Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How Public R&D Support Affects Research Activity of Enterprises: Evidence from the Czech Republic

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Public support for research and development (R&D) in business sector is usually justified by the argument about market failure. New knowledge produced by research and development has some features of public good, which causes underinvestment in private R&D activities. From the social development point of view, it is desirable to produce and diffuse new knowledge. The article seeks to answer the question what impact a change in the amount of public support for R&D has on research activities of private enterprises. This paper tries to bridge a gap in the literature dealing with impact of R&D policy in emerging innovation systems in Central Europe. Our research is carried out on the example of the Czech Republic and its regions. We evaluate direct and indirect R&D support in the period 2007–2015, and we pay attention to three variables representing R&D in businesses: business expenditures on R&D, number of R&D employees in businesses and number of R&D workplaces in businesses. We calculate year-on-year changes in all the observed variables, and the relation between the public support and research activities of enterprises is assessed through descriptive statistics, measures of association and regression models. Our analyses proved a positive impact of R&D support on companies’ own expenditures on R&D and the number of employees. The relation between R&D support and number of workplaces seems to be quite weak. The paper also discusses limitations of the research and implications for public policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerts, K., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: a comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research Policy, 37(5), 806–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afcha, S., & García-Quevedo, J. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition. Industrial & Corporate Change, 25(6), 955–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agostini, M. R., Vieira, L. M., Da Rosa Portella Tondolo, R., & Gonçalves Tondolo, V. A. (2017). An overview on social innovation research: guiding future studies. Brazilian Business Review (Portuguese Edition), 14(4), 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali-Yrkkö, J. (2005). Impact of public R&D financing on employment. ETLA Discussion Papers, No. 980.

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocations of resources of invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, S., & Bolli, T. (2013). A comparison of national and international innovation cooperation in five European countries. Review of Industrial Organization, 43(3), 163–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. (1998). Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies, 6(2), 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barge-Gil, A., & López, A. (2014). R versus D: estimating the differentiated effect of research and development on innovation results. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(1), 93–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M., Lopes-Bento, C., & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2016). Radical or incremental: where does R&D policy hit? Research Policy, 45(4), 869–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berube, C., & Mohnen, P. (2009). Are firms that receive r&d subsidies more innovative? Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(1), 206–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 442–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Martinsson, G., & Petersen, B. C. (2017). What promotes R&D? Comparative evidence from around the world. Research Policy, 46(2), 447–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busom, I., Corchuelo, B., & Martinez-Ros, E. (2014). Tax incentives … or subsidies for business R&D? Small Business Economics, 43(3), 571–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., & Lee, J. (2017). Repairing the R&D market failure: public R&D subsidy and the composition of private R&D. Research Policy, 46(8), 1465–1478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, G., Giuliodori, D., Giuliodori, R., & Rodriguez, A. (2016). The effectiveness of tax incentives for R&D+i in developing countries: the case of Argentina. Research Policy, 45(10), 2023–2035.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSO. (2016). Výzkum a vývoj v krajích 2005–2015. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/statistika_vyzkumu_a_vyvoje. Accessed 10 Sept 2017.

  • CSO. (2017). Nepřímá veřejná podpora výzkumu a vývoje v České republice 2015. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/neprima-verejna-podpora-vyzkumu-a-vyvoje-v-ceske-republice. Accessed 10 Sept 2017.

  • Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., & Rosa, J. M. (2011). Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: a microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy, 40(2), 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4), 497–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M. (2017). Innovation in firms. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dortet-Bernadet, V., & Sicsic, M. (2017). The effect of R&D subsidies and tax incentives on employment an evaluation for small firms in France. Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, 2017(493), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles. London: Routledge Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elschner, C., Ernst, C., Licht, G., & Spengel, C. (2011). What the design of an R&D tax incentive tells about its effectiveness: a simulation of R&D tax incentives in the European Union. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010). Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm. Accessed 20 August 2016.

  • European Commission (2018). European Innovation Scoreboard. http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en. Accessed 4 July 2018.

  • Faggian, A., & McCann, P. (2009). Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British regions. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(2), 317–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. M., Scherngell, T., & Jansenberger, E. (2009). Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers: evidence from high-tech patent citations in Europe. Annals of Regional Science, 43(4), 839–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gál, Z. (2014). Policy aspects of innovation governance. Central and regional governance of innovation in Hungary. Társadalomkutatás, 32(3), 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershman, M., & Kitova, G. (2017). Assessing government support for research and innovation in Russian universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(3), 1067–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, X., & Pazó, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Research Policy, 37(3), 371–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlaváček, P., & Sivíček, T. (2017). Spatial differences in innovation potential of central European regions during posttransformation period. Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hud, M., & Hussinger, K. (2015). The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis. Research Policy, 44(10), 1844–1855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudec, O., & Prochádzková, M. (2015). Visegrad countries and regions: innovation performance and efficiency. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 19(2), 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huergo, E., & Moreno, L. (2017). Subsidies or loans? Evaluating the impact of R&D support programmes. Research Policy, 46(7), 1198–1214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, A. (2001). Building regional innovation systems: is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy? Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24(1), 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janeček, M., Mráček, K., & Neumajer, V. (2012). Nepřímá podpora výzkumu, vývoje a inovací. Podklad pro přípravu nové NP VaVaI. Prague: Aktivity pro výzkumné organizace, o.p.s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klette, T. J., Møen, J., & Griliches, Z. (2000). Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies. Research Policy, 29(4), 471–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klímová, V., & Žítek, V. (2012). Selected aspects of the innovation environment in the south Moravian and the Moravian-Silesian regions. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on European Integration (pp. 117–130). Ostrava: VŠB-TUO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klímová, V., & Žítek, V. (2017). Intensity and structure of research and development in the Czech and Slovak regions. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 15(1), 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraftová, I., & Miháliková, E. (2011). Rozsah a dopady podpory výzkumu a inovací v zemích bývalého Československa. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, XVI(22), 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 187–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montmartin, B. A., & Herrera, M. (2015). Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives: empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models. Research Policy, 44(5), 1065–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mynarzová, M., & Štverková, H. (2015). Public support as an important factor for competitiveness of SMEs in the European Union. In Conference on Current Problems of the Corporate Sector (pp. 452–461). Bratislava: University of Economics in Bratislava.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2005). Oslo manual. The measurement of scientific and technological activities, proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Frascati manual. Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). Measuring tax support for R&D and innovation. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/science/rd-tax-stats.htm. Accessed 16 August 2017.

  • Potts, J., & Kastelle, T. (2010). Public sector innovation research: what’s next? Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12(2), 122–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, V., & Stejskal, J. (2017). Different approaches to managing innovation activities: an analysis of strong, moderate, and modest innovators. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 28(1), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiavone, F., & A Simoni, M. (2016). Prior experience and co-opetition in R&D programs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(3), 819–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business cycles: a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: McGraw-Hill book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soukopová, J., Vaceková, G., & Klimovský, D. (2017). Local waste management in the Czech Republic: limits and merits of public-private partnership and contracting out. Utilities Policy, 2017(48), 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R., & Jensen, P. (2013). The effects of government subsidies on business r&d employment: evidence from OECD countries. National Tax Journal, 66(2), 281–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ženka, J., Slach, O., Novotný, J., & Ivan, I. (2017). Spatial distribution of knowledge-intensive business services in a small post-communist economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(2), 385–406.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Regional Economics and Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Lipová 41a, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic

    Viktorie Klímová & Vladimír Žítek

  2. Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Lipová 41a, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic

    Maria Králová

Authors
  1. Viktorie Klímová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vladimír Žítek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Králová
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktorie Klímová.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klímová, V., Žítek, V. & Králová, M. How Public R&D Support Affects Research Activity of Enterprises: Evidence from the Czech Republic. J Knowl Econ 11, 888–907 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-0580-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-019-0580-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation