Skip to main content

Conditions of Care and Episode Groups

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality Spine Care

Abstract

Bundled payment or episode-based payment models are part of an effort to curb healthcare costs in the USA by combining all care-related costs into a single payment to be distributed among the hospital or facility, the treating physician or provider, post-acute care, and subsequent care including readmissions or complications. Episode groups aggregate all of the items and services involved in care for a particular patient cohort so that the total cost of the care can be assessed. Episodes are made of three consecutive steps defining an episode using a combination of logic rules and medical billing codes specific to each episode. These steps are (a) opening, (b) grouping, and (c) closing. After obtaining observed cost to expected cost ratios for the episode, risk adjustment is employed to determine the final cost for a single episode. While bundled payment models have demonstrated cost savings in several other surgical fields such as cardiac surgery, total joint arthroplasty, and colectomy, current evidence in spine surgery is insufficient to speak for its favorable effects. It is imperative that hospitals and physicians comply with the efforts to curb healthcare costs in spine surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. NHE-Fact-Sheet. 2017.; Available: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NHE-Fact-Sheet.html

  2. Davis K, Stremikis K, Schoen C, Squires D. Mirror, mirror on the wall, 2014 update: how the US health care system compares internationally. The Commonwealth Fund. 2014;16:1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Squires DA. The U.S. health system in perspective: a comparison of twelve industrialized nations. Issue Brief. 2011;16:1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative: General Information | Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation [Internet]. [cited 9 Feb 2018]. Available: https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/bundled-payments/

  5. Protection P, Act AC. Patient protection and affordable care act. Public Law. 2010;111:759–62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McIlvennan CK, Eapen ZJ, Allen LA. Hospital readmissions reduction program. Circulation. 2015;131:1796–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1418–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang W, Watanabe-Galloway S. Ten-year secular trends for congestive heart failure hospitalizations: an analysis of regional differences in the United States. Congest Heart Fail. 2008;14:266–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krumholz HM, Merrill AR, Schone EM, Schreiner GC, Chen J, Bradley EH, et al. Patterns of hospital performance in acute myocardial infarction and heart failure 30-day mortality and readmission. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:407–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bueno H, Ross JS, Wang Y, Chen J, Vidán MT, Normand S-LT, et al. Trends in length of stay and short-term outcomes among Medicare patients hospitalized for heart failure, 1993–2006. JAMA. 2010;303:2141–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marcoux RM, Larrat EP, Vogenberg FR. Accountable care organizations: an improvement over HMOs? P T. 2012;37:629–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare Program; Advancing Care Coordination Through Episode Payment Models (EPMs); Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payment Model; and Changes to the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model (CJR). Final rule. Fed Regist. 2017;82:180–651.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Averill RF, Hughes JS, Goldfield NI. Paying for outcomes, not performance: lessons from the Medicare inpatient prospective payment system. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011;37:184–92. 145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mok JM, Martinez M, Smith HE, Sciubba DM, Passias PG, Schoenfeld A, et al. Impact of a bundled payment system on resource utilization during spine surgery. Int J Spine Surg. 2016;10:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ugiliweneza B, Kong M, Nosova K, Huang KT, Babu R, Lad SP, et al. Spinal surgery: variations in health care costs and implications for episode-based bundled payments. Spine. 2014;39:1235–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. U.S. Department of Health USD, Services H, Others. Better, smarter, healthier: in historic announcement, HHS sets clear goals and timeline for shifting Medicare reimbursements from volume to value. Washington, DC. 2015

    Google Scholar 

  17. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services CFM, Others. Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative: general information. Available at https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/bundled-payments/View in Article. Accessed July 13, 2017, 2015.

  18. Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative: General Information | Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation [Internet]. [cited 9 Feb 2018]. Available: https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/bundled-payments/

  19. Mistichelli J. Diagnosis related groups (DRGs). Bioethics Research Library, Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University; 1984.; Available: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/556896

  20. Birkmeyer JD, Gust C, Baser O, Dimick JB, Sutherland JM, Skinner JS. Medicare payments for common inpatient procedures: implications for episode-based payment bundling. Health Serv Res. 2010;45:1783–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller HD. From volume to value: better ways to pay for health care. Health Aff. 2009;28:1418–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abelson R. In bid for better care, surgery with a warranty. NY Times. 2007;17: 531–533.

    Google Scholar 

  23. MACRA: MIPS & APMs. 2017.; Available: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs.html

  24. Home. 2017.; Available: https://www.cms.gov

  25. Ibrahim SA, Kim H, McConnell KJ. The CMS Comprehensive care model and racial disparity in joint replacement. JAMA. 2016;316:1258–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blue Cross Blue Shield. Media Center | Blue Cross Blue Shield North Carolina [Internet]. [cited 14 Feb 2018]. Available: http://mediacenter.bcbsnc.com

  27. Dummit LA, Kahvecioglu D, Marrufo G, Rajkumar R, Marshall J, Tan E, et al. Association between hospital participation in a Medicare bundled payment initiative and payments and quality outcomes for lower extremity joint replacement episodes. JAMA. 2016;316:1267–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Resnick DK, Tosteson ANA, Groman RF, Ghogawala Z. Setting the equation: establishing value in spine care. Spine. 2014;39:S43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:968–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. MacLellan L. The $100 billion per year back pain industry is mostly a hoax. In: Quartz [Internet]. Quartz; 26 Jun 2017 [cited 9 Feb 2018]. Available: https://qz.com/1010259/the-100-billion-per-year-back-pain-industry-is-mostly-a-hoax/

  31. Martin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Hollingworth W, et al. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008;299:656–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Davis MA, Onega T, Weeks WB, Lurie JD. Where the United States spends its spine dollars: expenditures on different ambulatory services for the management of back and neck conditions. Spine. 2012;37:1693–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen E, Tong KB, Laouri M. Surgical treatment patterns among medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2010;10:588–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Goz V, Weinreb JH, McCarthy I, Schwab F, Lafage V, Errico TJ. Perioperative complications and mortality after spinal fusions: analysis of trends and risk factors. Spine. 2013;38:1970–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schoenfeld AJ, Harris MB, Liu H, Birkmeyer JD. Variations in Medicare payments for episodes of spine surgery. Spine J. 2014;14:2793–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sood N, Huckfeldt PJ, Escarce JJ, Grabowski DC, Newhouse JP. Medicare’s bundled payment pilot for acute and postacute care: analysis and recommendations on where to begin. Health Aff. 2011;30:1708–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Miller DC, Gust C, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer N, Skinner J, Birkmeyer JD. Large variations in Medicare payments for surgery highlight savings potential from bundled payment programs. Health Aff. 2011;30:2107–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cutler DM, Ghosh K. The potential for cost savings through bundled episode payments. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1075–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Oren J, Hutzler LH, Hunter T, Errico T, Zuckerman J, Bosco J. Decreasing spine implant costs and inter-physician cost variation: the impact of programme of cost containment on implant expenditure in spinal surgery. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:1102–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kazberouk A, McGuire K, Landon BE. A survey of innovative reimbursement models in spine care. Spine. 2016;41:344–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sullivan R, Jarvis LD, O’Gara T, Langfitt M, Emory C. Bundled payments in total joint arthroplasty and spine surgery. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10:218–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010;303:1259–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Schoenfeld AJ, Weiner BK, Smith HE. Regional variation and spine care: an historical perspective. Spine. 2011;36:1512–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bundled Care Program Failed to Reduce Fusion Surgery Costs. The Back Letter; 2018;33. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BACK.0000529682.00072.aa, 33.

  45. Jubelt LE, Goldfeld KS, Blecker SB, Chung W-Y, Bendo JA, Bosco JA, et al. Early lessons on bundled payment at an Academic Medical Center. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25:654–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamad Bydon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bydon, M., Elminawy, M., Alvi, M.A. (2019). Conditions of Care and Episode Groups. In: Ratliff, J., Albert, T., Cheng, J., Knightly, J. (eds) Quality Spine Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97990-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97990-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97989-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97990-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics