Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative cradle to grave environmental life cycle assessment of traditional and extensive vegetative roofs: an application for the Lebanese context

  • BUILDING COMPONENTS AND BUILDINGS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Vegetative roofs (VRs) are fully planted roof spaces that offer aesthetic view, storm water management, sound insulation, energy savings, and air improvement. The aim on this work is to compare the life cycle environmental impacts of traditional gravel ballasted roof (TGBR) and extensive green roof (EGR) each having a surface area of 650 m2.

Methods

Environmental impacts were determined and analyzed using a cradle to grave life cycle assessment (LCA) including two end-of-life scenarios (landfilling and recycling). In particular, for the use phase, the updated Lebanese electricity grid was integrated for the first time in the LCA software SimaPro and real-time temperature monitoring for TGBR and EGR roof mockups that were installed on the rooftop of the Chemical Engineering Building at the University of Balamand-Lebanon were used. Life cycle impact assessment was performed using the IMPACT 2002+ methodology for all impact categories except for water scarcity, which was determined from the water use in life cycle assessment (WULCA) consensus model.

Results and discussion

Results demonstrated that the assembly and the use phase were the highest contributors to the environmental impacts for TGBR and EGR. Comparing the two types of roofs, TGBR had the highest contribution for all impact categories except for “land occupation.” This is justified by the presence of the vegetation layer in the vegetative roofs.

Conclusions

EGRs are more efficient than TGBR from an environmental perspective. Moreover, increasing the share of renewable energy in the total Lebanese energy production will lower greenhouse gases emissions from the energy sector and the other life cycle environmental impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Region and the European Union support, the programme “CPER BATIMENT DURABLE. Axis 2 MADUR Project: High-performance building materials with low environmental impact, sustainable and resilient” within the framework of the “Operational Program FEDER/FSE 2014-2020”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Koura.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Alexander Passer

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koura, J., Manneh, R., Belarbi, R. et al. Comparative cradle to grave environmental life cycle assessment of traditional and extensive vegetative roofs: an application for the Lebanese context. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25, 423–442 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01700-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01700-z

Keywords

Navigation