (2018) Dünyada Marka Değeri En Yüksek Havayolu İşletmeleri İle Borsa İstanbul Havayolu İşletmelerinde Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Faaliyetlerinin Analizi. Seyahat Ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi 15:370–385
Leitoniene S, Sapkauskiene A, Dagiliene L (2015).Theoretical issues and practical implications of corporate social accounting and reporting in Lithuania. Proc Econ Fin 32:334
Maqbooln S, Zameer M (2018) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: an empirical analysis of Indian Banks. Future Bus J 4:84–93
Montiel I (2008) Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability separate pasts, common futures. Organ Environ 21(3):245
Sert N (2012) Türkiye’de Özel Sektörün Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluk Anlayışına İlişkin Yarar Algısı: Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Faaliyetlerinin Duyurulmasında Web Sitelerinin Kullanılması. Online Acad J Inform Technol 9:34
Selçuk E, Kiymaz H (2017) Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: evidence from an emerging market. Account Fin Res 6(4):42–50
SPK Kurumsal Yönetim. https://www.spk.gov.tr/Sayfa/Index/10. 17 Feb 2019
Sıla I, Cek K (2017) The impact of environmental, social and governance dimensions of corporate social responsibility on economic performance: Australian evidence. Pro Comput Sci 120:797–804
The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf. 08 June 2019
Türkiye’de Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Değerlendirme Raporu 2008. http://www.iye.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/KSS_Degerlendirme_Raporu_2008.pdf. 02 Apr 2019
Türkiye Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Derneği. https://www.kssd.org. 05 Mar 2019
TÜSİAD (2015) Kurumsal Raporlamada Yeni Dönem: Entegre Raporlama, Yayın No: T/201510-567, ISBN 978-605-165-012-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eskin, İ. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility Report: Examination of Glass Manufacturing Companies on Istanbul Chamber of Industry 500. In: Çalıyurt, K.T. (eds) New Approaches to CSR, Sustainability and Accountability, Volume II. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6808-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6808-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6807-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6808-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)