Abstract
There has been growing concern about aging and increasing needs for care services in our society. In the pursuit of independence and sustainable care for the elderly, emerging technological solutions based on ICT and robotics are expected to be essential. However, the integration of advanced assistive technologies into care services or the daily lives of elderly people is not straightforward. Moreover, the aging issue is a global one, and the solutions could be global as well. This raises the question how can we apply technological care solutions under different lifestyles, work cultures, and welfare policies in various countries and regions? In this chapter, we present the findings and remarks from a comparative study of Japanese and Finnish elderly care service systems, which was conducted as part of an international collaborative project called METESE (Meaningful Technologies for Seniors: Safety, Comfort and Joy). This study aimed to clarify the requirements and integration process of technologies in elderly care in these countries. We applied a mixed method approach, focusing on three types of stakeholders: the elderly, care personnel, and managers of care services. By combining and analyzing this data, we illustrate characteristics of elderly care and expectations for technologies in Japan and Finland from multiple perspectives. This analysis provides insights on how to integrate and harmonize technologies in different types of elderly care service systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This study was conducted as part of an international collaborative project called METESE (2015–2018), Meaningful Technologies for Seniors: Safety, Comfort and Joy. This project aimed at providing an integrative approach to develop, implement, and evaluate assistive technologies for the elderly and care work.
- 2.
The selection of the technologies was based on the aims of the METESE project and its consortium partners developing these technologies.
References
Akaka, M. A., Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2013). The complexity of context: A service ecosystems approach for international marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(4), 1–20.
Anttonen, A., & Karsio, O. (2016). Eldercare service redesign in Finland: Deinstitutionalization of long-term care. Journal of Social Service Research, 42(2), 151–166.
Campbell, R. (2014). Changes in care and family in Japan. In Y. Saito & U. Edvardsen (Eds.), Eldercare policies in Japan and Scandinavia (pp. 93–118). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
Campbell, J. C., Ikegami, N., & Gibson, M. J. (2010). Lessons from public long-term care insurance in Germany and Japan. Health Affairs, 29(1), 87–95.
Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2006). Innovation in care services for the elderly. The Service Industries Journal, 26(03), 303–327.
Edvardsson, B., & Olsson, J. (1996). Key concepts for new service development. The Service Industries Journal, 16(2), 140–164.
Fukuda, K., Watanabe, K., Fukuhara, T., Hamasaki, M., Fujii, R., Horita, M., & Nishimura, T. (2015). Text-mining of hand-over notes for care-workers in real operation – toward and employee-driven innovation. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on social computing and social media. Los Angeles, CA, pp. 30–38.
Fukuda, K., Watanabe, K., Miwa, H., Ylikauppila, M., Lammi, H., Niemelä, M., & Nishimura, T. (2017). Study on communication support for employees with ICT in elderly care. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on serviceology (ICServ2017). Vienna, Austria.
Fukuhara, T., Nakajima, M., Miwa, H., Hamasaki, M., & Nishimura, T. (2013). Design and implementation of a handover support system based on information recommendation in nursing homes. Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 28(6), 468–479. (in Japanese).
Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4–5), 537–556.
Grönroos, C. (1997). Value-driven relational marketing: from products to resources and competencies. Journal of Marketing Management, 13(5), 407–419.
Hayashi, R. (2014). Social security in Japan (2014 edition). National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (IPSS). http://www.ipss.go.jp/s-info/e/ssj2014/PDF/ssj2014.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2018.
Japan Times. (2018). Fewer foreigners than expected coming to Japan to work as caregiver trainees, data shows. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/12/01/national/fewer-foreigners-expected-coming-japan-work-caregiver-trainees-data-shows/. Accessed 31 Dec 2018.
Kawamoto, H., & Sankai, Y. (2005). Power assist method based on phase sequence and muscle force condition for HAL. Advanced Robotics, 19(7), 717–734.
Leroi, I., Watanabe, K., Hird, N., & Sugihara, T. (2018). “Psychogeritechnology” in Japan: Exemplars from a super-aged society. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4906.
MHLW. (2016). Long-term care insurance system of Japan. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/policy/care-welfare/care-welfare-elderly/dl/ltcisj_e.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2018.
MHLW. (2018). About the required number of caregivers based on the seventh care insurance plan (in Japanese). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/0000207323.html. Accessed 31 Dec 2018.
Ministry of Finance. (2018). Public services will be digitalised. https://vm.fi/en/public-services-will-be-digitalised. Accessed 16 Dec 2018.
Miskelly, F. G. (2001). Assistive technology in elderly care. Age and Ageing, 30(6), 455–458.
Miwa, H., Watanabe, K., Fukuhara, T., Nakajima, M., & Nishimura, T. (2015). Measurement and description of nursing-care service process. Transactions of the JSME, 81(822) (in Japanese).
Miwa, H., Watanabe, K., Määttä, H., Ylikauppila, M., & Niemelä, M. (2017). Comparison of Japanese and Finnish attitude regarding technology use in nursing-care service. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on serviceology (ICServ2017), Vienna, Austria.
Miwa, H., Watanabe, K., Ylikauppila, M., Kulju, M., & Niemelä, M. (2018). Time and motion study of nursing-care services in Japan and Finland. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on serviceology (ICServ2018). Taichung, Taiwan.
Niemelä, M., Miwa, H., Ylikauppila, M., & Watanabe, K. (2017). Acceptability and needs of seniors for care technologies in Finland and Japan: Who should give care and with which technologies? Work and labour in the digital future, WORK2017. Turku, Finland.
Obi, T., Ishmatova, D., & Iwasaki, N. (2013). Promoting ICT innovations for the ageing population in Japan. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(4), 47–62.
OECD. (2005). Long-term care for older people. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013). A good life in old age? Monitoring and improving quality in long-term care. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Peek, S. T., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J. M., & Wouters, E. J. (2016). Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology, 62(2), 226–237.
Pigage, L. C., & Tucker, J. L. (1954). Motion and time study. The University of Illinois Bulletin, 51(73), 9–10.
Rhee, J. C., Done, N., & Anderson, G. F. (2015). Considering long-term care insurance for middle-income countries: Comparing South Korea with Japan and Germany. Health Policy, 119(10), 1319–1329.
Salichs, M. A., Encinar, I. P., Salichs, E., Castro-González, Á., & Malfaz, M. (2016). Study of scenarios and technical requirements of a social assistive robot for Alzheimer’s disease patients and their caregivers. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(1), 85–102.
Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign: International Journal of Cocreation in Design and the Arts, 4(1), 5–18.
Shibata, T., & Wada, K. (2011). Robot therapy: A new approach for mental healthcare of the elderly—A mini-review. Gerontology, 57(4), 378–386.
Shimizutani, S. (2013). The future of long-term care in Japan. (RIETI discussion paper series 13-E-064). https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/13e064.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2018.
Siegel, C., Hochgatterer, A., & Dorner, T. E. (2014). Contributions of ambient assisted living for health and quality of life in the elderly and care services—A qualitative analysis from the experts’ perspective of care service professionals. BMC Geriatrics, 14, 122.
Solheim, M. (2014). Changes in family and informal care in Norway. In Y. Saito & U. Edvardsen (Eds.), Eldercare policies in Japan and Scandinavia (pp. 119–156). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
Steen, M., Manschot, M., & De Koning, N. (2011). Benefits of co-design in service design projects. International Journal of Design, 5(2), 53–60.
STM. (2018). The well-being and health sector’s artificial intelligence and robotics programme (Hyteairo). https://stm.fi/en/the-well-being-and-health-sector-s-artificial-intelligence-and-robotics-programme-hyteairo-. Accessed 31 Dec 2018.
THL. (2018). Social welfare and health care reform in Finland. https://thl.fi/en/web/social-welfare-and-health-care-reform. Accessed 19 Feb 2018.
Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63–72.
Wakui, T. (2016). Diversification of Japanese family caregiving arrangements and the emerging self-management caregiver support system. In Proceedings of HAT-MASH2016. Yokohama, Kanagawa.
Watanabe, K., & Mochimaru, M. (2017). Expanding impacts of technology-assisted service systems through generalization: Case study of the Japanese Service Engineering Research Project. Service Science, 9(3), 250–262.
Watanabe, K., Niemelä, M., Määttä, H., Miwa, H., Fukuda, K., Nishimura, T., & Toivonen, M. (2016). Meaningful technology for seniors: Viewpoints for sustainable care service systems. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on serviceology (ICServ2016). Tokyo, Japan.
Watanabe, K., Hyytinen, K., & Niemelä, M. (2017). Meaningful technology for seniors: Analytical framework for elderly-care service systems. Special session paper, The 5th international conference on serviceology (ICServ2017). Vienna, Austria.
Watanabe, K., Hyytinen, K., & Tuovila, H. (2018). Challenges in Integrating Assistive Technologies into Elderly Care Services: Comparative Study between Japan and Finland. European Review of Service Economics and Management, 6, 97–122.
Windrum, P. (2013). Multi-agent framework for understanding the success and failure of ServPPINs. In F. Gallouj, L. Rubalcaba, & P. Windrum (Eds.), Public-private innovation networks in services (pp. 88–112). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Windrum, P., & García-Goñi, M. (2008). A neo-Schumpeterian model of health services innovation. Research Policy, 37(4), 649–672.
World Bank. (2018). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org. Accessed 31 Dec 2018.
Yang, C. C., & Hsu, Y. L. (2012). Remote monitoring and assessment of daily activities in the home environment. Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics, 3(2), 97–104.
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by JST and Tekes in Strategic International Collaborative Research Program (SICORP).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Watanabe, K., Niemelä, M. (2019). Aging and Technology in Japan and Finland: Comparative Remarks. In: Toivonen, M., Saari, E. (eds) Human-Centered Digitalization and Services. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7724-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7725-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)