Abstract
Critical infrastructure is becoming dependent on Internet of Things (IoT) sensors. These sensors measure various physical values and send them via a communication network in the form of electronic data. Data is then used by a management center for detailed analysis and system control. This technology can be used in various scenarios, from smart grid networks to autonomous vehicles. All these scenarios require innovative technologies in order to stay productive, efficient and resource friendly. These technologies include software-defined networks, which support network programmability. This allows rapid deployment of innovative applications, which can be dynamically adjusted as needs of the network change. The adjustment requires only a software modification which provides scalability of the solution. The key part of such a solution is quality of the control software application and the system configuration.
Currently, there is no unified methodology which would summarize the best practices for developing such a system. This paper provides a list of system requirements for software-defined IoT networks for critical infrastructure. This list is one of the key phases in every system development process. Use of the list can help with development of high quality, scalable, efficient, and secure SDN systems, which can be deployed in critical infrastructure scenarios.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ISO/IEC 25010:2011. https://www.iso.org/standard/35733.html. Accessed 30 June 2020
ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management. https://www.iso.org/isoiec-27001-information-security.html. Accessed 23 June 2020
ISO/IEC 29100:2011. https://www.iso.org/standard/45123.html. Accessed 30 June 2020
Openflow switch specification, version 1.5.1 (protocol version 0x06). https://www.opennetworking.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/openflow-switch-v1.5.1.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2020
Industroyer: Biggest malware threat to critical infrastructure since Stuxnet (2017). https://www.eset.com/int/industroyer/. Accessed 01 July 2020
Bauer, M., et al.: Internet of Things - architecture IoT-a deliverable D1.5 - final architectural reference model for the IoT v3.0 (2013)
Eckhoff, D., Wagner, I.: Privacy in the smart city-applications, technologies, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 20(1), 489–516 (2018)
Finn, R.L., Wright, D., Friedewald, M.: Seven types of privacy. In: Gutwirth, S., Leenes, R., de Hert, P., Poullet, Y. (eds.) European Data Protection: Coming of Age, pp. 3–32. Springer, Dordrecht (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5170-5_1
Hoepman, J.-H.: Privacy design strategies. In: Cuppens-Boulahia, N., Cuppens, F., Jajodia, S., Abou El Kalam, A., Sans, T. (eds.) SEC 2014. IAICT, vol. 428, pp. 446–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55415-5_38
Holik, F.: Meeting smart city latency demands with SDN. In: Huk, M., Maleszka, M., Szczerbicki, E. (eds.) ACIIDS 2019. SCI, vol. 830, pp. 43–54. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14132-5_4
Holik, F., Broadbent, M., Findrik, M., Smith, P., Race, N.: Safe and secure software-defined networks for smart electricity substations. In: Sitek, P., Pietranik, M., Krótkiewicz, M., Srinilta, C. (eds.) ACIIDS 2020. CCIS, vol. 1178, pp. 179–191. Springer, Singapore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3380-8_16
Jararweh, Y., et al.: SDIoT: a software defined based Internet of Things framework. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 6(4), 453–461 (2015)
Kakarontzas, G., Anthopoulos, L., Chatzakou, D., Vakali, A.: A conceptual enterprise architecture framework for smart cities: a survey based approach. In: 2014 11th International Conference on e-Business (ICE-B), pp. 47–54 (2014)
Noguchi, M., Ueda, H.: An analysis of the actual status of recent cyberattacks on critical infrastructures. NEC Tech. J. 12, 19–24 (2018)
Lallo, R., et al.: Leveraging SDN to monitor critical infrastructure networks in a smarter way. In: 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management, pp. 608–611 (2017)
Vilalta, R., et al.: Improving security in Internet of Things with software defined networking. In: 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–6 (2016)
Rathore, M.M., Ahmad, A., Paul, A., Rho, S.: Urban planning and building smart cities based on the Internet of Things using big data analytics. Comput. Netw. 101, 63–80 (2016)
Lee, R.M., Assante, M.J., Conway, T.: Analysis of the cyber attack on the Ukrainian power grid. Technical report (2016). https://ics.sans.org/media/E-ISAC_SANS_Ukraine_DUC_5.pdf. Accessed 01 July 2020
Schlegel, R., Obermeier, S., Schneider, J.: A security evaluation of IEC 62351. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 34, 197–204 (2016)
Varadharajan, V., Tupakula, U.: Software defined networks based security architecture for IoT infrastructures. Technical report, The University of Newcastle (2019). https://isif.asia/software-defined-networks-based-security-architecture-for-iot-infrastructures/. Accessed 02 July 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Holik, F. (2021). System Requirements of Software-Defined IoT Networks for Critical Infrastructure. In: Yildirim Yayilgan, S., Bajwa, I.S., Sanfilippo, F. (eds) Intelligent Technologies and Applications. INTAP 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1382. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71711-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71711-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71710-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71711-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)