Introduction

Cytokine inhibitors have transformed the outcome of many chronic inflammatory diseases. A decade has passed since the approval of anti-IL-6 receptor (anti-IL-6R) therapy, which is now used worldwide in various rheumatic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD), giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis, as well as other conditions such as Castleman disease and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). To mark this anniversary, we discuss the 40-year history of translational research into IL-6 biology and the subsequent development of therapies targeting this pivotal cytokine pathway, which helps to inform future biological and clinical research.

From signalling to drug discovery

The journey from the discovery of IL-6 biology to the development of an IL-6 pathway inhibitor as a potential treatment for various diseases started coincidentally with the meeting of two research groups in Japan. In 1973, researchers at Osaka University led by Tadamitsu Kishimoto first reported that a soluble factor secreted by T cells was important for antibody production by B cells (Fig. 1); subsequently, this soluble factor was cloned as IL-6, which turned out to have various roles in several autoimmune diseases1,2. At the same time, researchers at Chugai Pharmaceutical were exploring new avenues for drug development for autoimmune diseases. In the late 1980s, the two groups started to collaborate to further advance the understanding of the biological role of IL-6 in various autoimmune diseases and the development of IL-6 inhibitors as treatment options. To increase their collaborative potential, the two research groups even moved to adjoining laboratories at Osaka University. The university researchers led efforts to identify IL-6 signalling mechanisms and the biological effects of IL-6, whereas the company focused on developing and characterizing IL-6 inhibitors as potential new treatments for autoimmune diseases3,4,5.

Fig. 1: Timeline of the discovery of IL-6 and IL-6-targeted therapies.
figure 1

The timeline shows progress in the field of IL-6 pathway inhibition following the initial identification of a B cell stimulation factor in 1973, and the more definitive biochemical and molecular studies carried out in the 1980s and 1990s, to clinical trials and approvals in various diseases in the 2000s and up to the present day. AOSD, adult-onset Still’s disease; AS, ankylosing spondylitis; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; GCA, giant cell arteritis; gp130, glycoprotein 130; IL-6R, IL-6 receptor; pJIA, polyarticular course juvenile idiopathic arthritis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; sJIA, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SSc, systemic sclerosis.

Full size image

The traditional approach of searching for small-molecule inhibitors proved challenging when the research team found that IL-6 signal transduction occurred through a hexameric high-affinity complex of IL-6, IL-6R and glycoprotein 130 (gp130) (Fig. 2a). Moreover, both soluble IL-6R (sIL-6R) and membrane-bound IL-6R (mIL-6R) can be part of the hexameric complex; hence, the binding region of IL-6–IL-6R–gp130 was considered too complex and broad for a small-molecule compound to inhibit the IL-6 signal pathway6,7. The aforementioned mIL-6R and sIL-6R forms are associated with so-called classical signalling and trans-signalling pathways, respectively, the details of which and corresponding avenues for drug development have been reviewed extensively elsewhere4. Both signalling routes involve phosphorylation of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1), JAK2 and tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2), which can also be targeted therapeutically with different molecules but are not the focus of this article4. The decision to target IL-6R rather than IL-6 itself was made, taking into consideration that concentrations of the receptor have less interpatient variability than concentrations of IL-6, potentially simplifying dose and regimen selection8,9. With concurrent advances in biotechnology, the two groups decided to develop a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting IL-6R10,11,12. The resulting humanized antibody to IL-6R, tocilizumab, binds to mIL-6R and sIL-6R and inhibits IL-6 signalling by preventing IL-6 from binding to IL-6R11,12. The therapeutic benefit of this antibody to IL-6R led to the development of several antibodies to IL-6 (sirukumab, olokizumab and clazakizumab).

Fig. 2: Cell signalling pathways and the physiological role of IL-6 in diseases.
figure 2

IL-6 participates in a broad spectrum of biological events, such as synovial inflammation, immune responses, haematopoiesis and acute-phase reactions. a | IL-6 binds to IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) and glycoprotein 130 (gp130) to form a hexameric complex. Both membrane-bound IL-6R and soluble IL-6R can be part of the hexameric complex and are associated with the classical signalling and trans-signalling pathways, respectively. Intracellular signalling pathways involve the Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway. Pharmacological inhibitors of IL-6 signalling prevent IL-6 from binding to IL-6R by targeting either the cytokine itself or the receptor. b | In the context of disease, IL-6 can have both local inflammatory and systemic effects. Some of the manifestations of the diseases for which IL-6 inhibitors are approved could be explained by the effects of IL-6, on the basis of both preclinical and clinical data. IL-6 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), Castleman disease, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis and cytokine release syndrome, among others. c | As IL-6 has multiple roles in the dysfunction of the immune and inflammatory systems, anti-IL-6R therapy could relieve various symptoms such as fever, fatigue, pain, joint destruction, anaemia and others. CRP, C-reactive protein; MMP, matrix metalloprotease; RANKL, receptor activator of NF-κB ligand; SAA, serum amyloid A; Teff cell, effector T cell; Treg cell, regulatory T cell; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Full size image

Initial therapeutic applications

As IL-6 is well known to have various physiological roles, in considering IL-6 as a therapeutic target, its homeostatic role versus its pathogenic role in various autoimmune diseases was extensively debated3,4. However, utilizing cell-based assays, animal models and ex vivo serum and tissue analyses, scientists identified several candidate diseases that might benefit from the use of IL-6 inhibition (Table 1).

Table 1 Evidence for the effects of IL-6 inhibition on diseases
Full size table

A 1988 publication reported that IL-6 is an important growth factor in myeloma cells13. Oncologists in France conducted an open-label clinical trial of a mouse anti-IL-6 in patients with multiple myeloma, the second most common type of blood cancer after leukaemia14. Although none of the patients treated had an improved outcome or achieved remission in the initial report of the trial, post-hoc analysis revealed that treatment with the anti-IL-6 showed some efficacy in those patients who produced low concentrations of IL-6 (ref.15). More than 20 years later, a clinical trial evaluated whether the addition of a different chimeric monoclonal antibody to IL-6, siltuximab, to the bortezomib–melphalan–prednisone regimen would be beneficial to patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; however, this IL-6 inhibitor also failed to improve outcomes16.

In 1989, a publication described constitutive overproduction of IL-6 from the germinal centres of hyperplastic lymph nodes in patients with Castleman disease, a lymphoproliferative disorder, and a correlation of serum IL-6 concentrations with clinical abnormalities17. Consistent with these observations, transgenic mice carrying the human Il6 gene, under the control of an immunoglobulin promoter, developed clinical features of Castleman disease including splenomegaly, lymph node enlargement and high concentrations of IL-6 and IgG18,19. In a 1994 case report, administration of a mouse neutralizing antibody to IL-6 to a patient with Castleman disease seemed to be therapeutically effective20. Tocilizumab also had positive effects in a small case series of seven patients in 2000 and in a multicentre, prospective, open-label study in 2005 that included 28 patients with Castleman disease21,22. In the prospective study, bi-weekly treatment with tocilizumab consistently alleviated lymphadenopathy and improved all inflammatory parameters over 60 weeks22. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of siltuximab also showed efficacy in this indication23. Subsequently, tocilizumab was approved for the treatment of Castleman disease in Japan and siltuximab was approved for this indication in various countries.

A 1995 study reported that serum concentrations of IL-6 and sIL-6R were elevated in patients with Crohn’s disease, a type of inflammatory bowel disease, and correlated with C-reactive protein levels24. On the basis of these observations, tocilizumab was evaluated in a placebo-controlled phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) with patients with active Crohn’s disease (defined as a Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score of ≥150 (ref.25)). The primary end point, a reduction of the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index score of ≥70 points, was met by 80% of the patients who received bi-weekly tocilizumab, compared with 31% of the placebo-treated patients, demonstrating the substantial efficacy of tocilizumab. However, the development of tocilizumab for Crohn’s disease did not proceed owing to rare reports of gastrointestinal perforations observed in concurrent clinical trials in arthritis and because of an increased understanding of the homeostatic role of IL-6 in the intestinal epithelium26. Together, these findings suggested that patients with Crohn’s disease might be at increased risk of potential detrimental effects of IL-6 inhibition.

IL-6 inhibition in RA

The development path for an IL-6 inhibitor for the treatment of RA, the most common chronic autoimmune disorder that primarily affects joints, began in the early 1990s, when cell-based experiments revealed that IL-6 might be involved in osteoporosis, cartilage destruction and synovial inflammation associated with RA27,28,29,30. In mouse models of collagen-induced and antigen-induced arthritis, IL-6 inhibition prevented the development of arthritis but did not ameliorate arthritis once the disease was established31,32,33. In a 1993 study, the administration of a mouse monoclonal antibody to IL-6 to patients with RA resulted in improvements of disease symptoms and laboratory measures of disease activity, although the effects were transient34. In 2000, the efficacy and tolerability of tocilizumab was investigated in a case series of 11 patients with refractory RA; the treatment was well tolerated and led to both clinical and biochemical improvements35. On the basis of these results, larger and confirmatory double-blind RCTs of tocilizumab were conducted in patients with refractory RA36,37,38,39,40. Tocilizumab improved clinical signs and symptoms of RA, laboratory parameters and radiological manifestations and also ameliorated the effects of RA on patient-reported outcomes, activities of daily living and quality of life, when administered as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs)41,42,43,44,45. These and other studies led to tocilizumab receiving marketing authorization (Fig. 1) for patients with early RA who were not previously treated with methotrexate and those with established RA and an inadequate response to previous treatment with DMARDs or TNF antagonists; in these patients, tocilizumab is administered in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy if methotrexate is not tolerated or continued treatment with methotrexate is not appropriate.

A notable finding of further clinical investigation in several RCTs and real-world data was that, unlike TNF inhibitors, tocilizumab monotherapy was superior to methotrexate or other csDMARDs for reducing the signs, symptoms and radiographic progression of RA39,40,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59. In particular, a head-to-head, double-blind, double-dummy RCT found that, when used as monotherapy, tocilizumab was superior to the TNF inhibitor adalimumab in measures of disease activity and several other outcomes46. On the basis of these results, EULAR recommendations for the management of RA named IL-6 pathway inhibitors as one of the preferred treatment options for patients for whom methotrexate is inappropriate60. Interestingly, the clinical benefits of IL-6 inhibition might be attributable, in part, to the beneficial effects of IL-6 inhibition on bone and cartilage turnover, which are supported by data from prospective cohort studies showing that tocilizumab monotherapy achieves better repair of focal bone erosions than TNF inhibition in patients with RA60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70. Besides promoting joint inflammation and damage through effects on chondrocytes, osteoclasts, macrophages and fibroblasts, IL-6 mediates systemic inflammation in RA. IL-6 affects T cell and B cell differentiation and is the key driver of the acute-phase response in RA. Key symptoms and comorbidities such as pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, anaemia and cardiovascular disease can be mediated by IL-6 (refs71,72), as shown in Fig. 2c.

Since tocilizumab was approved for RA, sarilumab, an alternative monoclonal antibody to IL-6R, has also demonstrated efficacy and safety and has been approved for the treatment of RA73,74,75. Three other monoclonal antibodies to IL-6, sirukumab, olokizumab and clazakizumab, have also been tested in clinical trials in RA. In phase III RCTs that included patients with RA refractory to treatment with csDMARDs and biologic DMARDs, sirukumab was superior to placebo in improving disease activity, physical function and health-related quality of life, as well as inhibiting radiographic disease progression76,77. However, monotherapy with sirukumab was similar but not superior to adalimumab and efforts to obtain regulatory approval in RA were terminated78. Phase II trials of olokizumab demonstrated therapeutic benefit, and phase III trials are ongoing79. However, the development of clazakizumab as a treatment for RA has also been terminated.

IL-6 inhibition in JIA and AOSD

JIA is a term encompassing all forms of chronic arthritis affecting children younger than 16 years of age80. JIA exists as several different subtypes: oligoarticular JIA, polyarticular JIA, juvenile psoriatic arthritis (PsA), enthesitis-related arthritis and systemic JIA (sJIA). In sJIA, arthritis is associated with prominent systemic features, including high spiking fever, rash, serositis and inflammatory signs. This disease is further characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates, joint destruction, functional disability and growth retardation80. Concentrations of IL-6 are markedly elevated in the serum and synovial fluid of patients with sJIA, and a vast body of evidence from cell-based experiments and animal models demonstrates that IL-6 overproduction seems to explain most, if not all, of the clinical and laboratory features of the disease including fever spikes, acute-phase response, anaemia, growth retardation and systemic osteoporosis81,82,83,84,85. In 2005, clinical trials of tocilizumab in patients with sJIA conducted in the UK and Japan provided proof of principle of the efficacy of IL-6 inhibition in this severe paediatric condition86,87. Two subsequent trials of tocilizumab in >150 children with sJIA confirmed extensive improvements in the signs and symptoms of disease following treatment with tocilizumab and demonstrated the clinically relevant glucocorticoid-sparing potential of IL-6 inhibition88,89,90,91,92. The efficacy and safety of IL-6 inhibition in sJIA have also been confirmed in real-world studies93. Reversal of sJIA-associated growth retardation has also been demonstrated with IL-6 inhibition, with patients experiencing catch-up growth during treatment with tocilizumab92.

AOSD and sJIA are increasingly considered to be the same disease, with AOSD occurring in adulthood and sJIA in childhood. In a double-blind RCT of 27 patients with AOSD refractory to treatment with glucocorticoids, an ACR50 response (reflecting 50% improvement) at week 4 was achieved in ~61% of patients treated with tocilizumab, compared with ~31% of placebo-treated patients, although the difference was not statistically significant94. Patients in the tocilizumab group also had improvements in systemic symptoms and a decreased dose of glucocorticoids compared with the placebo group. On the basis of data from this trial, tocilizumab was approved for the treatment of AOSD in Japan in 2019.

Polyarticular JIA is characterized by a potentially destructive disease course. Trials of tocilizumab were undertaken in polyarticular JIA from 2009 on the basis of results obtained in RA. In a small trial in 19 patients, 100% of patients met the criteria for a good response after 48 weeks of treatment with tocilizumab95. In a pivotal phase III trial and its subsequent long-term extension study in 188 patients, inhibition of IL-6 led to sustained and clinically meaningful improvements after 2 years, and skeletal growth was also improved by treatment with tocilizumab96,97. Another antibody to IL-6R, sarilumab, is in phase II trials for polyarticular JIA98 and sJIA99.

IL-6 inhibition in SpA

Seronegative spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a group of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and PsA, with common clinical and aetiological features, such as axial and peripheral inflammatory arthritis, enthesitis and extra-articular manifestations100. The absence of the serological markers rheumatoid factor and antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptides differentiates SpA from RA. AS is a chronic, debilitating and gradually progressive inflammatory rheumatic disease that primarily affects the axial skeleton and sacroiliac joints, but can also affect the peripheral joints101. Serum IL-6 concentrations are elevated in patients with AS and correlate with disease activity102. However, tocilizumab failed to show therapeutic benefit in AS in two double-blind RCTs in 2014 (ref.103). Sarilumab was also ineffective as a treatment for AS in a 2015 RCT104. The conclusion from these RCTs is that IL-6 is not a therapeutic target in AS.

PsA is a chronic immune-mediated disease characterized by widespread musculoskeletal inflammation and is the major comorbidity associated with psoriasis105. The rationale for inhibiting IL-6 in PsA was based on a small number of studies that demonstrated elevated concentrations of IL-6 in both the serum and the synovial fluid of patients with PsA106,107. In a placebo-controlled phase II RCT, clazakizumab improved arthritis, enthesitis and dactylitis in patients with PsA, but with minimal improvements in skin disease108. Currently, development of clazakizumab for this indication seems to have been terminated.

IL-6 inhibition in SLE and SSc

In 1990, a study in NZB/W F1 mice, an animal model of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), suggested that IL-6 could have a role in the pathogenesis of immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis109. Moreover, IL-6 concentrations are elevated in serum and urine samples from patients with SLE or lupus nephritis and correlate with disease activity110,111. In an open-label phase I study in 16 patients with SLE, treatment with tocilizumab improved disease activity; notably, arthritis improved in all seven patients who had arthritis at baseline and resolved in four of them112,113. Levels of antibodies to double-stranded DNA decreased even after adjustment for the decrease in total IgG titres following tocilizumab treatment112. These changes, together with a decrease in the frequency of circulating plasma cells, suggested a specific effect of IL-6 inhibition on autoantibody-producing B cells. However, further studies with sirukumab did not demonstrate a clinically meaningful benefit of IL-6 pathway inhibition in patients with lupus nephritis or SLE114,115. These conflicting results in SLE have tempered further clinical development. Whether IL-6 inhibition might be effective for some manifestations of SLE and not others requires further studies.

IL-6 is also implicated in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). In the bleomycin-induced mouse model of SSc, IL-6 blockade reduced skin fibrosis, α-smooth-muscle actin protein expression, hydroxyproline content and myofibroblast counts116. Dermal fibroblasts from patients with SSc constitutively express more IL-6 than those from healthy controls, and serum IL-6 concentrations are elevated in patients with early SSc117,118. In a 2010 report, softening of skin sclerosis was observed in two patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc who received tocilizumab treatment119. In a double-blind phase II RCT in 87 patients with active diffuse SSc, fewer patients in the tocilizumab group had a decline in forced vital capacity compared with the placebo group, but improvements in skin thickening (measured by the modified Rodnan skin score) with tocilizumab were not statistically significant120. Results of a follow-up phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 212 patients with progressive SSc again showed a numerical reduction in skin score with tocilizumab at week 48, but the difference did not reach statistical significance121. Regarding the mean change in forced vital capacity from baseline to week 48, tocilizumab performed better than placebo, suggesting a potentially clinically important effect of tocilizumab on the preservation of lung function121.

IL-6 inhibition in vasculitis and PMR

Takayasu arteritis and GCA are chronic, potentially life-threatening, primary systemic large-vessel vasculitides122,123. Takayasu arteritis affects the aorta and its major branches in adolescents and young adults, whereas GCA affects large and medium-sized arteries and usually affects individuals above the age of 50 years.

IL-6 was implicated as an important factor in the pathogenesis of both GCA and Takayasu arteritis in the 1990s. First, the serum level of IL-6 correlated with disease activity in both diseases124,125. Second, tocilizumab improved disease signs and symptoms in patients with refractory GCA or refractory Takayasu arteritis in case series. Subsequently, a single-centre phase II RCT and a phase III multicentre, double-blind RCT investigated whether tocilizumab could sustain remission and enable glucocorticoid tapering126,127. In the phase III RCT, sustained glucocorticoid-free remission at 52 weeks was achieved in more patients treated with tocilizumab weekly (56%) or every other week (53%) (in combination with a prednisone taper over 26 weeks) than in patients who received placebo plus a prednisone taper over 26 weeks (14%) or placebo plus a prednisone taper over 52 weeks (18%)127. Consequently, tocilizumab was approved for the treatment of patients with GCA by the FDA and EMA in 2017, making this the first drug approved for the treatment of GCA other than glucocorticoids. A phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in patients with GCA is ongoing128.

In Takayasu arteritis, a double-blind RCT in Japan showed that, compared with placebo, tocilizumab treatment prolonged the time to relapse during glucocorticoid tapering129. Although the primary end point of the study was not met, tocilizumab has been approved in Japan for the treatment of Takayasu arteritis that is refractory to existing therapies.

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a disease closely related to GCA, with stiffness and muscle pain being the predominant symptoms. Several case reports and a small, prospective, open-label phase II trial of tocilizumab in patients with PMR suggested that this drug might have a steroid-sparing effect130,131. Another prospective, open-label study found tocilizumab monotherapy to be effective in new-onset PMR132. Additional trials of IL-6 pathway inhibition in PMR are ongoing, including phase III trials of tocilizumab and sarilumab133,134.

IL-6 inhibition in CRS

Tocilizumab was approved by the FDA (in 2017) and the EMA (in 2018) for the treatment of severe or life-threatening chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-induced CRS in adults and children. CAR T cells are ex vivo-modified T cells from patients with cancer that are reprogrammed to lyse tumour cells when bound to a specific cancer cell surface protein. However, ~70% of patients treated with a CD19 CAR T cell therapy develop CRS135. CRS leads to headache, fever, chills, severe nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, musculoskeletal pain, dyspnoea, hypotension and tachycardia and in severe cases can be fatal. The approval of tocilizumab for the treatment of CAR T cell-induced CRS was based on a retrospective analysis of data showing the efficacy of tocilizumab treatment in patients who developed CRS after CAR T cell therapy in prospective clinical trials136,137,138.

Other potential indications

Unravelling the therapeutic potential of IL-6 pathway inhibition for indications other than those discussed above is a matter of ongoing basic and clinical research spanning various therapeutic areas4,5. Several investigator-initiated studies are either planned or ongoing or have already been published as proof-of-concept studies. A detailed representation of all of these studies is beyond the scope of this article, but briefly, they encompass conditions such as uveitis, thyroid eye disease, neuromyelitis optica, graft-versus-host disease, erosive hand osteoarthritis, various oncological indications, depression, schizophrenia, Schnitzler syndrome, myocardial infarction, familial Mediterranean fever and COVID-19 pneumonia (caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2)5,139,140. The potential of IL-6 pathway inhibition in COVID-19 pneumonia is supported by studies in which elevated concentrations of IL-6 have been reported, together with several laboratory abnormalities suggestive of hyperinflammation, especially in patients admitted to intensive care units141. A phase II trial is ongoing in Italy142 and, in March 2020, a phase III trial was approved by the FDA143 to assess the effect of tocilizumab for severe COVID-19 pneumonia. It is hoped that findings from some of these studies will expand the application and medical value of IL-6 pathway inhibition to additional diseases in the future.

Safety of IL-6 inhibition

The safety profile of IL-6R inhibition is derived mainly from clinical trials of tocilizumab and sarilumab, as well as data from real-world registries of more than 1 million patients worldwide who have been treated with tocilizumab, including patients with RA, JIA and GCA26,53,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167.

Consistent with expectations for a biologic DMARD for RA, serious infections, including serious bacterial infections, are among the most common serious adverse events reported in clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance studies, short-term studies and open-label extension studies. The overall rate of serious infections in patients with long-term exposure to IL-6 pathway inhibitors is in line with rates seen in studies with a short duration of exposure58,145,159,161,164,165,166,167,168,169.

Treatment with IL-6 pathway inhibitors has been associated with elevations in serum concentrations of transaminases. These elevations did not seem to result in permanent or clinically evident hepatic injury in clinical trials. An increased frequency and magnitude of transaminase elevations was observed when potentially hepatotoxic drugs (for example, methotrexate) were used in combination with IL-6 pathway inhibitors164,165,166,167.

Pancreatitis is among the adverse reactions identified during post-approval use of tocilizumab and sarilumab164,166. Gastrointestinal perforations have also been associated with use of these drugs; most such events occurred in patients with pre-existing risk factors (such as pre-existing diverticulitis or use of oral glucocorticoids); thus, IL-6 pathway inhibitors should be used with caution in patients with a history of gastrointestinal perforation, intestinal ulcers or diverticulitis. The overall rate of gastrointestinal perforations in populations with long-term exposure was in line with rates seen in short-duration studies26,164,165,166,167.

Monitoring of lipid profiles and treatment of hyperlipidaemia according to clinical practice guidelines is recommended during treatment with IL-6 inhibitors, as IL-6 pathway inhibition is associated with increased serum lipid concentrations (LDL and triglycerides)154,156. Interestingly, IL-6 inhibition modifies HDL lipoproteins towards an anti-inflammatory composition; thus, the atherogenic index is unchanged170,171,172. In the ENTRACTE study, a head-to-head RCT comparing the cardiovascular safety of tocilizumab and the TNF inhibitor etanercept in RA, the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events was similar with both treatments (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.77–1.43)173.

One safety concern of biologic therapies is the development of anti-drug antibodies, which can lead to loss of efficacy and/or immune-mediated adverse reactions174. A study evaluating the immunogenicity of tocilizumab in patients with RA found that the incidence of antibodies to tocilizumab was low, regardless of the route of administration of tocilizumab or whether it was used as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs; moreover, antibodies to tocilizumab were mostly transient, and their development did not correlate with pharmacokinetics, safety events or loss of efficacy174.

For sirukumab, the FDA declined to approve the drug for use in RA owing to concerns regarding an imbalance in all-cause mortality between the sirukumab and placebo groups in phase III studies, although whether this imbalance was a true safety signal or a result of study design is unclear175. Additional studies are needed to further define the safety profile of sirukumab.

In general, monitoring for adverse events should always follow local labels, which are continuously updated with the latest safety information164,165,166,167.

Conclusions

Substantial advances have been made in translating the biology of IL-6 to the treatment of patients with autoimmune diseases. Accumulating safety data on IL-6 pathway inhibitors have provided clinicians with the necessary knowledge for assessing the risk of using them. IL-6 pathway inhibitors have shown benefit in patients with RA, JIA, AOSD, GCA, Castleman disease and CRS and might also be beneficial in patients with other autoimmune diseases and even beyond. However, the limitations of preclinical studies for predicting clinical success in patients is a major barrier and necessitates early human proof-of-concept studies. Case reports or series have proved useful in some conditions such as GCA, Takayasu arteritis, AOSD and CRS. In the future, trials to assess the efficacy and safety of a specific treatment within a biomarker-positive subgroup in heterogeneous patient populations (for example, a basket trial) to confirm and generate hypotheses might be an option. However, a reliable biomarker for predicting treatment response in many rheumatic diseases has not been identified.

Several questions relating to IL-6 biology remain unanswered. For example, why does IL-6 over-production occur and why does IL-6 signal inhibition lead to clinically meaningful benefits for patients with some diseases associated with IL-6 over-production (such as RA), but not all (such as AS)? Answering these questions would help to further progress our understanding of how various autoimmune diseases are regulated in the context of IL-6 pathway biology and would help in developing additional, personalized treatment options for individual patients or patient subgroups. It seems that the journey of realizing the therapeutic potential of IL-6 pathway inhibition is far from over.