Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Radiation Oncology Online: Quality, Strategies, and Disparities

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although much is known about the quality of online health information (OHI) for many malignancies, the availability of high-quality OHI for oncologic treatments remains undefined. Furthermore, search strategies that improve quality of radiation oncology OHI, and disparities in availability of high-quality OHI, are not well-described. Forty phrases describing malignancies and their treatment modalities (radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery), and 57 phrases describing radiation oncology treatments, including abbreviations for some treatments and translations in different languages, were generated. The Health on the Net Foundation framework for assessing OHI quality was applied to the top 100 websites listed for each search phrase. The availability of high-quality OHI between malignancies and treatment modalities, and among treatment modalities, was compared. The roles of radiation oncology term abbreviation, search result order, patient gender, and language, on availability of high-quality OHI, were also assessed. Among the first 10, 20, and 50 websites for each search phrase, there were significantly more high-quality websites for phrases describing malignancies compared with respective treatment modalities (P < 0.02 for all). There were no differences among treatment modalities. Among radiation oncology treatment phrases, there were no significant differences between searches for full-name phrases and their respective abbreviations, though earlier results were more likely to be of high quality. Gender did not affect quality of OHI, though language did. Availability of high-quality OHI for cancer treatments lags behind that of cancer OHI. For radiation oncology treatment OHI, search strategies and patient disparities highlight potential areas for provider intervention and increased quality of OHI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (2019) Internet live stats. http://www.internetlivestats.com/. Accessed 2 Feb 2019

  2. Fox S (2011) The social life of health information. In: Pew Res. Cent. http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/05/12/the-social-life-of-health-information-2011/. Accessed 3 Mar 2019

  3. Tan SS-L, Goonawardene N (2017) Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 19:e9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5729

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Storino A, Castillo-angeles M, Watkins AA et al (2016) Assessing the accuracy and readability of online health information for patients with pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg 151:831–837. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Couper MP, Singer E, Levin CA, Fowler FJ Jr, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ (2010) Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Mak 30:106S–114S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10377661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pai H, Lau F (2005) Web-based electronic health information systems for prostate cancer patients. Can J Urol 12:2700–2709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jabbour J, Milross C, Sundaresan P, Ebrahimi A, Shepherd HL, Dhillon HM, Morgan G, Ashford B, Abdul-Razak M, Wong E, Veness M, Palme CE, Froggatt C, Cohen R, Ekmejian R, Tay J, Roshan D, Clark JR (2017) Education and support needs in patients with head and neck cancer: a multi-institutional survey. Cancer 123:1949–1957. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ybarra ML, Suman M (2006) Help seeking behavior and the Internet: a national survey. Int J Med Inform 75:29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Varady NH, Dee EC, Katz JN (2018) International assessment on quality and content of Internet information on osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 26:1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2018.04.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davaris M, Barnett S, Abouassaly R, Lawrentschuk N (2017) Thoracic surgery information on the Internet: a multilingual quality assessment. Interact J Med Res 6:e5. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.6732

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Saraswat I, Abouassaly R, Dwyer P, Bolton DM, Lawrentschuk N (2016) Female urinary incontinence health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 27:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2742-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dee EC, Varady NH, Katz JN, Buchmiller TL (2019) Disparity in online health information in pediatric vs. adult surgical conditions. Pediatr Surg Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-019-04451-y

  13. Lawrentschuk N, Sasges D, Tasevski R, Abouassaly R, Scott AM, Davis ID (2012) Oncology health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation. Ann Surg Oncol 19:706–713. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2137-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Menon D, Chelakkot PG, Sunil D, Lakshmaiah A (2017) A cross sectional review of patient information available in the world wide web on CyberKnife : fallacies and pitfalls. Support Care Cancer 25:3769–3773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3807-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schomas DA, Milano MT, Roeske JC, Mell LK, Mundt AJ (2004) Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and the Internet: evaluation of the content and quality of patient-oriented information. Cancer 101:412–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Janssen S, Meyer A, Vordermark D, Steinmann D (2010) Radiation therapy and Internet – what can patients expect? Homepage analysis of German radiotherapy institutions. Strahlenther Onkol 186:700–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Risk A, Dzenowagis J (2001) Review of Internet health information quality initiatives. J Med Internet Res 3:E28. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.4.e28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. (2014) Health on the net foundation. https://www.hon.ch/en/. Accessed 2 Mar 2019

  19. Hanna K, Brennan D, Sambrook P, Armfield J (2015) Third molars on the Internet: a guide for assessing information quality and readability. Interact J Med Res 4:1–12. https://doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.4712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawrentschuk N, Abouassaly R, Hackett N, Groll R, Fleshner NE (2009) Health information quality on the Internet in urological oncology: a multilingual longitudinal evaluation. Urology 74:1058–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Adorisio O, Silveri M, Rivosecchi M, Tozzi A, Scottoni F, Buonuomo P (2012) Analysis of readability and quality of web pages addressing both common and uncommon topics in pediatric surgery. Eur J Pediatr Surg 22:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1308704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen EC, Manecksha RP, Abouassaly R, Bolton DM, Reich O, Lawrentschuk N (2014) A multilingual evaluation of current health information on the internet for the treatments of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate Int 2:161–168. https://doi.org/10.12954/PI.14058

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaudinat A, Grabar N, Boyer C (2007) Machine learning approach for automatic quality criteria detection of health web pages. Stud Health Technol Inform 129:705–709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang DTS, Abouassaly R, Lawrentschuk N (2018) Quality of health information on the Internet for prostate cancer. Adv Urol 2018:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6705152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Basch EM, Thaler HT, Shi W, Yakren S, Schrag D (2004) Use of information resources by patients with cancer and their companions. Cancer 100:2476–2483. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Morahan-Martin JM (2004) How Internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review. CyberPsychol Behav 7:497–510. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2004.7.497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Curtis LM, Wolf MS, Weiss KB, Grammer LC (2012) The impact of health literacy and socioeconomic status on asthma disparities. J Asthma 49:178–183. https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2011.648297

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Osborn CY, Paasche-Orlow MK, Davis TC, Wolf MS (2007) Health literacy. An overlooked factor in understanding HIV health disparities. Am J Prev Med 33:374–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Flores G (2006) Language barriers to health care in the United States. N Engl J Med 355:229–231. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp058316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Semere W, Karamanoukian HL, Levitt M, Edwards T, Murero M, D'Ancona G, Donias HW, Glick PL (2003) A pediatric surgery study: parent usage of the Internet for medical information. J Pediatr Surg 38:560–564. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2003.50122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Boston MM, Ruwe E, Duggins A, Willging P (2005) Internet use by parents of children undergoing outpatient otolaryngology procedures. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:719–722. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.8.719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Khoo K, Bolt P, Babl FE, Jury S, Goldman RD (2008) Health information seeking by parents in the Internet age. J Paediatr Child Health 44:419–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01322.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Starman JS, Gettys FK, Capo JA, Fleischli JE, Norton HJ, Karunakar MA (2010) Quality and content of Internet-based information for ten common orthopaedic sports medicine diagnoses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1612–1618. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pollock K, Cox K, Howard P, Wilson E, Moghaddam N (2008) Service user experiences of information delivery after a diagnosis of cancer: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 16:963–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0363-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Marie Gabrielle Dee for her assistance with proofreading the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Edward Christopher Dee & Nathan H. Varady

Authors
  1. Edward Christopher Dee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathan H. Varady
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Christopher Dee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dee, E.C., Varady, N.H. Radiation Oncology Online: Quality, Strategies, and Disparities. J Canc Educ 35, 988–996 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01553-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01553-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation