skip to main content
10.1145/3328020.3353952acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User experience design for older adults: experience architecture and methodology for users aged 60+

Published:04 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a study that combined interview and observation methods to explore the user experiences of 23 users aged 70+. Interviews involved questions about how and when users learned to use computers and the internet, as well as their usual online activities and difficulties completing those activities. Observations involved two sessions for each user: first, a naturalistic observation where the researcher recorded the participant interacting with the computer(s) in their home, demonstrating their typical internet use; second, a structured task analysis where participants completed a series of increasingly complex operations online, including searching for information on a specific topic, using web mapping tools, and interacting with a government website. Participants followed a think-aloud protocol during both observations, explaining the steps that they were taking and sharing their thought process and feelings with the researcher. The rich qualitative data from this work provides insights into the needs of this population in four specific areas---physical, cognitive, educational, and cultural---as well as design strategies for addressing those needs.

References

  1. Bowen, L. M. (2011). Resisting Age Bias in Digital Literacy Research. College Composition and Communication, 62, 586--607.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowen, L. M. (2012). Beyond Repair: Literacy, Technology, and a Curriculum of Aging. College English, 74, 437--457.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brajnik, G., & Giachin, C. (2014). Using sketches and storyboards to assess difference of age impact in user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72, 552--566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Campbell, O. (2015, February 5). Designing For The Elderly: Ways Older People Use Digital Technology Differently. Smashing Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2015/02/designing-digital-technology-for-the-elderly/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. The Center for Universal Design. (1997). The Principles of Universal Design (Version 2.0). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. Retrieved from https://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chadwick-Dias, A., McNulty, M., & Tullis, T. (2003). Web Usability and Age: How Design Changes Can Improve Performance. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Universal Usability (pp. 30--37). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Finn, K. (2013, October 7). Designing User Interfaces for Older Adults: Myth Buster. Retrieved April 1, 2016, from http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2013/10/designing-user-interfaces-for-older-adults-myth-busters.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365--387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hackos, J. T., & Redish, J. C. (1998). User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kang, N. E., & Yoon, W. C. (2008). Age- and experience-related user behavior differences in the use of complicated electronic devices. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 425--437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. KR Management. (2014). Sumter Grand & Sumter Place in the Villages. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from http://sumtergrand.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. McDermott, L. (2007, April 14). What's the Difference Between Usability and Accessibility? [Blog]. Retrieved from http://www.apaddedcell.com/what-s-the-difference-between-usability-and-accessibilityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nielsen. (2012, January 16). Thinking Aloud: The #1 Usability Tool. Retrieved March 25, 2017, from Nielsen Norman Group website: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/thinking-aloud-the-1-usability-tool/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2015). Americans' Internet Access: 2000--2015. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Pirkl, J. J. (2009). The Demographics of Aging. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from http://transgenerational.org/aging/demographics.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Poushter, J. (2017). Smartphones are common in advanced economies, but digital divides remain. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/21/smartphones-are-common-in-advanced-economies-but-digital-divides-remain/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Roberts, S. C., Mehler, B., Orszulak, J., Reimer, B., Coughlin, J., & Glass, J. (2011). An Evaluation of Age, Gender, and Technology Experience in User Performance and Impressions of a Multimodal Human-Machine Interface. In Proceedings of the 2011 Industrial Engineering Research Conference (pp. 1--8). Institute of Industrial Engineers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rocco, M. (2015, March 26). Florida's The Villages is the Fastest-Growing City in America [News]. Retrieved April 28, 2015, from http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2015/03/26/florida-villages-is-fastest-growing-city-in-america/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rumsey, S. K. (2009). Heritage Literacy: Adoption, Adaptation, and Alienation of Multimodal Literacy Tools. College Composition and Communication, 60, 573--586.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sibley, C. (2008, December 1). Web Usability and Aging. Retrieved April 1, 2016, from http://www.usability.gov/get-involved/blog/2008/12/aging-and-usability.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Simon, H. (1996). The Science of Design: Creating the Artificial. In Sciences of the Artificial (pp. 111--138). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Siple, P. (2009). Design for the Aging Brain: Commentary on Dr. Gazzaley's The Aging Brain. User Experience, 8(1), 10--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, A. (2014). Older Adults and Technology use. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-and-technology-use/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun, H. (2012). Cross-Cultural Technology Design: Creating Culture-Sensitive Technology for Local Users. New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Theofanos, M. F., & Redish, J. G. (2005). Helping low-vision and other users with web sites that meet their needs: Is one site for all feasible?. Technical communication, 52(1), 9--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tofteland-Trampe, R. (2017). Crossing the Divide: Implications for Technical Communication User Advocates, 64(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. United Nations. (2009). World Population Ageing 2009. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Population Division). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/WPA2009/WPA2009_WorkingPaper.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Information Architecture Basics. Retrieved April 28, 2017, from https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/information-architecture.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilkinson, C., & Gandhi, D. (2015). Future Proofing Tomorrow's Technology: UX for an Aging Population. User Experience Magazine, 15(1). Retrieved from http://uxpamagazine.org/future-proofing-tomorrows-technology/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. User experience design for older adults: experience architecture and methodology for users aged 60+

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SIGDOC '19: Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
      October 2019
      308 pages
      ISBN:9781450367905
      DOI:10.1145/3328020

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGDOC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate85of105submissions,81%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader