Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cost evaluation of cellulase enzyme for industrial-scale cellulosic ethanol production based on rigorous Aspen Plus modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cost reduction on cellulase enzyme usage has been the central effort in the commercialization of fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose biomass. Therefore, establishing an accurate evaluation method on cellulase enzyme cost is crucially important to support the health development of the future biorefinery industry. Currently, the cellulase cost evaluation methods were complicated and various controversial or even conflict results were presented. To give a reliable evaluation on this important topic, a rigorous analysis based on the Aspen Plus flowsheet simulation in the commercial scale ethanol plant was proposed in this study. The minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) was used as the indicator to show the impacts of varying enzyme supply modes, enzyme prices, process parameters, as well as enzyme loading on the enzyme cost. The results reveal that the enzyme cost drives the cellulosic ethanol price below the minimum profit point when the enzyme is purchased from the current industrial enzyme market. An innovative production of cellulase enzyme such as on-site enzyme production should be explored and tested in the industrial scale to yield an economically sound enzyme supply for the future cellulosic ethanol production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klein-Marcuschamer D, Oleskowicz-Popiel P, Simmons BA, Blanch HW (2012) The challenge of enzyme cost in the production of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:1083–1087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chovau S, Degrauwe D, Bruggen BV (2013) Critical analysis of techno-economic estimates for the production cost of lignocellulosic bio-ethanol. Renew Sust Energ Rev 26:307–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Geddes CC, Nieves IU, Ingram LO (2011) Advances in ethanol production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 22:312–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sassner P, Galbe M, Zacchi G (2008) Techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from three different lignocellulosic materials. Biomass Bioenerg 32:422–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, Jechura J, Neeves K, Sheehan J, Wallace B (2002) Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wingren A, Galbe M, Roslander C, Rudolf A, Zacchi G (2005) Effect of reduction in yeast and enzyme concentrations in a simultaneous-saccharification-and-fermentation-based bioethanol process: technical and economic evaluation. Appl Biochem Biotech 122:485–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kazi FK, Fortman J, Anex R, Kothandaraman G, Hsu D, Aden A, Dutta A (2010) Techno-economic analysis of biochemical scenarios for production of cellulosic ethanol. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Phitsuwan P, Laohakunjit N, Kerdchoechuen O, Kyu KL, Ratanakanokchai K (2013) Present and potential applications of cellulases in agriculture, biotechnology, and bioenergy. Folia Microbiol 58:163–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Merino ST, Cherry J (2007) Progress and challenges in enzyme development for biomass utilization. Adv Biochem Engin Biotechnol 108:95–120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong Y, Nizami AS, Pourbafrani M, Saville BA, MacLean HL (2013) Impact of cellulase production on environmental and financial metrics for lignocellulosic ethanol. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 7:303–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Takimura O, Yanagida T, Fujimoto S, Minowa T (2013) Estimation of bioethanol production cost from rice straw by on-site enzyme production. J JPA Petrol Inst 56:150–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Humbird D, David R, Tao L, Kinchin C, Hsu D, Aden A (2011) Process design and economics for biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol: dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Wooley R, Putsche V (1996) Development of an ASPEN PLUS physical property database for biofuels components. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Fang ZH, Zhang J, Lu QM, Bao J (2013) Process development of short-chain polyols synthesis from corn stover by combination of enzymatic hydrolysis and catalytic hydrogenolysis. Biotechnol Rep 3:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kovacs K, Szakacs G, Zacchi G (2009) Comparative enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated spruce by supernatants, whole fermentation broths and washed mycelia of Trichoderma reesei and Trichoderma atroviride. Bioresour Technol 100:1350–1357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Deanda K, Zhang M, Eddy C, Picataggio S (1996) Development of an arabinose-fermenting Zymomonas mobilis strain by metabolic pathway engineering. Appl Environ Microb 62:4465–4470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rudolf A, Baudel H, Zacchi G, Hahn-Hagerdal B (2007) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated bagasse using Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB3400 and Pichia stipitis CBS6054. Biotechnol Bioeng 99:783–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wyman CE, Spindler DD, Grohmann K (1992) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of several lignocellulosic feedstocks to fuel ethanol. Biomass Bioenerg 3:301–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Olofsson K, Bertilsson M, Liden G (2008) A short review on SSF—an interesting process option for ethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Biotechnol Biofuels 1:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar L, Arantes V, Chandra R, Saddler J (2012) The lignin present in steam pretreated softwood binds enzymes and limits cellulose accessibility. Bioresour Technol 103:201–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schubert C (2006) Can biofuels finally take center stage? Nat Biotechnol 24:777–784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National High-Tech Program of China (2012AA022301, 2014AA021901) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (21306048).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China

    Gang Liu, Jian Zhang & Jie Bao

Authors
  1. Gang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jie Bao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Bao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, G., Zhang, J. & Bao, J. Cost evaluation of cellulase enzyme for industrial-scale cellulosic ethanol production based on rigorous Aspen Plus modeling. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39, 133–140 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1497-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1497-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation