skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858113acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
note

Destructive Games: Creating Value by Destroying Valuable Physical Objects

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

While personal fabrication tools, such as laser cutters and milling machines, are intended for construction, we are exploring their use for destruction. We present a series of games that result in valuable physical objects being destroyed objects owned by the players. Interestingly, we found that we can design these games to be desirable to play, despite the loss of the object, by instead producing social value. As part of a user study, twelve students played a destructive game in which a laser cutter cut up their own money bills. Surprisingly, 8 out of 12 participants would play again. They shared their post-game stories with us.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn0480-file3.mp4

mp4

56.2 MB

References

  1. Eric P.S. Baumer and M. Six Silberman. 2011. When the implication is not to design (technology). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 2271--2274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. DRM Chair, 2013. http://www.dvice.com/2013--32/heres-chair-destroys-itselfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Euro Destruction. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ.do?uri= CELEX:32010H0191:EU:HTMLGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tanja Döring, Axel Sylvester, and Albrecht Schmidt. A design space for ephemeral user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '13), 75--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Marco Evaristti. Helena. 2000. www.evaristti.com/marco/Mine_album/Pages/Helena.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tony Fry. Design futuring: sustainability, ethics, and new practice. Berg. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Zach Gage. Lose/Lose. 2009. www.stfj.net/index2.php?project=art/2009/loseloseGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ken Goldberg, Eric Paulos, John Canny, Judith Donath, and Mark Pauline. Legal tender. In ACM SIGGRAPH 96 Visual Proceedings: The art and interdisciplinary programs of SIGGRAPH '96 (SIGGRAPH '96), 43--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gustav Metzger. Machine, Auto-Creative and AutoDestructive Art. In Proceedings of Journal Ark. 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Stefanie Mueller, Pedro Lopes, and Patrick Baudisch. 2012. Interactive construction: interactive fabrication of functional mechanical devices. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '12), 599--606. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. One Single Life. FreshTone Games. 2009. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VQzMjckfAkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2014. Counterfunctional things: exploring possibilities in designing digital limitations. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS '14), USA, 375--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Tilman Reiff, Volker Morawe. PainStation. 2001. http://www.painstation.deGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Julia Ringler and Holger Reckter. 2012. DESU 100: about the temptation to destroy a robot. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '12), 151--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Harvey Sacks. Lectures on Conversation: Volumes I and II. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Social Roulette, www.socialroulette.netGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nurit Tal-Or. 2010. Bragging in the right context: Impressions formed of self-promoters who create a context for their boasts. Social Influences 5, 1, 2010, 23--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Katie Salen. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals. The MIT Press. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. The Big Deal. Fox, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Trashed TV show. MTV, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. José P. Zagal, Staffan Björk, and Chris Lewis. Dark Patterns in the Design of Games. In: Foundations of Digital Games, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. John Zimmerman. 2009. Designing for the self: making products that help people become the person they desire to be. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), 395404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Destructive Games: Creating Value by Destroying Valuable Physical Objects

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • note

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader