Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Conservation and enhancement of the green infrastructure as a nature-based solution for Rome’s sustainable development

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three quarters of the European population live in urban areas, which is expected to increase to over 80% by 2050. The well-being of urban citizens appears to be closely linked to the correlation between the growth of urban areas and to the availability of green spaces. The conservation and the enhancement of the Green Infrastructure (GI) can be considered a Nature-Based Solution (NBS) to improve the sustainability of urban development. From this perspective, it is important to identify priority areas close to existing GIs suitable to be preserved from further urban encroachment. Our study aims to draw up a methodology to identify priority areas and, accordingly, to expand the GIs. The main objectives are: (i) to identify the most sensitive areas of the GI to be preserved from urban encroachment; (ii) to locate arable lands in the vacant border territories between GIs and built-up areas, that, if converted into connected elements, would enhance the connectivity of the existing GIs whilst limiting land take; (iii) to define an index of priorities for increasing the GI territory by means of NBSs, taking into account the variability of GI coverage and level of legal protection for nature conservation across different neighborhoods in the city. This approach is applied to the GIs of the 15 administrative units of the municipality of Rome (Italy) as a case study. First, we focus on Urban Atlas classes to map the GIs in the municipality. We then use Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis, implemented by a free software toolbox GUIDOS, to identify the key components of the GIs, such as hubs (core areas) and links (bridges). Then, a simulated new scenario is provided by including within the current GIs the agricultural lands outside protected areas, but within a buffer zone of 300 m from the land take. If the aforementioned agricultural lands, amounting to about 8000 ha, were converted into GI elements, they could lead to the improvement of connectivity and limit land take. Finally, in order to expand the area of the GIs, priority areas are selected within each administrative unit using an index based on the budget allocation process. The proposed methodology could be used: (i) by decision makers, looking for NBS in the design and planning of sustainable development of the city; and (ii) to enhance GI connectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern J (2007) Green infrastructure for cities: the spatial dimension. In: Cities of the future: towards integrated sustainable water and landscape management. IWA Publishing

  • Amati M, Yokohari M (2006) TempForal changes and local variations in the functions of London's green belt. Landsc Urban Plan 75(1):125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson E (2006) Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Ecol Soc 11(1) http://www.ecologyandsocietyorg/vol11/iss1/art34/. Accessed 1 March 2017

  • Angel S, Parent J, Civco DL, Blei A, Potere D (2011) The dimensions of global urban expansion: estimates and projections for all countries 2000-2050. Prog Plan 7:53–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attorre F, Bruno M, Francesconi F, Valenti R, Bruno F (2000) Landscape changes of Rome through tree-lined roads. Landsc Urban Plan 49:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbati A, Corona P, Salvati L, Gasparella L (2013) Natural forest expansion into suburban countryside: gained ground for a green infrastructure? Urban For Urban Green 12(1):36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barranco RR, Silva FBE, Marin Herrera M, Lavalle C (2014) Integrating the MOLAND and the urban atlas geo-databases to analyze urban growth in European cities. J Map Geogr Libr 10:305–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict MA, McMahon ET (2002) Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. Renew Res J 20(3):12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwagen BG (2007) Connectivity in urbanizing landscapes: the importance of habitat configuration urban area size and dispersal. Urban Ecosystems 10(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuste J, Artmann M, Li J, Xie M (2015) Special issue on green infrastructure for urban sustainability. J Urban Plan D-Asce 141(3):A2015001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camagni R, Gibelli MC (2002) I costi collettivi della città dispersa. Alinea, Firenze

  • Capotorti G, Mollo B, Zavattero L, Anzellotti I, Celesti-Grapow L (2015) Setting priorities for urban Forest planning a comprehensive response to ecological and social needs for the metropolitan area of Rome (Italy). Sustainability 7(4):3958–3976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Q, Liu X, Wu J, He P (2014) MSPA-based urban green infrastructure planning and management approach for urban sustainability: case study of Longgang in China. J Urban Plan D-Asce 141(3):A5014006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirici G, Fattori C, Cutolo N, Tufano M, Corona P, Barbati A, Blasi C, Copiz R, Rossi L, Biscontini D, Ribera A, Morgante L, Marchetti M (2014) La realizzazione della carta delle formazioni naturali e semi-naturali e della carta forestale su basi tipologiche della regione Lazio. Forest@ - J Selvic For Ecol 11(1):65

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerici N, Vogt P (2013) Ranking European regions as providers of structural riparian corridors for conservation and management purposes. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 21:477–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corona P (2016) Consolidating new paradigms in large-scale monitoring and assessment of forest ecosystems. Environ Res 144:8–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dige G (2011) Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion. The concept of green infrastructure and its integration into policies using monitoring systems (RPRT). Technical Report 18. European Environment Agency Copenhagen Denmark. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/green-infrastructure-and-territorial-cohesion. Accessed 1 March 2017

  • EEA (2006) Urban sprawl in Europe. The ignored challenge. (EEA report no.10). Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_10

  • European Commission (2015) Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions & re-naturing cities. Final report the Horizon 2020 https://ec.europa.eu/research/environment/index.cfm?pg=nbs. Accessed 5 September 2016

  • Frondoni R, Mollo B, Capotorti G (2011) A landscape analysis of land cover change in the municipality of Rome (Italy): Spatio-temporal characteristics and ecological implications of land cover transitions from 1954 to 2001. Landsc Urban Plan 100(1):117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasparella L, Tomao A, Agrimi M, Corona P, Portoghesi L, Barbati A (2017) Italian stone pine forests under Rome’s siege: learning from the past to protect their future. Landsc Res 42(2):211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill SE, Handley JF, Ennos AR, Pauleit S, Theuray N, Lindley SJ (2008) Characterising the urban environment of UK cities and towns: a template for landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 87:210–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase D, Larondelle N, Andersson E, Artmann M, Borgström S, Breuste J, Gomez-Baggethun E, Gren Å, Hamstead Z, Hansen R (2014) A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts models and implementation. Ambio 43:413–433

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JAG, Madrinan LF (2011) Landscape fragmentation in Europe. Joint EEA-FOEN report, European Environmental Agency, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

  • Jim CY (2013) Sustainable urban greening strategies for compact cities in developing and developed economies. Urban Ecosystems 16(4):741–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S, Kim JO (2015) Morphological analysis of green infrastructure in the Seoul metropolitan area South Korea. Landsc Ecol Eng 11(2):259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karhu J (2011) Green Infrastructure Implementation: Proceedings of the European Commission Conference, 19 November 2010. Brussels, European Commission

  • Kasanko M, Barredo JI, Lavalle C, McCormick N, Demicheli L, Sagris V, Brezger A (2006) Are European cities becoming dispersed?: a comparative analysis of 15 European urban areas. Landsc Urban Plan 77:111–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landscape Institute (2009) Green infrastructure: connected and multifunctional landscape. Landscape Institute. https://www.landscapeinstitute.org/PDF/Contribute/GreenInfrastructurepositionstatement13May09.pdf. Accessed 20 October 2016

  • Madureira H, Andresen T, Monteiro A (2011) Green structure and planning evolution in Porto. Urban For Urban Green 10:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti M, Vizzarri M, Lasserre B, Sallustio L, Tavone A (2015) Natural capital and bioeconomy: challenges and opportunities for forestry. Ann Silvic Res 38(2):62–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Maricchiolo C, Sambucini V, Pugliese A, Munafò M, Cecchi G, Rusco E (2005) La realizzazione in Italia del progetto europeo Corine Land Cover 2000. Rapporti APAT 36, Roma

  • Masini E, Barbati A, Bencardino M, Carlucci M, Corona P, Salvati L (2018) Paths to change: bio-economic factors, geographical gradients and the land-use structure of Italy. Environ Manag 61(1):116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moldan B, Bilharz S (eds) (1997) Sustainability indicators: report of the project on indicators of sustainable development. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Hoffman A, Giovannini E (2005) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. In: OECD statistics directorate Paris https://www.oecd.org/std/42495745.pdf. Accessed 4 October 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Steingröver E, van Rooij S (2006) Ecological networks: a spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:322–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostapowicz K, Vogt P, Riitters KH, Kozak J, Estreguil C (2008) Impact of scale on morphological spatial pattern of forest. Landsc Ecol 23:1107–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrişor AI, Petrişor LE (2015) Assessing microscale environmental changes: Corine vs the urban atlas. Pres Environ Sust Dev 9(2):95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirnat J, Hladnik D (2016) Connectivity as a tool in the prioritization and protection of sub-urban forest patches in landscape conservation planning. Landsc Urban Plan 153:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quatrini V, Barbati A, Carbone F, Giuliarelli D, Russo D, Corona P (2015) Monitoring land take by point sampling: pace and dynamics of urban expansion in the Metropolitan City of Rome. Landsc Urban Plan 143:126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quatrini V, Tomao A, Corona P, Ferrari B, Masini E, Agrimi M (2018) Is new always better than old? Accessibility and usability of the urban green areas of the municipality of Rome. Urban For Urban Green 37:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Gonzalez OM (2014) The green areas of San Juan Puerto Rico. Ecol Soc 19(3):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano B, Zullo F, Fiorini L, Ciabò S, Marucci A (2017) Sprinkling: an approach to describe urbanization dynamics in Italy. Sustainability 9(1):97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sallustio L, Perone A, Vizzarri M, Corona P, Fares S, Cocozza C, Tognetti R, Lasserre B, Marchetti M (2017) The green side of the grey: assessing greenspaces in built-up areas of Italy. Urban For Urban Green. Article in Press

  • Salvati L (2013) Urban containment in action? Long-term dynamics of self-contained urban growth in compact and dispersed regions of southern Europe. Land Use Policy 35:213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvati L, Ferrara C, Mavrakis A, Colantoni A (2016) Toward forest “sprawl”: monitoring and planning a changing landscape for urban sustainability. J For Res 27(1):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanesi G, Colangelo G, Lafortezza R, Calvo E, Davies C (2016) Urban green infrastructure and urban forests: a case study of the metropolitan area of Milan. Landsc Res 42(2):164–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saura S, Vogt P, Velázquez J, Hernando A, Tejera R (2011) Key structural forest connectors can be identified by combining landscape spatial pattern and network analyses. Forest Ecol Manag 262(2):150–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siedentop S, Fina S, Krehl A (2016) Greenbelts in Germany's regional plans - an effective growth management policy? Landsc Urban Plan 145:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1997) Biogeographic approaches and the new conservation biology. In Pickett STA, Ostfeld RS, Shachak M, Likens GE (eds) The ecological basis of conservation. Heterogeneity, ecosystems, and biodiversity. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA, pp 274–284

  • Soille P (2003) Morphological image analysis: principles and applications, 2rd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Soille P, Vogt P (2009) Morphological segmentation of binary patterns. Pattern Recogn Lett 30:456–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarzia V (2003) European common indicators: towards a local sustainability profile. Ambiante Italia Research Institute, Milano, Italy, 211

  • Tomao A, Secondi L, Corona P, Giuliarelli D, Quatrini V, Agrimi M (2015) Can composite indices explain multidimensionality of tree risk assessment? A case study in an historical monumental complex. Urban For Urban Green 14:456–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomao A, Quatrini V, Corona P, Ferrara A, Lafortezza R, Salvati L (2017) Resilient landscapes in Mediterranean urban areas: understanding factors influencing forest trends. Environ Res 156:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomao A, Secondi L, Carrus G, Corona P, Portoghesi L, Agrimi M (2018) Restorative urban forests: exploring the relationships between forest stand structure, perceived restorativeness and benefits gained by visitors to coastal Pinus pinea forests. Ecol Indic 90:594–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhel R (coord) (2006) Urban sprawl in Europe: the ignored challenge. EAA Report 10(2):56

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Habitat (2015) International guidelines on urban and territorial planning: towards a compendium of inspiring practices. Nairobi. http://unhabitat.org/books/international-guidelines-on-urban-and-territorial-planning/. Accessed 11 September 2016

  • United Nations (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). In: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Uy PD, Nakagoshi N (2008) Application of land suitability analysis and landscape ecology to urban green space planning in Hanoi, Vietnam. Urban For Urban Green 7(1):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt P, Riitters K, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Wade TG, Wickham JD (2007) Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landsc Ecol 22:171–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley A (2006) Greenways: multiplying and diversifying in the 21st century. Landsc Urban Plan 76(1):252–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham JD, Riitters KH, Wade TG, Vogt P (2010) A national assessment of green infrastructure and change for the conterminous United States using morphological image processing. Landsc Urban Plan 94(3):186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landsc Ecol 17(4):355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Jinxing Z (2007) The failure and success of greenbelt program in Beijing. Urban For Urban Green 6(4):287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer WC (2005) In: Vince SW, Duryea ML, Macie EA, Hermansen LA (eds) Forests at the wildland-urban interface: conservation and managementEcological assessment and planning in the wildland-urban Interface: a landscape perspective. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 161–174

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy

    Barbara Ferrari, Anna Barbati, Emanuela Masini & Dalila Russo

  2. Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, Viale S. Margherita 80, 52100, Arezzo, Italy

    Valerio Quatrini & Piermaria Corona

Authors
  1. Barbara Ferrari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valerio Quatrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna Barbati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Piermaria Corona
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emanuela Masini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dalila Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valerio Quatrini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrari, B., Quatrini, V., Barbati, A. et al. Conservation and enhancement of the green infrastructure as a nature-based solution for Rome’s sustainable development. Urban Ecosyst 22, 865–878 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00868-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00868-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation