skip to main content
10.1145/3159450.3159467acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Landscape Study of Computer Science Education in NYC: Early Findings and Implications for Policy and Practice

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

NYC's Computer Science for All (CS4All) is a 10-year, districtwide initiative aimed at providing high-quality computer science (CS) education to all NYC public school students. It aspires to greatly increase the number of students, teachers, and schools exposed to CS in NYC, and to offer meaningful learning experiences that build on prior exposure and skills at every grade level. These plans include providing high-quality professional development (PD) to some 5,000 teachers, designed to help them learn new programs and pedagogies in CS education, as well as strategies for integrating CS into existing courses. This paper presents findings from an assessment of CS in NYC, conducted in the second year of the CS4All initiative. Using a telephone survey of a representative sample of schools, we describe the current state of CS programming and training in the City. Overall, we found high participation in CS teacher training opportunities (both through and independent of the initiative) and widespread offering of CS courses Specifically, we estimate just over half of schools districtwide (56%) participated in some type of CS training in the 2015-16 school year, and about two thirds of schools (64%) offered students some kind of CS coursework in the 2016-17 school year (through either stand-alone CS courses or the integration of CS into other subjects). The type of programming and training varied by school level (elementary, middle and high). We also explored the extent to which programming and training are reaching schools and students who are historically underrepresented in CS--including women and girls, students of color, low-income students and students with disabilities. We found that schools offering CS courses and activities served fewer Black and Latino students and more White and Asian Students, compared with schools not offering CS. This work is unique, as it is the only districtwide assessment of CS education conducted anywhere in the country to date, thus adding to an under-researched but important and growing field of study

References

  1. Code.org. 2017. Girls set AP Computer Science record...skyrocketing growth outpaces boys. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@codeorg/girls-set-ap-computer-science-record-skyrocketing-growth-outpaces-boys-41b7c01373a5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Code.org. 2017. K-12 Computer Science Policy and Implementation in States. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J3TbEQt3SmIWuha7ooBPvlWpiK-pNVIV5uuQEzNzdkE/editGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Leigh Ann DeLyser and Michael Preston. 2015. A public school model of CS education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (FECS). The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp), 233--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Google Inc. & Gallup Inc. 2016. Trends in the State of Computer Science in U.S. K-12 Schools. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/j291E0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jane Margolis, et al. 2010. Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. NYC Department of Education. About-CS4All. 2017. Retrieved from http://cs4all.nyc/about/#eeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. NYC Department of Education. 2017. Demographic snapshot. Retrieved from http://schools.nyc.gov/NR/rdonlyres/77954FB0-FD24--476B-AB81--3E9BBE8655D9/213559/DemographicSnapshot201213to201617Public_FINAL1.xlsxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Vogel, R. Santo, R., & D. Ching. 2017. Visions of Computer Science Education: Unpacking Arguments for and Projected Impacts of CS4All Initiatives. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 609--614. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jennifer Wang, et al. 2016. Landscape of k-12 computer science education in the US: Perceptions, access, and barriers. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. Wilson, L.A. Sudol, C. Stephenson, & M. Stehlik. 2010. Running on empty. Association for Computing Machinery & Computer Science Teachers Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Landscape Study of Computer Science Education in NYC: Early Findings and Implications for Policy and Practice

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 2018
      1174 pages
      ISBN:9781450351034
      DOI:10.1145/3159450

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 February 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate161of459submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader