Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainability-based optimization algorithm

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Project decisions are currently decided primarily on initial costs and neglect environmental and social aspects. In this study, a new optimization algorithm has been developed based on the three-legged stool of sustainability, namely technical, environmental, and socioeconomic aspects. The new algorithm, entitled the sustainability-based optimization algorithm, will minimize the average of normalized values of life-cycle costs, environmental impacts, and social objections subject to the constraint that all options will be acceptable. The optimal combinations of input variable values are found by optimization. The algorithm is demonstrated on algal biofuel production and is adapted from the model described in the greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation model. The indicators that are practical and widely applicable in algal production were based on previous studies. The results show the minimum objective function occurs at the combination of input variables that minimizes each component of sustainability, namely CO2-reduction, environmental, and economic aspects. The minimum objective considering only the social aspects occurs at the water-recycling reduction scenario. Considering the optimal solution with the focus only on one of the environmental, social, or economic terms could potentially lead to a solution that is not robust. The advantage of this algorithm is that by considering all active and effective indicators together the most sustainably robust result is found. The new algorithm is potentially applicable for various types of projects involved in resilient infrastructure such as bridges, roads, electrical grids, water distribution systems, sewer systems, water and wastewater treatment plants, and renewable energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abduli MA, Tavakolli H, Azari A (2013) Alternatives for solid waste management in Isfahan, Iran: a case study. Waste Manage Res 31(5):532–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Alibaba (2018) Alumina catalyst support. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/3mm-50mm-AL2O3-Alumina-Catalyst-Support_60788938860.html?spm=a2700.7724857.normalList.2.24cf3ac2VE8fyw&s=p. Accessed 18 Oct 2018

  • Ashrafi K, Motlagh MS-P, Tavakolli H (2013) Analysis of dispersion of particulate matter (PM) emitted from a steel complex affecting its surrounding urban area. Sect 3 Case Stud Spec Urban Areas Underst Roles Key Econ Geogr Urban Des Inputs Pollut Charact Mitig Scenar 87:40

    Google Scholar 

  • Azari A, Noorpoor A, Bozorg-Haddad O (2018) Carbon footprint analyses of microalgae cultivation systems under autotrophic and heterotrophic conditions. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2072-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bello M, Ranganathan P, Brennan F (2017) Life cycle optimization for sustainable algal biofuel production using integrated nutrient recycling technology. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:9869–9880

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BETO DOE Bioenergy Technologies Office (2015) 2015 Project peer review, microalgae analysis. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Washington, D.C. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/04/f21/algae_wigmosta_131102.pdf. Accessed Sept 2019

  • Bhattu B, Barkdoll BD, Breffle WS (2018) A sustainability-based socio-technical-environmental project selection algorithm. Sustain Water Resour Manag 4:117–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer WJ (2013) Induction of microalgal lipids for biodiesel production in tandem with sequestration of high carbon dioxide concentration. Michigan Technological University, Houghton

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter NA (2012) Environmental and economic assessment of microalgae-derived jet fuel. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25:294–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarens AF, Resurreccion EP, White MA, Colosi LM (2010) Environmental life cycle comparison of algae to other bioenergy feedstocks. Environ Sci Technol 44:1813–1819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collet P, Hélias A, Lardon L, Ras M, Goy RA, Steyer JP (2011) Life-cycle assessment of microalgae culture coupled to biogas production. Biores Technol 102(1):207–214

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Congress US (2007) Energy independence and security act of 2007 Public law 2:110–140

  • Cronshaw I, Grafton Q (2014) Reflections on energy security in the Asia Pacific. Asia Pac Policy Stud 1:127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH et al (2013) Indicators for assessing socioeconomic sustainability of bioenergy systems: a short list of practical measures. Ecol Ind 26:87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis WJ (2009) Overcoming competitive disadvantage: future commercial viability of microalgae based biodiesel. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis R, Fishman D, Frank ED, Wigmosta MS, Aden A, Coleman AM et al (2012) Renewable diesel from algal lipids: an integrated baseline for cost, emissions, and resource potential from a harmonized model (No. ANL/ESD/12-4; PNNL-21437; NREL/TP-5100-55431). National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis RE, Markham JN, Kinchin CM, Canter C, Han J, Li Q et al (2018) 2017 Algae harmonization study: evaluating the potential for future algal biofuel costs, sustainability, and resource assessment from harmonized modeling (No. NREL/TP-5100-70715). National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewulf J, Langenhove HV (2006) Renewables-based technology: sustainability assessment. Wiley renewable resources series. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling J (2013) Improving energy security with the great green fleet: the case for transitioning from ethanol to drop-in renewable fuels. J Energy Environ Law 2013:82–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Efroymson RA, Dale VH (2015) Environmental indicators for sustainable production of algal biofuels. Ecol Indic 49:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efroymson RA, Dale VH, Langholtz MH (2016) Socioeconomic indicators for sustainable design and commercial development of algal biofuel systems. GCB Bioenergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2018) Electric power monthly. U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_5_6_a. Accessed 21 Nov 2018

  • Energy A (2016) Energy Price Fact Sheet. Red 13(18):6

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (1999) Compendium method TO-15—determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in air collected in specially-prepared canisters and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air

  • Frank ED, Han J, Palou-Rivera I, Elgowainy A, Wang MQ (2012) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions affect the life-cycle analysis of algal biofuels. Environ Res Lett 7:014030

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulbright NR (2018) Tax equity and carbon sequestration credits. https://projectfinance.law/publications/2018/april/tax-equity-and-carbon-sequestration-credits. Accessed 1 Jan 2019

  • Ghimire SR, John JM (2017) A modified eco-efficiency framework and methodology for advancing the state of practice of sustainability analysis as applied to green infrastructure. Integr Environ Assess Manag 13:821–831

    Google Scholar 

  • GREET (2019) The greenhouse gases, regulated emissions, and energy use in transportation model. Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler RM, Canter CE, Kalnes TN, Lupton FS, Kholiqov O, Shonnard DR, Blowers P (2012) Evaluation of environmental impacts from microalgae cultivation in open-air raceway ponds: analysis of the prior literature and investigation of wide variance in predicted impacts. Algal Res 1:83–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero M, Cifuentes A, Ibañez E (2006) Sub- and supercritical fluid extraction of functional ingredients from different natural sources: plants, food-by-products, algae and microalgae: a review. Food Chem 98:136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kemcore (2018) Sulphuric acid 98%. https://www.kemcore.com/sulphuric-acid-98.html. Accessed 4 Oct 2018

  • Lardon L, Helias A, Sialve B, Stayer JP, Bernard O (2009) Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. Environ Sci Technol 43:6475–6481

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen M, Murray SA (2003) The ecological footprint—issues and trends. The University of Sydney, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Horsman M, Wu N, Lan C, Dubois-Calero N (2008) Biofuels from microalgae. Biotechnol Prog 24:815–820

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mata TM, Martins AA, Caetano NS (2010) Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:217–232

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MSU Extension (2017) Fertilizer price trends in 2017. https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/fertilizer_price_trends_in_2017. Accessed 8 Dec 2018

  • Murray BC, Cropper ML, de la Chesnaye FC, Reilly JM (2014) How effective are US renewable energy subsidies in cutting greenhouse gases? Am Econ Rev 104:569–574

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2012) Sustainable development of algal biofuels in the United States. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. https://doi.org/10.17226/13437

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olivares JA, Baxter I, Brown J, Carleton M, Cattolico RA, Taraka D et al (2014) National alliance for advanced biofuels and bio-products final technical report (No. DOE-DANF-03046). Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfield ND, Levine RB, Keoleian GA, Miller SA, Savage PE (2015) Growing algae for biodiesel on direct sunlight or sugars: a comparative life cycle assessment. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:386–395. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc5004117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsa M, Jalilzadeh H, Pazoki M, Ghasemzadeh R, Abduli M (2018) Hydrothermal liquefaction of Gracilaria gracilis and Cladophora glomerata macro-algae for biocrude production. Bioresour Technol 250:26–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passell H, Dhaliwal H, Reno M, Wu B, Amotz AB, Ivry E, Gay M, Czartoski T, Laurin L, Ayer N (2013) Algae biodiesel life cycle assessment using current commercial data. J Environ Manage 129:103–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pazoki M, Dalaei P (2017) The assessment of waste source-separated system in Tehran and comparative analysis between collection systems by RIAM method. Int J Environ Waste Manag 19:233–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazoki M, Hasanidarabadi B (2017) Management of toxic and hazardous contents of oil sludge in Siri Island. Glob J Environ Sci Manag 3:33–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pehnt M (2006) Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies. Renew Energy 31:55–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander K, Ganti SM (2010) Life cycle analysis of algae biodiesel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(7):704–714

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sathish A (2012) Biodiesel production from mixed culture algae via a wet lipid extraction procedure. Utah State university, Logan

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlagermann P, Göttlicher G, Dillschneider R, Rosello-Sastre R, Posten C (2012) Composition of algal oil and its potential as biofuel. J Combust 2012:285185. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/285185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sedjo RA (2013) Comparative life cycle assessments: carbon neutrality and wood biomass energy. Resour Future DP 13–11. Retrieved from: http://www.ourenergypolicy.org/wp

  • Sheehan J, Dunahay T, Benemann J, Roessler P (1998) A look back at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Aquatic Species Program: biodiesel from algae. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S. Department of Energy), Golden

    Google Scholar 

  • Shunmugaraj P Mathematics I, MTH 101A. IITK. http://home.iitk.ac.in/~psraj/mth101/index.html. Accessed 28 Nov 2018

  • Stephenson AL, Kazamia E, Dennis JS, Howe CJ, Scott SA, Smith AG (2010) Life-cycle assessment of potential algal biodiesel production in the United Kingdom: a comparison of raceways and air-lift tubular bioreactors. Energy Fuels 24:4062–4077

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tatum C (2012) Using the greet model to analyze algae as a feedstock for biodiesel production. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli H, Azari A, Ashrafi K, Salimian M, Momeni M (2019) Human health risk assessment of arsenic downstream of a steel plant in Isfahan, Iran: a case study. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02429-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakolli H, Azari A, Ashrafi K, Pour MS (2013) Cementitious properties of steelmaking slags. Tech J Eng Appl Sci 3:1071–1073

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornley P, Rogers J, Huang Y (2008) Quantification of employment from biomass power plants. Renew Energy 33:1922–1927

    Google Scholar 

  • Treasury HM (2004) DTI (Department of Trade and Industry). Balancing work and family life: enhancing choice and support for parents

  • UN (2007) Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies, 3rd edn. UN, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2017) Land values. USDA, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visschers VH, Keller C, Siegrist M (2011) Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: investigating an explanatory model. Energy Policy 39:3621–3629

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Li Y, Wu N, Lan C (2008) CO2 bio-mitigation using microalgae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:707–718

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wigmosta MS, Coleman AM, Skaggs RJ, Huesemann MH, Lane LJ (2011) National microalgae biofuel production potential and resource demand. Water Resour Res 47:W00H04

    Google Scholar 

  • Winjobi O, Tavakoli H, Klemetsrud BJ, Handler RM, Marker T, Roberts M, Shonnard DR (2018) Carbon footprint analysis of gasoline and diesel from forest residues and algae using integrated hydropyrolysis and hydroconversion plus Fischer-Tropsch (IH2® Plus cool GTL™). ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:10766

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woertz IC, Benemann JR, Du N, Unnasch S, Mendola DB, Mitchell BG, Lundquist TJ (2014) Life cycle GHG emissions from microalgal biodiesel—a CA-GREET model. Environ Sci Technol 48(11):6060–6068

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • You F, Tao L, Graziano DJ, Snyder SW (2012) Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input–output analysis. AlChE J 58:1157–1180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yue D, Pandya S, You F (2016) Integrating hybrid life cycle assessment with multiobjective optimization: a modeling framework. Environ Sci Technol 50:1501–1509

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu L, Huo S, Qin L (2015) A microalgae-based biodiesel refinery: sustainability concerns and challenges. Int J Green Energy 12:595–602

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The completion of this undertaking could not have been possible without the support of Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan Technological University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Dr., Houghton, MI, 49931, USA

    H. Tavakoli & B. D. Barkdoll

Authors
  1. H. Tavakoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. D. Barkdoll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Tavakoli.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: M. Abbaspour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tavakoli, H., Barkdoll, B.D. Sustainability-based optimization algorithm. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 1537–1550 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02535-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02535-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation