Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 124))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on sexual legal morality and sexual ethics. In the erotic domain, Dutch practice provides an ideal testing ground for liberal theory. Since the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s, the Netherlands has been in the vanguard of sexual emancipation, providing a unique opportunity to observe the liberal model in action. The chapter analyses Dutch legal history in this field in the light of the current philosophical debate concerning the harm principle.

In the public sphere liberal legal morality is to be preferred to Christian moralism and moral majoritarianism. Indeed, research among Dutch youth shows that the emancipation of their sex life and the free availability of pornography on the Internet have not brought about an increase in harmful sexual activities. In the private sphere of sexual ethics, too, the harm principle is adequate: because of its highly personal character, anything goes in erotic love, with only one limiting condition—the consent of the parties involved. This is preferable to Bataille’s sacral eroticism and Nagel’s good sex. For connoisseurs, the model of Multiple Love is recommended as a standard of perfection for non-morally good erotic love.

This chapter builds on Maris (2002, 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    More about Bataille in Chap. 5 on drug policy, particularly the section The right to be high.

  2. 2.

    These terms are explained in de Introduction.

  3. 3.

    As will be seen, it is unclear whether Nagel’s perfectionist model provides a moral ideal, or an immanent standard for the quality of sex as such. But his emphasis on symmetrical reciprocity obviously invites a moral interpretation, as given by Ketchum (1980).

  4. 4.

    Provided they are adults. Chap. 4 discusses sex with minors, particularly in cases of incest.

  5. 5.

    For prostitution in the 17th century, see the historical Chap. 2 Can we learn from history?

  6. 6.

    Peter Gay (1985) refers to diaries to show that for most middle class women the 19th century was not a ‘period of latency’: it was only their public image that had been adjusted.

  7. 7.

    According to Mill, the ‘appropriate region of human liberty’ comprises, first, freedom of consciousness, including freedom of thought, feeling, and ‘freedom of opinion and sentiment on all subjects, practical or speculative, scientific, moral, or theological’ (Mill 1977, p. 138), as well as freedom to express and publish opinions; secondly, freedom to frame a life plan that suits one’s tastes and pursuits; thirdly, freedom to associate with other individuals.

  8. 8.

    An explanation of rights is proffered in Utilitarianism: ‘To have a right, then, is, I conceive, to have something which society ought to defend me in the possession of. If the objector goes on to ask why it ought, I can give him no other reason than general utility’ (Mill 1977, p. 309). As indicated above, however, Mill’s qualitative version of utilitarianism has a strong liberal tenor.

  9. 9.

    Also see Chap. 6 on euthanasia.

  10. 10.

    Yet, offensive to public decency was a vague term that required further judicial specification. The Supreme Court held that writings are offensive in this sense only if they are exclusively aimed at arousal in an obscene way. This is not the case if the titillation is justified by a higher aim, such as in works of art or science. After all, otherwise the prohibition might include Velasquez’s Rokeby Venus and James Joyce’s Ulysses.

  11. 11.

    A contemporary version of Catholic natural law doctrine and sexual morality has been presented by Finnis (1997).

  12. 12.

    In 1972 Deep Throat ‘burst into the public consciousness’, bringing about a ‘transition from illicit stag films to the legal fictional narratives’ (Schaefer 2004, p. 371).

  13. 13.

    HR 22 February 1966, NJ 1966, 393.

  14. 14.

    In the UK, the 1967 Sexual Offences Act decriminalized homosexual acts between men, in accordance with the recommendation of the Wolfenden Report. In 2016 the government announced the ‘Allan Turing Law’ that pardons men who had been convicted before 1967. Allan Turing , a famous computer scientist, was convicted in 1952. Rather than going to jail, he preferred to be chemically castrated.

  15. 15.

    See Maris (1985).

  16. 16.

    I derive these findings from the surveys in Tovar et al. (1999), Diamond (1999), Frenken and Doomen (1984), and Hullu (1984).

  17. 17.

    As Diamond (1999) points out, the decrease in sexual violence in liberal countries does not necessarily affirm the catharsis theory. The cause might just as well be that in an open society women are more open to voluntary sex.

  18. 18.

    See Maris (1985). In Pornographies (2000), Leslie Green opposes feminists such as Dworkin and MacKinnon (1988) who identify all pornography with heterosexual male dominion over women, including gay porn. MacKinnon: ‘The capacity of gender reversals (dominatrix) and inversions (homosexuality) to stimulate sexual excitement is derived precisely from their mimicry or parody or negation or reversal of the standard arrangement. This affirms rather than undermines or qualifies the standard sexual arrangement as the standard sexual arrangement …’ (MacKinnon 1989, p. 144). Against this, Green denies that gender roles (active-passive) are repeated in same sex relations and porn. Gay sex is a class of its own, which does not mimic the straight world, nor reverse it. Moreover, the latter would imply that gay male porn breaks the hetero rule, instead of affirming it. Since pornography comes in different kinds, Green concludes, a general prohibition would infringe on the autonomy and equality of sexual minorities.

  19. 19.

    Also see Nussbaum (1995) on ‘Objectification’.

  20. 20.

    Also see Skipper’s criticism of Dyzenhaus . Dytzenhaus (1992) claims that Mill may be read in support of censoring pornography because of its indirect immaterial harm to women. Dyzenhaus refers to Mill’s plea in The Subjection of Women for breaking down social structures that keep women in their place. This would include porn that contributes to their subjected status: pornography eroticizes inequality by depicting women as eagerly giving in to the erotic wishes of men. Mill , says Dyzenhaus, would have agreed that porn moves women to internalize a ‘false consciousness’ of their female nature, which turns them into ‘willing slaves’ and prevents them from ‘acting as autonomous individuals’. This results in ‘a false appearance of consent’ (Dyzenhaus 1994, p. 539). Skipper (1993) objects that Dyzenhaus wrongly singles out pornography as a primary aim of censorship. Its influence on a supposed female false consciousness will be small, for most consumers are men. ‘Women’s literature’ texts present a more obvious target for censorship. Skipper is not impressed by Dyzenhaus’s assumption that pornography has an exceptional influence because it would ‘eroticize’ sex inequality. Romanticist and religious texts have a much stronger persuasive force: ‘Inequality can and has been romanticized, glorified, celebrated, patriotized, totemized, sacralized, proselytized, and aestheticized’ (p. 728). Skipper concludes that the ideological subordination of women should be subjected to public criticism, not to censorship.

  21. 21.

    As to MacKinnon’s argument that pornography should be viewed as harmful action rather than offensive speech, see Stark (1997).

  22. 22.

    According to Charlotte Witt (1997), the anti-porn feminist Catharine MacKinnon and the pro-porn feminist Nadine Strossen (1995) argue from two fundamentally different philosophical paradigms. In the holistic Hegelian-Marxist view of MacKinnon, individual free choice is limited by socially constructed asymmetrical gender roles that constitute one’s sense of identity. ‘Because our culture is misogynist, its core sexual values include the rape, abuse, and sexual harassment of women—the very values that are depicted and enacted in pornography, which MacKinnon thinks is our culture’s central sexual pedagogical institution’ (Witt 1997, p. 166). In MacKinnon’s view, pornography is a speech act that is encoded by the social structures, so that it does not make sense to distinguish between harmless pornographic publications and harmful sexual acts. Therefore censorship. By contrast, in Strossen’s individualistic liberal view individuals, male and female, are capable of autonomous choice in their sex life. To overcome social inequality, women should strive for an equal social status. Strossen sees pornography as a form of sexual expression, not as an act, so that porn, even if sexist, is not harmful. Production and consumption of pornography by women, says Strossen, contributes to their emancipation process. If Witt’s analysis is correct, censoring pornography does not make sense, regardless of which paradigm one chooses. In MacKinnon’s holistic view only a complete social revolution would do. If women were indeed indoctrinated by dominant sexist values, maternalistic prohibitions of one element of the suppressive system would be a specimen of impotent symbolic legislation.

  23. 23.

    Internet porn will stimulate solistic sex in the form of masturbation as well as interpersonal sexual exchange: ‘Sites like Nerve.com are thus an excellent example of the tendency to put to work the capacity for interactive fantasizing that computer-mediated communication promotes’ (Arvidsson 2002, p. 74).

  24. 24.

    See note 18 above.

  25. 25.

    The term pornofication is mostly used with a sense of alarm, see the Introduction to Coleman and Held (2014): ‘Beginning with the very idea of pornography’s impact on contemporary popular culture, whether it is phrased as the “porning” or “pornification” of culture or the recognition of the existence of porno chic, the pervasive presence of porn in most of our lives is obvious. Pornography has infiltrated and informs contemporary culture. In this respect, we as individuals are also “porned” beings. Insofar as culture informs who we are, our self-understanding, and thus creates a feedback loop whereby we create the culture that in turn shapes our identities, a porned culture is indicative of porned individuals, and porned individuals express and recreate their porned culture’ (p. xiii).

  26. 26.

    Which implies that 12% have preserved their virginity at the age of 24.

  27. 27.

    Three-quarters used a condom when they had sex for the first time; 55% of the boys and 63% of the girls used the pill; 40% of the boys and 45% of the girls used both (‘Double Dutch’). For a comparison with other Western countries, see Gabhainn et al. (2009) 54(S1–S7); also Currie et al. (2012), p. 193.

  28. 28.

    As remaining points of general concern, the study identifies lack of consent and gender differences. With regard to their first intercourse, 0,2% of the boys and 3,3% of the girls said that they had been forced to do so; 4,7% of the boys and 13,5% of the girls were persuaded; while 91,7% of the boys and 82,4% of the girls reported mutual consent. 7% of the girls and 2% of the boys had had involuntary intercourse. In sum, girls are more often victims of transgressions. (Also see Dukers-Muijrers et al. 2015). On average, girls experience more sexual problems, such as regularly not reaching orgasm (25%; boys 2%), or regularly not wanting sex (17%; boys 6%). Boys are more positive about porn: 33% find it instructive (girls 2%), 75% find it exciting (girls 22%). Their use thereof is considerably greater: 73% had visited a porno site during the previous year (girls 21%).

  29. 29.

    To avoid stereotypes: these are significant but merely relative differences between the diverse ethnic and social groups, which may only apply to a minority within these groups.

  30. 30.

    Of the Moroccan and Turkish boys, 10.7% reported to have forced someone to participate in sexual activities, which is three times more than in the case of ‘Dutch or Western’ boys, who score 3.2% (de Graaf et al. 2005, p. 63) . This implies that almost 90% of the former group did not use force. The percentage for Surinamese and Antillian boys is, respectively, 7.8 and 8.1%. Lowly-educated boys score 5.3%, highly-educated boys 2.9%.

  31. 31.

    Ovid’s amoral art of seduction re-echoes in Casanova’s love stories: ‘As for women, this sort of reciprocal deceit cancels itself out, for when love enters in, both parties are usually dupes’ (Casanova 1966, I, p. 27). More about Casanova’s hedonistic vision of love in Chap. 4 on incest.

  32. 32.

    In The Elementary Particles, the French novelist, Houellebecq (2001), maintains that the Sexual Revolution has deteriorated to a merciless sex market. The family and other traditional institutions that used to constitute barriers between the individual and the market have been swept away by plain hedonism. Since then absolute sexual freedom is dominant, and has degenerated into cynical selfishness and aggressive competition. Houellebecq’s protagonist, the sex-crazed Bruno with his unattractive appearance and short penis of only 12 cm., therefore inexorably ends up at the bottom of the free market of sexual relationships. He has no other choice than resorting to porn and sad solo sex. More about distributive justice and looks in Chap. 7 on Freaky Justice.

  33. 33.

    Bataille chose the incest taboo as a central theme in some of his pornographic novels, see Chap. 4 on incest.

  34. 34.

    Also see Chap. 6 on euthanasia, particularly regarding the taboo on killing. For the incest taboo, see Chap. 4.

  35. 35.

    In reference to Hare’s interpretation of the universalizability principle, in Hare (1963).

  36. 36.

    Note that sacral eroticism in Kierkegaard’s Christian version transcends everyday life in an ethical way that is the very opposite of Bataille’s pagan cosmic orgasms. Kierkegaard’s egocentric erotic amoralist also differs in kind from Bataille’s erotic transgressor who seeks dissolution in an egoless cosmic flow.

  37. 37.

    Fetishism is the same as ‘talking to someone else’s shoes’, bestiality ‘is like discussing Spinoza with a moderately intelligent sheep’. As Ketchum points out, Solomon’s condemnation of sadistic rape as ‘perverse’ does not hold. Solomon argues that it entails a breach in the communication. Ketchum notes that rapist and victim communicate their emotions and perfectly understand each other. The rapist expresses his feelings of lust and power, while his victim expresses her fear. The ‘only’ thing missing is mutual consent, but that element is not required in Solomon’s communication model, nor is symmetry. See Ketchum (1980), p. 149.

  38. 38.

    Moulton (1980) remarks that Nagel analyses a first flirtatious encounter of strangers, whereas most sex occurs between regular partners. ‘The comfort and trust and experience with familiar partners may increase sexual satisfaction’ (p. 111). In her view, intimacy is the distinctive feature of sexual relations, but this does not lead to a sex-specific non-moral concept of perversion: ‘normative judgments about sexual behavior should not be unrelated to the social and moral standards that apply to other social behavior’ (id.).

  39. 39.

    The view that ascribes an external end to ‘plain sex’, says Goldman , continues the moral tradition of Christianity in its rejection of the physical side of man as his animal ‘lower self’.

  40. 40.

    Unlike Goldman’s analysis, Ketchum’s ethical account includes sexual ‘perversion’: ‘Goldman argues that what is morally wrong in sexual behavior is what is morally wrong in other behavior, that sexual ethics is simply an instance of more general moral considerations. Unfortunately, he does not see fit to extend this principle to the concept of perversion’ (Ketchum 1980, p. 151) In spite of this moral terminology, Ketchum is not completely clear as to her intentions. She may only be trying to amend Nagel’s non-moral criterion of good sex, yet she explicitly introduces ethical standards.

  41. 41.

    Ketchum conceives of perverted sex as a subset of bad sex. With perverse activities, lack of mutuality constitutes an essential part of the desire of the pervert. With merely bad sexual behaviour, this lack is contingent. ‘If mutuality is a criterion of good sex, then universalizability will be the criterion of nonperverted sex’ (Ketchum 1980, p. 152).

  42. 42.

    Also see Giddens (1992).

  43. 43.

    See Laqueur (2003).

  44. 44.

    Unlike Goldman’s hedonistic definition of ‘plain sex’ as being aimed at the fulfilment of one’s desire for another person’s body, sexual pleasure may just as well be asocial. Also see Primoratz (1999), p. 43-46 on ‘plainer sex’.

  45. 45.

    In the same spirit, Mappes (2002) and Primoratz (2001).

  46. 46.

    See the nuanced argument on paedophilia in Primoratz (1999), p. 133-143. Also see Chap. 4 on incest.

  47. 47.

    Or, in the terms of Habermas (1987), an ideal speech community in which all members have an equal voice.

  48. 48.

    In a later publication, Nagel (1969) implicitly endorses thesis 1. His argument starts from a view of sex that comes strikingly close to Bataille’s ideal: ‘Sex is the source of the most intense pleasure of which humans are capable and one of the few sources of human ecstasy. It is also the realm of adult life in which the defining and inhibiting structures of civilization are permitted to dissolve and our deepest presocial, animal, and infantile natures can be fully released and expressed, offering a form of physical and emotional completion that is not available elsewhere’ (Nagel 2002, p. 46; I gratefully quote from a copy that the author gave me during my stay at New York University Law School in 2006). Therefore Nagel demands maximum individual liberty, but, unlike Bataille, within a system of equal rights: ‘The case for toleration and an area of protected privacy in this domain is exceptionally strong. Relations between the sexes form an important aspect of the public space in which we all live, but their roots in individual sexuality are so deep that the protection of individual freedom within the public sexual space is an overwhelmingly important aspect of the design of a system of individual rights’ (id., p. 46). This also holds for pornography. Nagel maintains that, because of ‘the personal importance and great variety of sexual feeling and sexual fantasy and of their expression’ (id., p. 46), pornography belongs ‘firmly to the private domain’ (id., p. 51). Against radical anti-porn feminists Nagel argues that pornographic fantasies should be granted immunity from prohibitions in the service of gender equality, provided the material does ‘not directly harm specific women’ (id., p. 49).

  49. 49.

    See my Twelve Loves (Maris 2002). Its successor, The Thirteenth Love (forthcoming), describes the collapse of the model into an Ovid -like battle of the sexes in which all is fair.

References

  • Aquinas T (2008a) Summa theological. At http://www.newadvent.org/summa/. Accessed 28 May 2010

  • Aquinas T (2008b) Summa theologicae Second Part of the Second Part, questions 153 and 154

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson A (2002) Netporn: the work of fantasy in the information society. In: Jacobs K, Janssen M, Pasquinelli M (eds) C’lick me: a netporn studies reader. Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam, pp 69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine (1887) The city of god. The Christian Literature Company, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker R, Elliston F (eds) (1975) Philosophy and sex. Prometheus Books, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry K (1979) Female sexual slavery. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataille G (1928) Story of the eye. http://www.totuusradio.fi/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/bataille_story_of_eye.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2017

  • Bataille G (1957) Erotism: death and sensuality. City Lights Books, San Fransisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataille G (1971–1988) Oeuvres Complètes. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataille G (1990) Eroticism. Marion Boyars, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataille G (1989) Tears of Eros. City Light Books, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumrin B (1975) Sexual immorality delineated. In: Baker R, Elliston F (eds) Philosophy and sex. Prometheus books, Buffalo, NY, pp 116–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller S (1980) Excerpt on pornography from against our will: men, women and rape. In: Lederer L (ed) Take back the night: women on pornography. William Morrow, New York, pp 30–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova G (1966) History of my life. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher J, Ferguson CJ, Hartley RD (2009) The pleasure is momentary … the expense damnable? The influence of pornography on rape and sexual assault. Aggress Violent Behav 14(5):323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman L, Held JM (eds) (2014) The philosophy of pornography. Contemporary perspectives. Rowman & Littlefield, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz A (2014) Sisters are Doi’ it for themselves: black women and the new pornography. In: Coleman L, Held JM (eds) The philosophy of pornography. Contemporary perspectives. Rowman & Littlefield, London, pp 225–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie C et al (eds) (2012) Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: report from the 2009/2010 survey. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen 2012 (Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No. 6). http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/163857/Social-determinants-of-health-and-well-being-among-young-people.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2017

  • Devlin P (1965) The enforcement of morals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond M (1999) The effects of pornography: an international perspective. In: Elias J et al (eds) Porn 101. Eroticism, pornography, and the first amendment. Prometheus Books, New York, pp 223–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukers-Muijrers NHTM, Somers C, Graaf H, de Meijer S, Hoebe CJPA (2015) Non-volitional sex in Dutch youth. Prevalence of non-volitional sex types and associated factors: a national sample of young people. Plos One, July 27, 2015. http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0132847&representation=PDF. Accessed 7 Nov 2017

  • Duncan T (2014) Utopic futures of the “Other”: pornography and the creative imaginary. In: Coleman L, Held JM (eds) The philosophy of pornography. Contemporary perspectives. Rowman & Littlefield, London, pp 249–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin A (1981) Pornography. Men possessing women. The Women’s Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin A, MacKinnon C (1988) Pornography and civil rights: a new day for women’s equality. Organizing Against Pornography, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Dytzenhaus D (1992) John Stuart Mill and the harm of pornography. Ethics 102(3):534–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyzenhaus D (1994) Pornography and public reason. Can J Law Jurisprud 7:261–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eindrapport van de commissie zedelijkheidswetgeving (1980) Staatsuitgeverij, ’s-Gravenhage

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg J (1985) Offense to others. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg J (1987 [1984]) Harm to others. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis JM (1997) The good of marriage and the morality of sexual relations: some philosophical and historical observations. Am J Jurisprud 42:97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken J, Doomen J (1984) Strafbare seksualiteit. Van Loghum Slaterus, Deventer

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabhainn SN, Baban A, Boyce W, Godeau E (2009) How well protected are sexually active 15-year olds? Cross-national patterns in condom and contraceptive pill use 2002–2006. Int J Public Health 54:S1–S7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay P (1985) Education of the senses; the Bourgeois Experience – Victoria to Freud. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • GGD Amsterdam (2006) Seksueel gedrag in een subcultuur van Tieners in Amsterdam Zuidoost. GGD Amsterdam, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1992) The transformation of intimacy. Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A (1980) Plain sex. In: Soble A (ed) The philosophy of sex. Contemporary readings. Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa, NJ, pp 119–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaf H de, Meijer S, Poelman J, Vanwesenbeeck I (2005) Seks onder je 25e. Seksuele gezondheid van jongeren in Nederland anno 2005. Eburon, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaf H de et al (2006) ‘Seks is een game’. Gewenst en ongewenst seksueel gedrag van jongeren op internet. Rutgers Nisso Groep, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaf H de, Kruijer H, Acker J van, Meijer S (2012) Seks onder je 25e. Seksuele gezondheid van jongeren in Nederland anno 2012. Eburon, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Graaf H de, Nikkelen S, Borne M Van den, Twisk D, Meijer S (2017) Seks onder je 25e: Seksuele gezondheid van jongeren in Nederland anno 2017. Eburon, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Green L (2000) Pornographies. J Polit Philos 8(1):27–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1987) The theory of communicative action. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare RM (1963) Freedom and reason. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart HLA (1963) Law, liberty and morality. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Heins M (1999) Reno v. American Liberties Union: The 1966 Communications Decency Act. In: Elias JE (ed) Porn 101. Eroticism, pornography, and the first amendment. Prometheus Books, New York, pp 92–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertog M den, Kromhout B (2001) Liefde en huwelijk in Nederland. Historisch Nieuwsblad, nr. 10/2001. http://www.historischnieuwsblad.nl/nl/artikel/5795/liefde-en-huwelijk-in-nederland.html. Accessed 2 Jan 2017

  • Hilkens M (2008) McSex: De pornoficatie van de samenleving. LJ Veen, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Houellebecq M (2001) The elementary particles. Vintage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hullu J de (1984) De strafrechtelijke en social-wetenschappelijke gronden vooe strafbaarstelling van pornografie. Gouda Quint, Arnhem

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs K, Janssen M, Pasquinelli M (eds) (2007) C’lick Me: A Netporn Studies Reader. Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketchum SA (1980) The good, the bad and the perverted: sexual paradigms revisited. In: Soble A (ed) The philosophy of sex. Contemporary readings. Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa, NJ, pp 139–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard S (1987) Either/Or. Part II. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchinsky B (1991) Pornography and rape: theory and practice? Evidence from crime data in four countries where pornography is easily availabl. Int J Law Psychiatry 14:47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundera M (1985) The unbearable lightness of being. Faber & Faber, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur W (2003) Solitary sex: a cultural history of masturbation. Zone Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer L (ed) (1980) Take back the night: women on pornography. William Morrow, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon CA (1989) Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mappes TA (2002) Sexual morality and the concept of using another person. In: Soble A (ed) The philosophy of sex. Contemporary readings, 4th edn. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp 207–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus S (1966) The other victorians. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse H (1966) Eros and civilisation. The Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis J (1975) The question of homosexuality. In: Baker, pp 288–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris CW (1985) Pornografie moet vrij. Filosofie en Praktijk 1:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris CW (2002) Twaalf liefdes. Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris CW (2013) Pornography is going on-line. Law Democr Dev 17:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer kansen voor vrouwen. Emancipatiebeleid 2008–2011, Den Haag 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1977) Utilitarianism, on liberty, essay on Bentham. Collins/Fontana, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton J (1980) Sexual behavior: another position. In: Soble A (ed) The philosophy of sex. Contemporary readings. Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa, NJ, pp 110–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1969) Sexual perversion. In: Soble A (ed), pp 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (2002) Concealment and exposure: and other essays. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum MC (1995) Objectification. Philos Public Aff 24(4):249–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovid, Ars Amatoria. At http://www.yorku.ca/pswarney/Texts/aa-kline.htm#_Toc521049272. Accessed 7 Nov 2017

  • Pam M (1979) Buikjeswrijven. De vijftien jaar lange kruisgang van Bob, Daphne en Han B. Aalberse. Vrij Nederland 17 November 1979: 5–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson Z (2004) Going on-line: consuming pornography in the digital era. In: Williams L (ed) Porn studies. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 104–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Penley C (2004) Crackers and wackers: the white trashing of porn. In: Williams L (ed) Porn studies. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 309–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Plasterk RHA (2007) Meer kansen voor vrouwen. Emancipatiebeleid 2008–2011. Ministerie van OCW, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Primoratz I (1999) Ethics and sex. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Primoratz I (2001) Sexual morality: is consent enough? Ethical theory and moral practice. Cultivating Emotions 4(3):201–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick S (1975) Better sex. In: Baker R, Elliston F (eds) Philosophy and sex. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY, pp 83–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer E (2004) Gauging a revolution: 16 mm film and the rise of the pornographic feature. In: Williams L (ed) Porn studies. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 370–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons Bradley J (2014) In the arms of the angel: playfulness, creativity and porn’s possibilities. In: Coleman L, Held JM (eds) The philosophy of pornography. Contemporary perspectives. Rowman & Littlefield, London, pp 261–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Skipper R (1993) Mill and pornography. Ethics 103(4):726–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soble A (ed) (1980) The philosophy of sex: contemporary readings. Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Soble A (ed) (2002) The philosophy of sex: contemporary readings, 4th edn. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon R (1975) Sex and perversion. In: Baker R, Elliston F (eds) Philosophy and sex. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY, pp 268–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon R (1980) Sexual paradigms. In: Soble A (ed) The philosophy of sex. Contemporary Readings. Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa, NJ, pp 89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark CA (1997) Is pornography an action?: The causal vs. the conceptual view of pornography’s harm. Soc Theory Pract Summer 97, 23(2):277–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Strossen N (1995) Defending pornography: free speech, sex, and the fight for women’s rights. Scribner’s, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovar E, Elias J, Chang J (1999) Effects of pornography on sexual offending. In: Elias J et al (eds) Porn 101. Eroticism, pornography, and the first amendment. Prometheus Books, New York, pp 261–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweede interimrapport van de adviescommissie zedelijkheidswetgeving. Bijlage bij de memorie van toelichting, Tweede Kamer, zitting 1979–1980, 15836, nr. 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatyayana M (2009) Kamasutra. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Weininger O (1906) Sex and character. A.L. Burt Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams L (ed) (2004a) Porn studies. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams L (2004b) Skin flicks on the racial border: pornography, exploitation, and interracial lust. In: Williams L (ed) Porn studies. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 269–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J (1967) Logic and sexual morality. Penguin Books, Hammondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt C (1997) Pornography. NWSA J, Sexual Harassment 9(2, Summer):165–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters C (2004) Sex and manners: female emancipation in the West 1890–2000. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maris, C. (2018). Sex, Morality and Law. In: Tolerance : Experiments with Freedom in the Netherlands. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 124. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89346-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89346-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89344-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89346-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics