Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Routine Axillary Ultrasound for Patients with T1–T2 Breast Cancer Does Not Increase the Rate of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Based on Predictive Modeling

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Since publication of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial results, demonstrating that many patients with nonpalpable axillary lymph nodes and one or two positive sentinel nodes do not require axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), preoperative axillary ultrasound (AUS) has become controversial. Clinicians are concerned that AUS may lead to unnecessary ALND. The authors developed an algorithm (Algorithm 1) in which the number of AUS-suspicious nodes and tumor biology direct management. For estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) breast cancer with a single AUS-suspicious node and a positive lymph node needle biopsy (LNNB), sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is performed with a specimen X-ray documenting retrieval of the clipped node. Other patients with positive LNNB receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The authors hypothesized that routine AUS and this algorithm could decrease ALND compared with a strategy of no preoperative AUS.

Methods

Decision-tree analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were used to assess the expected number of ALNDs under two strategies (routine AUS vs no AUS). Probabilities were drawn from a literature review and an institutional database. The authors assumed nodal pathologic complete response rates as reported in the literature. Four additional algorithms were created to assess whether any other treatment model could decrease the rate of ALND.

Results

Using the routine AUS and the authors’ algorithm, the predicted ALND rate was 9%, versus 10% for a strategy of no AUS, with overlapping uncertainty intervals. The remaining treatment algorithms showed similar results.

Discussion

Use of AUS may help to tailor patient care without leading to overutilization of ALND, as long as neoadjuvant chemotherapy is administered when appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305:569–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwentner L, Helms G, Nekljudova V, et al. Using ultrasound and palpation for predicting axillary lymph node status following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from the multi-center SENTINA trial. Breast. 2016; 31:202–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boughey JC, Ballman KV, Hunt KK, et al. Axillary ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its impact on sentinel lymph node surgery: results from the American College of Surgeons Oncology group Z1071 trial (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3386–93

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris C, Tran H, Lee K, et al. Positive ultrasound-guided lymph node needle biopsy in breast cancer may not mandate axillary lymph node dissection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:3004–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pilewskie M, Jochelson M, Gooch JC, Patil S, Stempel M, Morrow M. Is preoperative axillary imaging beneficial in identifying clinically node-negative patients requiring axillary lymph node dissection? J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222:138–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Wely BJ, de Wilt JH, Francissen C, Teerenstra S, Strobbe LJ. Meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the selection of patients with extensive axillary tumour burden in breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2015;102:159–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S, et al. Improved axillary evaluation following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of targeted axillary dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34:1072–8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson RS, Mylander C, Rosman M, et al. Normal axillary ultrasound excludes heavy nodal disease burden in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boileau JF, Poirier B, Basik M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study. Clin Oncol. 2015;33:258–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mamtani A, Barrio AV, King TA, et al. How often does neoadjuvant chemotherapy avoid axillary dissection in patients with histologically confirmed nodal metastases? Results of a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3467–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Breast Cancer (version 2.2017). Retrieved August 2017 at https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physiciangls/pdf/breastblocks.pdf.

  12. Chichester T, Mylander C, Jackson RS, Rosman M, Cologer S, Andrade R, Tafra L. Combining pathologic data with axillary ultrasound information reliably identifies a large number of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients as node-negative. In: Oral presentation at the American Society of Breast Surgeons 2016 Annual Meeting; 2016.

  13. U.S. National Library of Medicine Clinical Trials. A randomized phase III trial comparing axillary lymph node dissection to axillary radiation in breast cancer patients (cT1-3 N1) who have positive sentinel lymph node disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT01901094). Retrieved February 2018 at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01901094.

  14. Tucker NS, Cyr AE, Foluso OA, et al. Axillary ultrasound accurately excludes clinically significant lymph node disease in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2016;264:1098–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schipper RJ, van Roozendaal LM, de Vries B, Pijnappel RM, Beets-Tan RG, Lobbes MB, Smidt ML. Axillary ultrasound for preoperative nodal staging in breast cancer patients: is it of added value? Breast. 2013;22:1108–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abe H, Schacht D, Sennett CA, Newstead GM, Schmidt RA. Utility of preoperative ultrasound for predicting pN2 or higher-stage axillary lymph node involvement in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:696–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Park S, Park JM, Cho JH, Park HS, Kim SI, Park BW. Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with cytologically proven node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2858–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hieken TJ, Trull BC, Boughey JC, Jones KN, Retnolds CA, Shah SS, Glazebrook KN. Preoperative axillary imaging with percutaneous lymph node biopsy is valuable in the contemporary management of patients with breast cancer. Surgery. 2013;154:831–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi JS, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Kim EK, Yoon JH. False-negative results of preoperative axillary ultrasound in patients with invasive breast cancer: correlations with clinicopathologic findings. Ultrasound Med Biol. 38;2012:1881–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmed RH. HER2 expression is a strong independent predictor of nodal metastasis in breast cancer. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2016;28:219–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch PD, et al. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3657–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Wellington MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wellington, J., Sanders, T., Mylander, C. et al. Routine Axillary Ultrasound for Patients with T1–T2 Breast Cancer Does Not Increase the Rate of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Based on Predictive Modeling. Ann Surg Oncol 25, 2271–2278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6545-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6545-z

Keywords

Navigation