Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient Survival After Simultaneous ALPPS and Colorectal Resection

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Liver resection combined with colorectal surgery (CRS) is the only curative option in many patients presenting with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases (CRLM). Simultaneous resection has been shown to offer benefits in patients with low hepatic tumor load; however, in the setting of in situ colorectal tumor with extensive CRLM and a small predicted future liver remnant (FLR), the use of simultaneous ALPPS and CRS is controversial, lacking outcome data.

Methods

Thirty-one cases of simultaneous ALPPS and CRS prospectively entered into the International ALPPS Registry were examined. Univariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with 90-day mortality after stage-2.

Results

Thirty patients (97%) completed both stages. CRS was performed during stage-1 in 22 patients (73%). Seven patients (23%) had severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) following stage-2 ALPPS. The 90-day mortality rate was 15%. Patients who had a severe complication after stage-1 were significantly more likely to have 90-day mortality following stage-2 (p = 0.002). MELD score > 10 on postoperative day-5 after stage-1 was also significantly associated with 90-day mortality (p = 0.011). Disease-free survival and overall survival were 36% and 76% at 1 year, respectively.

Conclusions

In light of the high mortality and poor long-term survival identified in this series, the adoption of ALPPS with CRS cannot be recommended without further data. Patients who suffer severe complications or have an elevated MELD score after stage-1 are at higher risk of mortality following stage-2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H et al (2012) Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 255:405–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hernandez-Alejandro R, Bertens KA, Pineda-Solis K et al (2015) Can we improve the morbidity and mortality associated with the associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure in the management of colorectal liver metastases? Surgery 157:194–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alvarez FA, Ardiles V, de Santibañes M et al (2015) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy offers high oncological feasibility with adequate patient safety: a prospective study at a single center. Ann Surg 261:723–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fard-Aghaie MH, Stavrou GA, Schuetze KC et al (2015) ALPPS and simultaneous right hemicolectomy—step one and resection of the primary colon cancer. World J Surg Oncol 13:124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yin Z, Liu C, Chen Y et al (2013) Timing of hepatectomy in resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM): simultaneous or delayed? Hepatology 57:2346–2357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feng Q, Wei Y, Zhu D et al (2014) Timing of hepatectomy for resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases: for whom simultaneous resection is more suitable—a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 9:e104348

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly ME, Spolverato G, Lê GN et al (2015) Synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: a network meta-analysis review comparing classical, combined, and liver-first surgical strategies: synchronous colorectal liver metastasis. J Surg Oncol 111:341–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muangkaew P, Cho JY, Han H-S et al (2015) Outcomes of simultaneous major liver resection and colorectal surgery for colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karoui M, Vigano L, Goyer P et al (2010) Combined first-stage hepatectomy and colorectal resection in a two-stage hepatectomy strategy for bilobar synchronous liver metastases. Br J Surg 97:1354–1362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayo SC, Pulitano C, Marques H et al (2013) Surgical management of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: a multicenter international analysis. J Am Coll Surg 216:707–716

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ejaz A, Semenov E, Spolverato G et al (2014) Synchronous primary colorectal and liver metastasis: impact of operative approach on clinical outcomes and hospital charges. HPB 16:1117–1126

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Croome KP, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Parker M et al (2015) Is the liver kinetic growth rate in ALPPS unprecedented when compared with PVE and living donor liver transplant? a multicentre analysis. HPB 17:477–484

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Schadde E, Ardiles V, Slankamenac K et al (2014) ALPPS offers a better chance of complete resection in patients with primarily unresectable liver tumors compared with conventional-staged hepatectomies: results of a multicenter analysis. World J Surg 38:1510–1519. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2513-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vauthey J-N, Abdalla EK, Doherty DA et al (2002) Body surface area and body weight predict total liver volume in Western adults. Liver Transplant Off Publ Am Assoc Study Liver Dis Int Liver Transplant Soc 8:233–240

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schadde E, Ardiles V, Robles-Campos R et al (2014) Early survival and safety of ALPPS: first report of the international ALPPS registry. Ann Surg 260:829–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schadde E, Raptis DA, Schnitzbauer AA et al (2015) Prediction of mortality after ALPPS stage-1: an analysis of 320 patients from the international ALPPS registry. Ann Surg 262:780–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O et al (2005) The “50–50 criteria” on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg 242:824–829

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 149:713–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rohatgi S, Harrison EM, Powell JJ et al (2015) ALPPS: adverse outcomes demand clear justification in an era of improving survival for colorectal liver metastases. World J Surg 39:1848–1849. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2726-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hasselgren K, Sandström P, Björnsson B (2015) Role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in colorectal liver metastases: a review. World J Gastroenterol 21:4491–4498

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Torres OJM, de SM Fernandes E, Oliveira CVC et al (2013) Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): the Brazilian experience. Arq Bras Cir Dig 26:40–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Li J, Girotti P, Königsrainer I et al (2013) ALPPS in right trisectionectomy: a safe procedure to avoid postoperative liver failure? J Gastrointest Surg 17:956–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bertens KA, Hawel J, Lung K et al (2015) ALPPS: challenging the concept of unresectability—a systematic review. Int J Surg 13:280–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Adam R, Pascal G, Castaing D et al (2004) Tumor progression while on chemotherapy: a contraindication to liver resection for multiple colorectal metastases? Ann Surg 240:1052–1064

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Sayra Cristancho and the Center for Education Research and Innovation (CERI) at Western University for their expertise and support in the process of writing this study for publication. We are grateful to the administrators and contributors of the International ALPPS Registry for providing the data. We also thank Dr. Kelly Vogt from the Department of Surgery at London Health Sciences Center for her support in the design and statistical analysis of our study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wanis, K.N., Buac, S., Linecker, M. et al. Patient Survival After Simultaneous ALPPS and Colorectal Resection. World J Surg 41, 1119–1125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3818-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3818-1

Keywords

Navigation