Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Promoting Early, Safe Return to Work in Injured Employees: A Randomized Trial of a Supervisor Training Intervention in a Healthcare Setting

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose Supervisors in the healthcare sector have the potential to contribute to disability prevention in injured employees. Published data on the evaluation of return to work (RTW) interventions aimed at direct supervisors are scarce. We sought to determine the effect of a brief audiovisual supervisor training module on supervisor RTW attitudes and knowledge. Methods A parallel-group study, using equal randomization, comparing the training module intervention to usual practice in healthcare supervisors at a quaternary care hospital was conducted. Differences between groups in changes in RTW attitude and knowledge survey question scores between baseline and 3 months were assessed using the Mann–Whitney U test. The Benjamini–Hochberg–Yekutieli procedure was used to control for false discovery rate and generate adjusted p values. Results Forty supervisors were allocated to the intervention group and 41 to the usual practice group. Attitude and knowledge scores for most questions improved between baseline and immediately after intervention administration. Comparing intervention (n = 33) and usual practice groups (n = 37), there was a trend toward greater increase between baseline and 3 months follow-up in agreement that the supervisor can manage the RTW process (U = 515, adjusted p value = 0.074) and in confidence that the supervisor can answer employees’ questions (U = 514, adjusted p value = 0.074) in the intervention group, although these findings were not statistically significant. Conclusions The training intervention may have provided the initial tools for supervisors to navigate the RTW process in collaboration with others in the RTW community of practice. A larger study with longer follow-up is needed to confirm results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gates LB. The role of the supervisor in successful adjustment to work with a disabling condition: issues for disability policy and practice. J Occup Rehabil. 1993;3:179–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Woods V. Work-related musculoskeletal health and social support. Occup Med. 2005;55:177–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashemi L, Webster BS, Clancy EA, Courtney TK. Length of disability and cost of work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity. J Occup Environ Med. 1998;40:261–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McLellan RK, Pransky G, Shaw WS. Disability management training for supervisors: a pilot intervention program. J Occup Rehabil. 2001;11:33–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Akabus S, Gates L. Disability management: labor management initiatives in early intervention, final report. New York: Center for Social Policy and Practice in the Workplace, Columbia University School of Social Work; 1991.

  6. Holmgren K, Ivanoff SD. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17:93–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Incidence rates of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by case type and ownership, selected industries, 2014 [Internet]. United States Department of Labor; 2015 [cited 2015 August 5]. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/osh.t01.htm.

  8. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2014 [Internet]. United States Department of Labor; 2015 [cited 2015 August 5]. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh2.pdf.

  9. Revised Code of Washington. Chapter 15.12: Employments and Occupations Covered [Internet]. Washington State Legislature; 2011 [cited 2015 August 5]. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=51.12.

  10. Silverstein B, Adams B. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, back, and upper extremity in Washington State, 1997–2005. Technical Report Number 40-11-2007. Washington: Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention Program, Washington State Department of Labor and Industries; 2007.

  11. Pransky G, Shaw W, McLellan R. Employer attitudes, training, and return-to-work outcomes: a pilot study. Assist Technol. 2001;13:131–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wickizer TM, Franklin G, Plaeger-Brockway R, Mootz R, Drylie D. Improving the quality of occupational health care in Washington State: new approaches to designing community-based health care systems. J Ambul Care Manag. 2002;25:43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wickizer TM, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Gluck J, Mootz R, Smith-Weller T, et al. Improving quality, preventing disability and reducing costs in workers’ compensation healthcare: a population-based intervention study. Med Care. 2011;49:1105–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Centers of Occupational Health & Education (COHE) [Internet]. Washington Department of Labor and Industries; 2016 [cited 2016 February 12]. http://www.lni.wa.gov/CLAIMSINS/PROVIDERS/PROJRESEARCHCOMM/OHS/DEFAULT.ASP.

  15. Stay at Work [Internet]. Washington Department of Labor and Industries; 2016 [cited 2016 February 12]. http://www.lni.wa.gov/main/stayatwork/.

  16. Bandura A. Organizational applications of social cognitive theory. Aust J Manag. 1988;13:275–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chowdhury MS. Human behavior in the context of training: an overview of the role of learning theories as applied to training and development. J Knowl Manag Pract. 2006;7(2):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Catalyst [Internet]. University of Washington; 2016 [cited 2016 February 12]. https://catalyst.uw.edu/.

  19. Safety & Health Investment Projects (SHIP) Grants Program [Internet]. Washington Department of Labor and Industries; 2016 [cited 2016 February 12]. http://www.lni.wa.gov/safety/GrantsPartnerships/SHIP/awardees/UWHarborview/DevelopingERTWTraining.asp.

  20. Haahr M, Haahr S. Random.org [Internet]. Random.org; 2016 [cited 2016 February 12]. https://www.random.org/.

  21. University of Washington Claim Services. Injured at work? A workers’ compensation guide for all university personnel [Internet]. University of Washington; 2016 [cited 2016 February 12]. http://risk.uw.edu/sites/default/files/WCBrochure.pdf.

  22. State Fund financial information [Internet]. Washington Department of Labor and Industries; 2016 [cited 2016 February 12]. http://www.lni.wa.gov/ClaimsIns/Insurance/Learn/StateFund/Default.asp.

  23. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat. 2001;29:1165–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. R Found Stat Comput; 2011 [cited 2015 Aug 28]. http://www.r-project.org.

  25. Collins A, Halverson R. Rethinking education in the age of technology: the digital revolution and schooling in America. 1st ed. New York: Teachers College Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Turner JA, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Sheppard L, Stover B, Wu R, et al. Early predictors of chronic work disability: a prospective, population-based study of workers with back injuries. Spine. 2008;33:2809–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Turner JA, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Sheppard L, Wickizer TM, Wu R, et al. Early predictors of chronic work disability associated with carpal tunnel syndrome: a longitudinal workers’ compensation cohort study. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50:489–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rogelberg SG, Stanton JM. Introduction: understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organ Res Methods. 2007;10:195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Michael Oberg, Lisa Hart, Jennifer Krenz, Shari Spung, Pam Nathan, Linda Chihara, Wendy Winslow-Nason, Elena Williams, Paula Minton-Foltz, Elise Chayet, Pam Jorgenson, Pranika Laing, Julie Newnam, Lynn Diaz, Kathy Maher, and Jon Reynolds for their contributions. This work is dedicated to Jon Reynolds (1968–2015).

Funding Source

Funding and support for this project has been provided by the State of Washington, Department of Labor and Industries, Safety and Health Investment Projects (Grant Number 2012RH00198).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to June T. Spector.

Additional information

June T. Spector and Nicholas K. Reul have contributed equally.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 87 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spector, J.T., Reul, N.K. Promoting Early, Safe Return to Work in Injured Employees: A Randomized Trial of a Supervisor Training Intervention in a Healthcare Setting. J Occup Rehabil 27, 70–81 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9633-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9633-6

Keywords

Navigation