Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

HIV telehealth: framing the dialog and debate for reaching community consensus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Telehealth is a promising innovation in HIV care and services. It holds promise to leverage health information technology, (HIT), for expanding the benefits of treatment to underserved groups and Persons Living With HIV/AIDS, (PLWHA) dwelling in remote areas. The exploration of telehealth service structure, processes and effects is a useful starting point for clarifying expectations and setting benchmarks. Northeast Florida Ryan White network is in an early stage of telemedicine development and implementation. Learning from others is key to the design of effective telehealth services. Outlined here are essential tenets for framing consensus regarding the delivery, oversight, and evaluation of teleservices in Jacksonville, Florida. Multiple stakeholders are vested in the implementation of telehealth. Health services policy can inform the evolution of HIV teleservices in Northeast Florida and elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Telehealth Advisory Council. Expanding Florida's use and accessibility of telehealth. 2017. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from http://www.ahca.myflorida.com/SCHS/telehealth/docs/TAC_Report.pdf.

  2. HRSA: A Living History – Ryan White & Global HIV/AIDS Programs (n. d). Retrieved October 9, 2018, from https://hab.hrsa.gov/livinghistory/issues/rural_8.htm.

  3. Davies M, Goffman R, May J, et al. Large-scale no-show patterns and distributions for clinic operational research. Healthcare. 2016;4(15):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare4010015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hwang AS, Atlas SJ, Cronin P, et al. Appointment “no-shows” are an independent predictor of subsequent quality of care and resource utilization outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(10):1426–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3252-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lohr KN, Steinwachs DM. Health services research: an evolving definition of the field. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(1):15–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.01020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper V, Clatworthy J, Youssef E, et al. Which aspects of health care are most valued by people living with HIV in high-income countries? A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):677–92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1914-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siddiqui J, Herchline T, Kahlon S, et al. Infectious diseases society of America position statement on telehealth and telemedicine as applied to the practice of infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(3):237–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Doarn CR, Pruitt S, Jacobs J, et al. Federal Efforts to define and advance telehealth—a work in Progress. Telemed E-Health. 2014;20(5):409–18. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bashshur RL, Shannon G. National Telemedicine Initiatives: essential to healthcare reform. Telemed E-Health. 2009;15(6):600–10. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2009.9960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weinstein RS, Lopez AM, Joseph BA, et al. Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: opportunities and barriers. Am J Med. 2014;127(3):183–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. CCHP What is telehealth?. n.d. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://www.cchpca.org/what-is-telehealth.

  12. Florida Administrative Code & Florida Administrative Register. 2016. Retrieved from https://www.flrules.org/gateway/RuleNo.asp?title=STANDARDS%20OF%20PRACTICE%20FOR%20MEDICAL%20DOCTORS&ID=64B8-9.0141.

  13. 42 CFR Ch. IV (10–1-11 Edition). Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2011-title42-vol2/pdf/CFR-2011-title42-vol2-sec410-78.pdf.

  14. CDC. (2018). The Public Health System & the 10 Essential Public Health Services. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/stltpublichealth/publichealthservices/essentialhealthservices.html.

  15. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (ICN 901705). MLN booklet: telehealth services. 2018. Retrieved February 8, 2019, From https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/TelehealthSrvcsfctsht.pdf.

  16. Mosa ASM, Yoo I, Sheets L. A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12(67):1–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-67.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wedi. Telehealth modalities. Retrieved September 18, 2018. 2018, From https://www.wedi.org/docs/resources/telehealth-modalities-white-paper.pdf?sfvrsn=0.

  18. Telemedicine (n. d). Retrieved September 18, 2018, from https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/benefits/telemed/index.html.

  19. Caceres C, Gomez EJ, Garcia F, Gatell JM, del Pozo F. An integral care telemedicine system for HIV/AIDS patients. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75(9):638–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.04.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. León A, Cáceres C, Fernández E, et al. A new multidisciplinary home care telemedicine system to monitor stable chronic human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: a randomized study. PLoS One. 2011;6(1 e14515):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014515.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dimock M. Defining generations: where millennials end and post-millennials begin. 2018. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/01/defining-generations-where-millennials-end-and-post-millennials-begin/.

  22. The Florida Senate. n.d.. CS/SB 280: Telehealth. Retrieved February 11, 2019, from https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2018/280.

  23. Edmunds M, Tuckson R, Lewis J, et al. An emergent research and policy framework for telehealth. EGEMs (Wash DC). 2017;5(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1303.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration, (HRSA), of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (HHS), under grant number HRSA-17-030, titled, Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part A HIV Emergency Relief Grant Program, for grant amount $6,033,537.00. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham F. Watts Sr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This corresponding author works for the city entity that receives funding directly from HRSA. The other authors are indirectly funded by HRSA through the directly funded city entity.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Telehealth client-clinician and system identification decision matrix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watts, G.F., Wilson, M.M. & Vaughan, H. HIV telehealth: framing the dialog and debate for reaching community consensus. Health Technol. 9, 251–256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-019-00310-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-019-00310-x

Keywords

Navigation