Skip to main content
Log in

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and (Morbid) Obesity or Low Body Weight: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Oral anticoagulants are crucial for preventing systemic thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF), with guidelines preferring non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the general AF population. However, as NOACs are administered in fixed doses, concerns of unintentional underdosing in morbidly obese patients and unintentional overdosing in underweight patients have emerged. Therefore, a critical appraisal of the benefit-risk profile of NOACs in AF patients across the body weight spectrum is needed.

Methods and Results

After searching Medline, this systematic review discusses the impact of body weight on the risk-benefit profile of NOACs versus VKAs. The meta-analysis demonstrated that NOAC use in obese and class III obese AF patients (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 and ≥ 40 kg/m2, respectively) was associated with significantly lower stroke/systemic embolism (stroke/SE) risks (RR 0.82, 95%CI [0.71–0.96] and RR 0.75, 95%CI [0.64–0.87], respectively), similar to lower major bleeding risks (RR 0.83, 95%CI [0.69–1.00] and RR 0.74, 95%CI [0.57–0.95], respectively) and similar mortality risks (RR 0.92, 95%CI [0.73–1.15] and RR 1.17, 95%CI [0.83–1.64], respectively) compared to VKAs. In AF patients ≤ 60 kg, significantly lower stroke/SE (RR 0.63, 95%CI [0.56–0.71]) and major bleeding risks (RR 0.71, 95%CI [0.62–0.80]), but similar mortality risks (RR 0.68, 95%CI [0.42–1.10]), were observed for NOAC- versus VKA-treated patients.

Conclusion

The benefit-risk profile of NOACs seems preserved in (morbidly) obese AF patients and patients with low body weight. However, more data are needed on underweight AF patients (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2) and on differences between NOACs in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplemental materials.

References

  1. Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS, Albaladejo P, Antz M, Desteghe L, et al. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(16):1330–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham study. Stroke. 1991;22(8):983–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Wiviott SD, Halperin JL, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2093–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eliquis. Summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/eliquis-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2020

  8. Lixiana. Summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/lixiana-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2020

  9. Pradaxa. Summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/pradaxa-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2020

  10. Xarelto. Summary of product characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/xarelto-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2020

  11. World Health Organization (WHO) Body mass index (BMI) classification. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi. Accessed 10 July 2020.

  12. Upreti VV, Wang J, Barrett YC, Byon W, Boyd RA, Pursley J, et al. Effect of extremes of body weight on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of apixaban in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;76(6):908–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamashita T, Koretsune Y, Yasaka M, Inoue H, Kawai Y, Yamaguchi T, et al. Randomized, multicenter, warfarin-controlled phase II study of edoxaban in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2012;76(8):1840–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boriani G, Ruff CT, Kuder JF, Shi M, Lanz HJ, Rutman H, et al. Relationship between body mass index and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with edoxaban or warfarin in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(19):1541–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reilly PA, Lehr T, Haertter S, Connolly SJ, Yusuf S, Eikelboom JW, et al. The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients: the RE-LY Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(4):321–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kubitza D, Becka M, Zuehlsdorf M, Mueck W. Body weight has limited influence on the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, or pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;47(2):218–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hohnloser SH, Fudim M, Alexander JH, Wojdyla DM, Ezekowitz JA, Hanna M, et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and extremes in body weight. Circulation. 2019;139(20):2292–300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kmet L, Lee R, Cook L (2004) The quality assessment tool ‘QUALSYST’ from the “Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields”. https://www.ihe.ca/advanced-search/standard-quality-assessment-criteria-for-evaluating-primary-research-papers-from-a-variety-of-fields. Accessed 1 August 2020

  19. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals. FDA Briefing Information, Dabigatran Etexilate Mesylate Capsules, for the September 20, 2010 Meeting of the Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee. https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170405212218/https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/CardiovascularandRenalDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM247244.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2020

  20. Balla SR, Cyr DD, Lokhnygina Y, Becker RC, Berkowitz SD, Breithardt G, et al. Relation of risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation to body mass index (from patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin in the rivaroxaban once daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation trial). Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(12):1989–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sandhu RK, Ezekowitz J, Andersson U, Alexander JH, Granger CB, Halvorsen S, et al. The 'obesity paradox’ in atrial fibrillation: observations from the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for reduction in stroke and other thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation) trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2869–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eikelboom JW, Wallentin L, Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz M, Healey JS, Oldgren J, et al. Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation. 2011;123(21):2363–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Proietti M, Guiducci E, Cheli P, Lip GY. Is there an obesity paradox for outcomes in atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist Oral anticoagulant trials. Stroke. 2017;48(4):857–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Malik AH, Yandrapalli S, Shetty S, Aronow WS, Jain D, Frishman WH, et al. Impact of weight on the efficacy and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Europace. 2020;22(3):361–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Costa OS, Beyer-Westendorf J, Ashton V, Milentijevic D, Moore KT, Bunz TJ, et al. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in obese nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients: analysis of electronic health record data. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36(7):1081–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Deitelzweig S, Keshishian A, Kang A, et al. Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants among NVAF patients with obesity: insights from the ARISTOPHANES study. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1633. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061633.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Peterson ED, Ashton V, Chen YW, Wu B, Spyropoulos AC. Comparative effectiveness, safety, and costs of rivaroxaban and warfarin among morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2019;212:113–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Patil T, Lebrecht M. A single center retrospective cohort study evaluating use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in morbidly obese veteran population. Thromb Res. 2020;192:124–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Patti G, Pecen L, Manu MC, Huber K, Rohla M, Renda G, et al. Thromboembolic and bleeding risk in obese patients with atrial fibrillation according to different anticoagulation strategies. Int J Cardiol. 2020;318:67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kido K, Shimizu M, Shiga T, Hashiguchi M. Meta-analysis comparing direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in morbidly obese patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2020;126:23–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Boehringer Ingelheim. Pradaxa (dabigatran), U.S. Food and Drug Administration Highlights of Prescribing Information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/022512s027lbl.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2020

  32. Xarelto (rivaroxaban). U.S. food and drug administration highlights of prescribing information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/022406s028lbl.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2020

  33. Savaysa (edoxaban). U.S. food and drug administration highlights of prescribing information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/206316lbl.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2020

  34. Lee SR, Choi EK, Park CS, Han KD, Jung JH, Oh S, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and low body weight. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(8):919–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Russo V, Attena E, Di Maio M, et al. Non-vitamin K vs vitamin K oral anticoagulants in patients aged > 80 year with atrial fibrillation and low body weight. Eur J Clin Investig. 2020;50(11):e13335. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hori M, Connolly SJ, Zhu J, Liu LS, Lau CP, Pais P, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin: effects on ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes and bleeding in Asians and non-Asians with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2013;44(7):1891–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chiang C-E, Wang K-L, Lip GYH. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an Asian perspective. Thromb Haemost. 2014;111(5):789–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Chao TF, Chen SA, Ruff CT, Hamershock RA, Mercuri MF, Antman EM, et al. Clinical outcomes, edoxaban concentration, and anti-factor Xa activity of Asian patients with atrial fibrillation compared with non-Asians in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(19):1518–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Piccini JP, Hellkamp AS, Lokhnygina Y, Patel MR, Harrell FE, Singer DE, et al. Relationship between time in therapeutic range and comparative treatment effect of rivaroxaban and warfarin: results from the ROCKET AF trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(2):e000521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) [grant number 11C0820N to Maxim Grymonprez].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Maxim Grymonprez and Lies Lahousse contributed to the concept and design of the systematic review. Maxim Grymonprez performed the literature search, data analysis, interpretation and writing. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Maxim Grymonprez. Tine De Backer, Stephane Steurbaut, Koen Boussery and Lies Lahousse revised the manuscript critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxim Grymonprez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 1342 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grymonprez, M., De Backer, T.L., Steurbaut, S. et al. Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and (Morbid) Obesity or Low Body Weight: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 36, 749–761 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-020-07122-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-020-07122-6

Keywords

Navigation