Skip to main content
Log in

Informatics, Information Science, and Computer Science

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

In this paper, we draw a distinction between information and computer sciences in terms of their objects and directions of research. In terms of the operating mode, we distinguish among automatic, automated, semi-automatic, and assistant systems and show that in each application domain there can be different configurations of these systems at different periods of time. In addition, we analyze the engineering, linguistic, and mathematical levels of domain-specific research and development, formulate their problems, and discuss promising directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yatsko, V.A., The principles for the investigation of the historical development of computer science, Sci. Tech. Inf. Process., 2017, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chernyi, Yu.Yu., Polysemy in science: When is it harmful? (on the example of computer science), Otkrytoe Obraz., 2010, no. 6, p. 97–107. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/polisemiya-v-nauke-kogda-ona-vredna-naprimere-informatiki.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chernyi, Yu.Yu., Informatics in the USSR and Russia. 1966–2010, 2010. http://inion.ru/resources/tematich eskie-resursy/biblioteca-informatica/ch-ia/chernyi-informatika-v-sssr-i-rossii-1966-2010/.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Semenyuk, E.P., The idea of informatology in the context of the modern development of science and social practice, in Problemy infovzaimodeistviya. Mezhdunar. nauchn. sborn. (Problems of Information Interaction. International Scientific Compilation), Novosibirsk: Novosib. Elektrotekh. Inst. Svyazi, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Volkova, V., Facet multidimensionality and ambivalence of computer science. On the 80th anniversary of A.V. Sokolov, Prikl. Inf., 2014, no. 1, pp. 114–124. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/fasetnaya-mnogomernost-i-ambivalentnost-informatiki-k-80-letiyu-a-vsokolova.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yatsko, V.A., Automatic text classification method based on Zipf’s law, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2015, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yatsko, V., Shilov, S., and Vishniakov, T., A semi-automatic text summarization system, Proceedings of the 10 International Conference on Speech and Computer, Patras, 2005, pp. 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sysoeva, I.A., Translation memory systems, Perspekt. Nauki, 2013, no. 12, pp. 36–38.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shou, L., Wang, Z., Chen, K., and Chen, G., Sumblr: Continuous summarization of evolving tweet streams, Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '13), New York, 2013, pp. 533–542. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2484028.2484045. doi 10.1145/2484028.248404510.1145/2484028.2484045

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Alvanaki, F., Sebastian, M., Ramamritham, K., and Weikum, G., EnBlogue: Emergent topic detection in Web 2.0 Streams, Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '11), New York, 2011, pp. 1271–1274. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1989323.1989473.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Hasan, L., Mottaqiallah, T., and Zafar, H., Performance evaluation for field programmable gate arraybased bioinformatics sequence alignment, IETE J. Res., 2013, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sigmund, M. and Zelinka, P., Analysis of voice speech excitation due to alcohol intoxication, Inf. Technol. Control, 2011, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 145–150. http://itc.ktu.lt/index.php/ITC/article/view/429/680.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v gumanitarnykh issledovaniyakh (Information Technology in the Humanities), vol. 8: Razrabotka novykh metodov i informatsionnykh tekhnologii predstavleniya i obrabotki arkheologicheskikh i etnograficheskikh dannykh (Development of New Methods and Information Technologies for the Presentation and Processing of Archaeological and Ethnographic Data), Kholyushkin, Yu.P., Ed., Novosibirsk: Red.-Izd. Tsentr., 2004. http://www.prometeus. nsc.ru/elibrary/infohum/2004-008.pdf.

  14. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource, Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. D258–D261. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/32/suppl_1/D258/2505186.

  15. Lonskii, I.I., Kuzhelev, P.D., and Matveev, A.S., Vvedenie v MapInfo. Metodicheski rekomendatsii (Introduction to MapInfo. Methodical Recommendations), Moscow: MIIGAIK, 2014. http://miigaik.ru/library.miigaik. ru/uchebnieposobiya/20150324160653-8081.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bird, S. and Loper, E., NLTK: The natural language toolkit, Proceedings of the ACL 2004 on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions (ACLdemo '04), Stroudsburg, PA, 2004. https://dl.acm.org/citation. cfm?doid=1219044.1219075.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Jombart, T., Adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers, Bioinformatics, 2008, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1403–1405. https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/24/11/1403/191127.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Biron, P., Metzger, M.H., Pezet, C., Sebban, C., Barthuet, E., and Durand, T., An information retrieval system for computerized patient records in the context of a daily hospital practice: The example of the Léon Bérard Cancer Center (France), Appl. Clin. Inf., 2014, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 191–205. https://aci.schattauer.de/contents/archive/issue/1824/manuscript/20926.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jensen, P.B., Lars, J., Jensen, L.J., and Brunak, S., Mining electronic health records: Towards better research applications and clinical care, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2012, vol. 13, pp. 395–405. https://www.nature. com/articles/nrg3208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer, C.F., English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004. http://library.aceondo.net/ebooks/English_Language/English_Corpus_Linguistics_An_Introduction.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lincoln, T.L. and Parker, R.D., Medical diagnosis using Bayes theorem, Health Serv. Res., 1967, no. 2, pp. 34–45. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1065734/pdf/hsresearch00586-0036.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yatsko, V.A., Evaluation of the efficiency of the chisquare metric, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2016 vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Molecular Modeling. Methods and Application, 2014. http://qsar.chem.msu.ru/~dmitry_o/molmod_lecture_2014.pdf.

  24. Yatsko, V.A., Advantages and disadvantages of weighting terms according to the formula Tf*Idf, V Mire Nauchn. Otkrytii, 2013, no. 6, pp. 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Yatsko.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.A. Yatsko, 2018, published in Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i Metodika Informatsionnoi Raboty, 2018, No. 11, pp. 1–7.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yatsko, V.A. Informatics, Information Science, and Computer Science. Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. 45, 235–240 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688218040081

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688218040081

Keywords

Navigation