skip to main content
10.1145/3145574.3145598acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescssConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Weatherization Adoption in A Multilayer Social Network: An Agent-based Approach

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Energy conservation in residential buildings has been a topic of interest in recent years because of their high levels of energy consumption. Weatherization is set of approaches that can be used to make buildings more energy-efficient, thereby helping residents lower their energy bills and improving environmental sustainability. However, there are two significant challenges associated with weatherization adoption: high upfront investment costs with a long payback period, and minimal awareness of weatherization and its benefits. This paper proposes an agent-based model that will allow researchers to explore residents' socially-motivated energy conservation decisions by providing a realistic social context via a multilayer social network and incorporating opinion dynamics based on the Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered epidemic model. Several experimental scenarios are run to demonstrate the model's potential to help policymakers determine how to encourage residential weatherization adoption.

References

  1. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2017. Annual Energy Outlook, https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2017).pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2017. Monthly Energy Review, https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/mer.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yong-Yeol Ahn, Seungyeop Han, Haewoon Kwak, Sue Moon, and Hawoong Jeong. 2007. Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 835--844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50, 2 (1991), 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Icek Ajzen, Nicholas Joyce, Sana Sheikh, and Nicole Gilbert Cote. 2011. Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: The role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 33, 2 (2011), 101--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Shah Jamal Alam and Armando Geller. 2012. Networks in agent-based social simulation. In Agent-based models of geographical systems. Springer, 199--216.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kyle Anderson, SangHyun Lee, and Carol Menassa. 2012. Effect of social network type on building occupant energy use. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings. ACM, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kyle Anderson, SangHyun Lee, and Carol Menassa. 2013. Impact of social network type and structure on modeling normative energy use behavior interventions. Journal of computing in civil engineering 28, 1 (2013), 30--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Andrea Apolloni, Karthik Channakeshava, Lisa Durbeck, Maleq Khan, Chris Kuhlman, Bryan Lewis, and Samarth Swarup. 2009. A study of information diffusion over a realistic social network model. In Computational Science and Engineering, 2009. CSE'09. International Conference on, Vol. 4. IEEE, 675--682. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Polk County Assessor. 2015. Polk County Assessor. (2015). http://web.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/web/tt/infoqry.cgi?tt=home/indexGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Elie Azar and Carol C Menassa. 2011. Agent-based modeling of occupants and their impact on energy use in commercial buildings. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 26, 4 (2011), 506--518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Albert-László Barabási. 2009. Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond. science 325, 5939 (2009), 412--413.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Albert-László Barabási and Réka Albert. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. science 286, 5439 (1999), 509--512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Eric Bonabeau. 2002. Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, suppl 3 (2002), 7280--7287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ron Boschma. 2005. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional studies 39, 1 (2005), 61--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Iowa Department of Human Rights Bureau of Weatherization. Brochure about the Weatherization Assistance Program. https://humanrights.iowa.gov/sites/default/files/media/Resources%20-%20Weatherization%20Brochure.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Meeyoung Cha, Fabrício Benevenuto, Yong-Yeol Ahn, and Krishna P Gummadi. 2012. Delayed information cascades in Flickr: Measurement, analysis, and modeling. Computer Networks 56, 3 (2012), 1066--1076. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. MideAmerican Energy Company. 2017. Iowa Electric Rates. (2017). https://www.midamericanenergy.com/iowa-rates.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Joshua M Epstein. 1999. Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity 4, 5 (1999), 41--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Magda Fontana, Pietro Terna, et al. 2015. From Agent-based models to network analysis (and return): the policy-making perspective. University of Turin (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonas Friege, Georg Holtz, and Emile JL Chappin. 2016. Exploring Homeowners' Insulation Activity. Journal of Artificial Societies & Social Simulation 19, 1 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Volker Grimm, Uta Berger, Donald L DeAngelis, J Gary Polhill, Jarl Giske, and Steven F Railsback. 2010. The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecological modelling 221, 23 (2010), 2760--2768.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynne Hamill and Nigel Gilbert. 2009. Social circles: A simple structure for agent-based social network models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12, 2 (2009), 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Paul Harland, Henk Staats, and Henk AM Wilke. 1999. Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of applied social psychology 29, 12 (1999), 2505--2528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Rainer Hegselmann, Ulrich Krause, et al. 2002. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of artificial societies and social simulation 5, 3 (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Charvi Jagani and Ulrike Passe. 2017. Simulation-based Sensitivity Analysis of Future Climate Scenario Impact on Residential Weatherization Initiatives in the US Midwest. In Simulation for Architecture and Urban Design (SimAUD) conference. The Society for Modeling and Simulation International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rishee K Jain, Rimas Gulbinas, John E Taylor, and Patricia J Culligan. 2013. Can social influence drive energy savings? Detecting the impact of social influence on the energy consumption behavior of networked users exposed to normative eco-feedback. Energy and Buildings 66 (2013), 119--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Peter Kaufmann, Sigrid Stagl, and Daniel W Franks. 2009. Simulating the diffusion of organic farming practices in two New EU Member States. Ecological Economics 68, 10 (2009), 2580--2593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Caroline C Krejci, Michael C Dorneich, Ulrike Passe, and Nathan Peters. 2016. A hybrid simulation model for urban weatherization programs. In Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE Press, 1630--1641. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Michael Y Li and James S Muldowney. 1995. Global stability for the SEIR model in epidemiology. Mathematical biosciences 125, 2 (1995), 155--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Michael W Macy and Robert Willer. 2002. From factors to factors: computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual review of sociology 28, 1 (2002), 143--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Menzie McEachern and Susan Hanson. 2008. Socio-geographic perception in the diffusion of innovation: solar energy technology in Sri Lanka. Energy Policy 36, 7 (2008), 2578--2590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Megan McMichael and David Shipworth. 2013. The value of social networks in the diffusion of energy-efficiency innovations in UK households. Energy Policy 53 (2013), 159--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Michael Meadows and Dave Cliff. 2012. Reexamining the relative agreement model of opinion dynamics. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 15, 4 (2012), 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Alan Mislove, Massimiliano Marcon, Krishna P Gummadi, Peter Druschel, and Bobby Bhattacharjee. 2007. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, 29--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Anuj Mittal, Wanyu Huang, and Caroline C Krejci. 2017. Consumer-adoption Modeling of Distributed Solar Using an Agent-based Approach. In The annual Computational Social Science conference. The Computational Social Science Society of the Americas. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Anuj Mittal and Caroline C Krejci. A hybrid simulation modeling framework for regional food hubs. Journal of Simulation (????), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Anuj Mittal and Caroline C Krejci. 2017. Integrating Consumer Preferences in Renewable Energy Expansion Planning Using Agent-based Modeling. In paper to be presented at the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference, Las Vegas, NV, December 3--6. IEEE Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Douglas S Noonan, Lin-Han Chiang Hsieh, and Daniel Matisoff. 2013. Spatial effects in energy-efficient residential HVAC technology adoption. Environment and Behavior 45, 4 (2013), 476--503.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. U.S. Department of Energy. 2017. WAP Fact Sheet. (2017). https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/05/f34/wap_factsheet_FINAL.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. IOWA Department of Human Rights. 2017. Income Guidelines. https://humanrights.iowa.gov/sites/default/files/media/LIHEAP_Wx_Income_Guidelines_FY17.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. IOWA Department of Human Rights. 2017. Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP). (2017). https://humanrights.iowa.gov/dcaa/weatherizationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. IOWA Department of Human Rights. 2017. Weatherization FAQs. (2017). https://humanrights.iowa.gov/dcaa/weatherization/weatherization-faqsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Johannes Palmer, Giovanni Sorda, and Reinhard Madlener. 2015. Modeling the diffusion of residential photovoltaic systems in italy: An agent-based simulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 99 (2015), 106--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Shannon Patton. 2013. Development of a future typical meteorological year with application to building energy use. Master's thesis. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Hazhir Rahmandad and John Sterman. 2008. Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: Comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Management Science 54, 5 (2008), 998--1014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Varun Rai and Scott A Robinson. 2015. Agent-based modeling of energy technology adoption: Empirical integration of social, behavioral, economic, and environmental factors. Environmental Modelling & Software 70 (2015), 163--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Christoph Reinhart, Timur Dogan, J Alstan Jakubiec, Tarek Rakha, and Andrew Sang. 2013. Umi-an urban simulation environment for building energy use, day-lighting and walkability. In 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Chambery, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Nina Schwarz and Andreas Ernst. 2009. Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovationsâĂŤan empirical approach. Technological forecasting and social change 76, 4 (2009), 497--511.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Brian G Southwell and Joe Murphy. 2014. Weatherization behavior and social context: the influences of factual knowledge and social interaction. Energy Research & Social Science 2 (2014), 59--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Energy Star. 2017. Federal Income Tax Credits for Energy Efficiency. (2017). https://www.energystar.gov/about/federal_tax_creditsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Fei-Yue Wang, Kathleen M Carley, Daniel Zeng, and Wenji Mao. 2007. Social computing: From social informatics to social intelligence. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22, 2 (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Duncan J Watts and Steven H Strogatz. 1998. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. nature 393, 6684 (1998), 440--442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Stephen Wilcox and William Marion. 2008. Users manual for TMY3 data sets. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Ingo Wolf, Jochen Nuss, Tobias Schröder, and Gerhard de Haan. 2012. The adoption of electric vehicles: An empirical agent-based model of attitude formation and change. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the European Association for Social Simulation. 93--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CSS 2017: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference of The Computational Social Science Society of the Americas
    October 2017
    194 pages
    ISBN:9781450352697
    DOI:10.1145/3145574

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 19 October 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader