Abstract
The study examined the factor structure and longitudinal measurement invariance over three time points (1-year apart) of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Self Report (SDQ-SR) for ratings provided by adolescents in Greece. It used exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) to achieve these two goals. At time point one, a total of 968 adolescents (males = 508, and females = 460) between 12 and 17.9 years completed the SDQ-SR. In relation to factor structure, ESEM tested the fit of one- to five-factor models. The findings were interpreted as indicating most support for the ESEM model with three factors (the factors being dysregulation, peer problems, and prosocial behaviour). This model showed support for configural invariance and full metric invariance across the three time points. Except for two thresholds, all other thresholds were also invariant across the three time points. Thus, there was good support for longitudinal measurement invariance. The implications of the findings for use of the SDQ-SR are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R, Ford T (2000). The mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain: HM Stationery Office London.
Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V (2003) The Strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Int Rev Psychiatr 15(1–2):173–7
SDQ: Information for researchers and professionals about the strengths & difficulties questionnaires. n.d., https://www.sdqinfo.com/.
Stone LL, Otten R, Engels RC, Vermulst AA, Janssens JM (2010) Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4-to 12-year-olds: a review. Clin Child Family Psychol Rev 13(3):254–274
Goodman R (2001) Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 40(11):1337–45
Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V (1998) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. Eur Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 7(3):125–30
Goodman R (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 38(5):581–6
Caci H, Morin AJ, Tran A (2015) Investigation of a bifactor model of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatr 24(10):1291–301
Kersten P, Czuba K, McPherson K, Dudley M, Elder H, Tauroa R et al (2016) A systematic review of evidence for the psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Int J Behav Dev 40(1):64–75
DeVries JM, Gebhardt M, Voß S (2017) An assessment of measurement invariance in the 3-and 5-factor models of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: new insights from a longitudinal study. Personal Individ Differ 119:1–6
Goodman A, Lamping DL, Ploubidis GB (2010) When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 38(8):1179–91
Van Roy B, Veenstra M, Clench-Aas J (2008) Construct validity of the five-factor strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early, and late adolescence. J Child Psychol Psychiat 49(12):1304–12
Di Riso D, Salcuni S, Chessa D, Raudino A, Lis A, Altoè G (2010) The Strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). Early evidence of its reliability and validity in a community sample of Italian children. Personal Individ Differ 49(6):570–575
Richter J, Sagatun Å, Heyerdahl S, Oppedal B, Røysamb E (2011) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ)–self-report. An analysis of its structure in a multiethnic urban adolescent sample. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 52(9):1002–1011
Essau CA, Olaya B, Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous X, Pauli G, Gilvarry C, Bray D et al (2012) Psychometric properties of the strength and difficulties questionnaire from five European countries. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 21(3):232–45
Rønning JA, Handegaard BH, Sourander A, Mørch W-T (2004) The Strengths and difficulties self-report questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples. Eur Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 13(2):73–82
Mellor D, Stokes M (2007) The factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Eur J Psychol Assess 23(2):105–12
Percy A, McCrystal P, Higgins K (2008) Confirmatory factor analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Eur J Psychol Assess 24(1):43–8
Goodman A, Goodman R (2011) Population mean scores predict child mental disorder rates: validating SDQ prevalence estimators in Britain. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 52(1):100–108
van de Looij-Jansen PM, Goedhart AW, de Wilde EJ, Treffers PD (2011) Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire: how important are method effects and minor factors? Br J Clin Psychol 50(2):127–44
Giannakopoulos G, Tzavara C, Dimitrakaki C, Kolaitis G, Rotsika V, Tountas Y (2009) The factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in Greek adolescents. Ann Gener Psychiatr 8(1):20
Yao S, Zhang C, Zhu X, Jing X, McWhinnie CM, Abela JR (2009) Measuring adolescent psychopathology: psychometric properties of the self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a sample of Chinese adolescents. J Adolesc Health 45(1):55–62
Ruchkin V, Koposov R, Vermeiren R, Schwab-Stone M (2012) The strength and difficulties questionnaire: russian validation of the teacher version and comparison of teacher and student reports. J Adolesc 35(1):87–96
Poulou MS (2013) Emotionality and social behaviour. Hellenic J Psychol 10:47–60
Bibou-Nakou I, Markos A, Padeliadu S, Chatzilampou P, Ververidou S (2019) Multi-informant evaluation of students' psychosocial status through SDQ in a national Greek sample. Child Youth Ser Rev 96:47–54
Liang L, Yang J, Yao S (2019) Measurement equivalence of the SDQ in chinese adolescents: a horizontal and longitudinal perspective. J Affect Disord 257:439–44
Twyford JM, Buckley L, Moffa K, Dowdy E (2019) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) self-report: factor structure of the self-report form in Latinx youth. Int J Sch Educat Psychol 7(3):187–200
Brown TA. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research: Guilford Publications.
Morin AJ, Arens AK, Marsh HW (2016) A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Struct Equat model: Multidiscip J 23(1):116–39
Dickey WC, Blumberg SJ (2004) Revisiting the factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: United States, 2001. J Am Acad Child & Adolesc Psychiatr 43(9):1159–67
Stokes M, Mellor D, Yeow J, Hapidzal NF (2014) Do parents, teachers and children use the SDQ in a similar fashion? Qual Quant 48(2):983–1000
Marsh HW, Wen Z, Hau K-T, Little TD, Bovaird JA, Widaman KF (2007) Unconstrained structural equation models of latent interactions: contrasting residual-and mean-centered approaches. Struct Equat Model: Multidiscip J 14(4):570–80
Marsh HW, Lüdtke O, Robitzsch A, Trautwein U, Asparouhov T, Muthén B et al (2009) Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivar Behav Res 44(6):764–802
Asparouhov T, Muthén B (2009) Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structur Equat Model: Multidiscip J 16(3):397–438
Marsh HW, Morin AJ, Parker PD, Kaur G (2014) Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Ann Rev Clin Psychol 10:85–110
Hall CL, Guo B, Valentine AZ, Groom MJ, Daley D, Sayal K et al (2019) The validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms. PloS One 14(6):e0218518
Drasgow F, Kanfer R (1985) Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. J Appl Psychol 70(4):662
Leopold DR, Christopher ME, Burns GL, Becker SP, Olson RK, Willcutt EG (2016) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and sluggish cognitive tempo throughout childhood: temporal invariance and stability from preschool through ninth grade. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 57(9):1066–74
Cole DA, Martin JM, Jacquez FM, Tram JM, Zelkowitz R, Nick EA et al (2017) Time-varying and time-invariant dimensions of depression in children and adolescents: implications for cross-informant agreement. J Abnor Psychol 126(5):635
Motti-Stefanidi F, Pavlopoulos V, Tantaros S (2011) Parent-adolescent conflict and adolescents' adaptation: a longitudinal study of Albanian immigrant youth living in Greece. IOS Press 5(1–2):57–71
Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL (2005) Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Int J Test 5(2):159–68
Bullinger M, Anderson R, Cella D, Aaronson N (1993) Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Qual Res 2(6):451–9
Muthén L, Muthén B (2012) Mplus statistical modeling software: Release 7.0. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén
Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard PÉ, Savalei V (2012) When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods 17(3):354
Lubke GH, Muthén BO (2004) Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structr Equat Model 11(4):514–34
Beauducel A, Herzberg PY (2006) On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structur Equat Model 13(2):186–203
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics Boston. MA: Allyn and Bacon 5: 2007
Costello AB, Best Osborne J (2005) Practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Evaluat 10:1–9
Guo B, Kaylor-Hughes C, Garland A, Nixon N, Sweeney T, Simpson S et al (2017) Factor structure and longitudinal measurement invariance of PHQ-9 for specialist mental health care patients with persistent major depressive disorder: exploratory structural equation modelling. J Affect Disord 219:1–8
Meredith W (1993) Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58(4):525–43
Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods 3(1):4–70
Hu L-t, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3(4):424
Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structur Equat Model 9(2):233–55
Chen FF (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structur Equat Model: Multidiscip J 14(3):464–504
Deutz MH, Shi Q, Vossen HG, Huijding J, Prinzie P, Deković M et al (2018) Evaluation of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire-dysregulation profile (SDQ-DP). Psychol Assess 30(9):1174
Holtmann M, Becker A, Banaschewski T, Rothenberger A, Roessner V (2011) Psychometric validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire-dysregulation profile. Psychopathology 44(1):53–9
Kunze B, Wang B, Isensee C, Schlack R, Ravens-Sieberer U, Klasen F et al (2018) Gender associated developmental trajectories of SDQ-dysregulation profile and its predictors in children. Psychol Med 48(3):404–15
Cheung GW (2008) Testing equivalence in the structure, means, and variances of higher-order constructs with structural equation modeling. Organ Res Methods 11(3):593–613
Gomez R, Stavropoulos V (2019) Oppositional Defiant disorder dimensions: associations with traits of the multidimensional personality model among adults. Psychiatr Q
West SG, Taylor AB, Wu W (2012) Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. Handbook Structur Equat Model 1:209–31
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gomez, R., Motti-Stefanidi, F., Jordan, S. et al. Greek Validation of the Factor Structure and Longitudinal Measurement Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Self Report (SDQ-SR): Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 52, 880–890 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-01065-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-01065-7