Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Time to Recurrence After Surgical Resection and Survival After Recurrence Among Patients with Perihilar and Distal Cholangiocarcinomas

  • Hepatobiliary Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The differences between perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) regarding recurrence and the factors that affect recurrence after surgery are unclear. This study aims to investigate the differences in recurrence patterns between patients with PHCC and those with DCC after surgical resection with curative intent. It also investigates the risk factors associated with recurrence and survival thereafter.

Patients and Methods

The postoperative courses of 366 patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (EHCCs), including 236 with PHCC and 130 with DCC, who underwent surgical resections were investigated retrospectively.

Results

During follow-up, tumors recurred in 143 (60.6%) patients with PHCC and in 72 (55.4%) patients with DCC. Overall survival (OS) after surgery, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and OS after recurrence were similar for the patients with PHCC and those with DCC. The cumulative probability of recurrence declined 3 years after surgery in the patients with PHCC and those with DCC. A multivariable analysis determined that, among the patients with PHCC and those with DCC, regional lymph node metastasis was a significant risk factor associated with RFS. Ten patients with PHCC and eight patients with DCC with two or fewer sites of recurrence in a single organ underwent resections. A multivariable analysis determined that recurrent tumor resection was an independent prognostic factor associated with OS after recurrence in the patients with PHCC and those with DCC.

Conclusions

Postoperative survival did not differ between the patients with PHCC and those with DCC. Frequent surveillances for recurrence are needed for 3 years after surgical resection of EHCCs. In selected patients, surgery for recurrent EHCCs might be associated with improved outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer staging manual 8th edition. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Komaya K, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Recurrence after curative-intent resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: analysis of a large cohort with a close postoperative follow-up approach. Surgery. 2018;163(4):732–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Groot Koerkamp B, Wiggers JK, Allen PJ, et al. Recurrence rate and pattern of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative intent resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(6):1041–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim YS, Hwang IG, Park SE, et al. Role of adjuvant therapy after R0 resection for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77(5):979–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Komaya K, Ebata T, Shirai K, et al. Recurrence after resection with curative intent for distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2017;104(4):426–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakanishi Y, Tsuchikawa T, Okamura K, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of advanced biliary carcinoma centered in the cystic duct. HPB (Oxford). 2018;20(1):28–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakata J, Wakai T, Matsuda Y, et al. Comparison of number versus ratio of positive lymph nodes in the assessment of lymph node status in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(1):225–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kobayashi A, Miwa S, Nakata T, Miyagawa S. Disease recurrence patterns after R0 resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2010;97(1):56–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Hepatobiliary Cancers Version 4.2019. NCCN. org. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/hepatobiliary.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2019.

  10. Kobayashi S, Konishi M, Kato Y, et al. Surgical outcomes of multicentric adenocarcinomas of the biliary tract. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011;41(9):1079–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shinohara K, Shimoyama Y, Ebata T, et al. Clinicopathologic study on metachronous double cholangiocarcinomas of perihilar and subsequent distal bile duct origin. Surgery. 2017;162(1):84–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(5):663–673.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takahashi Y, Ebata T, Yokoyama Y, et al. Surgery for recurrent biliary tract cancer: a single-center experience with 74 consecutive resections. Ann Surg. 2015;262(1):121–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshitsugu Nakanishi MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest or funding to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakanishi, Y., Okamura, K., Tsuchikawa, T. et al. Time to Recurrence After Surgical Resection and Survival After Recurrence Among Patients with Perihilar and Distal Cholangiocarcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 4171–4180 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08534-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08534-2

Navigation