Abstract
The aim was to construct and validate a cost-efficient index to measure GHG emissions (GHGe) caused by Danish consumers’ diets to be employed in questionnaire-based surveys. The index was modelled on the basis of actual food purchase data from a panel of ordinary Danish households and a questionnaire consisting of food frequency questions issued to the same panel. Based on the purchase data, diet-related GHGe were calculated for 2012. The data was then split into a learning sample and a validation sample. The index was constructed using the learning sample where a scoring procedure was calculated from responses to the questionnaire-based food frequency questions that predicted diet-related GHGe. Subsequently, the index scoring procedure was employed on the validation sample and the empirical relevance of the index was examined. In the learning sample, a scoring procedure to construct the index was developed on basis of 13 food frequency questions. In the validation sample, the index accounted for considerable variation in diet-related GHGe. Furthermore, the index was associated with the same socio-demographic and attitudinal factors as identified with calculated diet-related GHGe using food purchase data. Surprisingly, in this analysis, people’s sense of obligation to do something about global warming did not lead to decreased GHGe. Higher social status and gastronomic interest, meanwhile, led to increased GHGe. The index can be used in future questionnaire surveys as a cost-efficient way to estimate diet-related GHG emissions of Danish consumers. Since the index is responsive to relevant socio-demographic and attitudinal factors, it can be utilised to monitor key attitudinal/habitual and socio-demographic drivers of change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Audsley E, Brander M, Chatterton J, Murphy-Bokern D, Webster C, Williams A (2009) How low can we go? An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the UK food system and the scope to reduce them by 2050. Food Climate Research Network & WWF, London, UK
Baroni L, Cenci L, Tettamanti M, Berati M (2007) Evaluating the environmental impacts of various dietary patterns combined with different food production systems. Eur J Clin Nutr 61:279–286
Berners-Lee C, Hoolohan H, Cammack CN, Hewitt M (2012) The relative greenhouse gas impacts of realistic dietary choices. Energy Policy 43:184–190
Biltoft-Jensen A, Matthiessen J, Rasmussen LB, Fagt S, Groth MV, Hels O (2009) Validation of the Danish 7-day pre-coded food diary among adults: energy intake v. energy expenditure and recording length. Br J Nutr 102:1838–46
Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction. A social critique of the judgment of taste. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Byrkjeflot H, Pedersen JS, Svejenova S (2013) From label to practice: the process of creating new Nordic cuisine. J Food Sci Technol 11:36–55
Carlsson-Kanyama A, Gonzalez AD (2009) Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. Am J Clin Nutr 89:1704S–1709S
Daly A, Pollard CM, Kerr DA, Binns CW, Phillips M (2015) Using short dietary questions to develop indicators of dietary behaviour for use in surveys exploring attitudinal and/or behavioural aspects of dietary choices. Nutrients 7:6330–6345
Fagt S, Biltot-Jensen A, Mathiessen J, Groth MG, Christensen T, Trolle E (2008) Danskernes kostvaner 1995-2006. Status og udvikling med fokus på frugt og grønt samt sukker. DTU Fødevareinstituttet, Søborg, Denmark
Freisling H, Elmadfa I, Schuh W, Wagner KH (2009) Development and validation of a food frequency index using nutritional biomarkers in a sample of middle-aged and older adults. J Hum Nutr Diet 22:29–39
Garnett T (2008) Cooking up a storm. Food, greenhouse gas emissions and our changing climate. Food Climate Research Network. Guildford, UK
Holm L, Lund TB, Niva M (2015) Eating practices and diet quality: a population study of four Nordic countries. Eur J Clin Nutr 69:791–798
Irz X, Kurrpa S (2013). Inter-household variations in environmental impact of food consumption in Finland. MTT Discussion Papers 1. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/152215/2/DP2013_1.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2016
LCA Food Database (2004). http://www.lcafood.dk. Accessed 4 January 2016
Macdiarmid J, Kyle J, Horgan G, Loe J, Fyfe C, Johnstone A, McNeill G (2012) Sustainable diets for the future: can we contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by eating a healthy diet? Am J Clin Nutr 96:632–639
Massari M, Freeman KM, Seccareccia F, Menotti A, Farchi G (2004) An index to measure the association between dietary patterns and coronary heart disease risk factors: findings from two Italian studies. Prev Med 39:841–847
OECD (2009) What are equivalence scales? OECD, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/eco/growth/OECD-Note-EquivalenceScales.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2016
Pot GK, Richards M, Prynne CJ, Stephen AM (2014) Development of the eating choices index (eci): a four-item index to measure healthiness of diet. Public Health Nutr 17:2660–2666
Quested T, Ingles R, Parry A (2013) Household food and drink waste in the United Kingdom 2012. WRAP Final Report
Reynolds CJ, Buckley JD, Weinstein P, Boland J (2014) Are the dietary guidelines for meat, fat, fruit and vegetable consumption appropriate for environmental sustainability? A review of the literature. Nutrients 6:2251–2265
Reynolds CJ, Piantadosi J, Buckley JD, Weinstein P, Boland J (2015) Evaluation of the environmental impact of weekly food consumption in different socio-economic households in Australia using environmentally extended input–output analysis. Ecol Econ 111:58–64
Risku-Norja H, Kurppa S, Helenius J (2009) Impact of consumers’ diet choices on greenhouse gas emissions. In: Koskela J, Vinnari M (eds) Future of the Consumer Society. Tampere, Finland
Saxe H, Larsen TM, Mogensen L (2013) The global warming potential of two healthy Nordic diets compared with the average Danish diet. Clim Change 116:249–262
Scarborough P, Appleby PN, Mizdrak A, Briggs AD, Travis RC, Bradbury KE, Key TJ (2014) Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK. Clim Change 125:179–192
Soret S, Mejia A, Batech M, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Harwatt H, Sabaté J (2014) Climate change mitigation and health effects of varied dietary patterns in real-life settings throughout North America. Am J Clin Nutr 100(suppl):490S–5S
Stern P (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. J Soc Issues 56:407–424
Toft U, Kristoffersen L, Lau C, Borch-Johnsen K, Jorgensen T (2007a) The Dietary Quality Score: validation and association with cardiovascular risk factors: the Inter99 study. Eur J Clin Nutr 61:270–278
Toft U, Kristoffersen L, Ladelund S et al. (2007b) Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire used in the Inter99 stud. Eur J Clin Nutr 62:1038–46
Vad Mathiesen B, Lund H, Karlsson K (2009) IDAs KlimaPlan 2050—future climate engineering solutions. Ingeniørforeningen, København, http://ida.dk/sites/prod.ida.dk/files/Baggrundsrapport%20-%20IDAs%20klimaplan.pdf. Accessed 4 January 2016
Vieux F, Darmon N, Touazi D, Soler LG (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions of self-selected individual diets in France: changing the diet structure or consuming less? Ecol Econ 75:91–10
Vieux, F, Soler, L G, Touazi, D, Darmon, N (2013). High nutritional quality is not associated with low greenhouse gas emissions in self-selected diets of French adults. Am J Clin Nutr. doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.035105
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Danish Strategic Research Council (grant no. 0603-00450B).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 101 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lund, T.B., Watson, D., Smed, S. et al. The Diet-related GHG Index: construction and validation of a brief questionnaire-based index. Climatic Change 140, 503–517 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1869-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1869-9