Karen Spektor-Precel
ABSTRACT
A new theoretical scheme named ToAM (Theory of Artificial Mind) was examined by means of qualitative and quantitative methodology among twenty four 5-7 year old children from centr al Israel. The study also examined the effects of interacting with behaving artifacts (constructing versus observing the robot's behavior) using the "RoboGan" interface on children's development of ToAM and ToM and looked for conceptions that evolve among children while interacting with behaving artifacts which are indicative of the acquisition of ToAM. The quantitative analysis indicated that the interaction with behaving artifacts, for both age and condition groups brought into awareness children's ToM as well as influenced their ability to understand that robots can behave independently and based on external and environmental conditions. The qualitative analysis indicated that the engagement in building the robot's behavior influenced the constructors' ability to explain several of the robots' behaviors, their understanding of the robot's script-based behavior and rule-based behavior and the children's metacognitive development. The theoretical and practical importance of the study is discussed.
- Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 578--602.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computaional thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145--157. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burke Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14--26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caci, B., D'amico, A. & Chiazzese, G. (2012). Robotics and virtual worlds: an experiential learning llab. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 196, 83--87.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58, 5 (Whole No. 270).Google ScholarCross Ref
- German, T. P. & Defeyter, M. A. (2000). Immunity to functional fixedness in young chidren. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(4), 707--7112.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Granott, N. (1991). Puzzled minds and weird creatures: Phases in the spontaneous process of knowledge construction. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.) Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Kaufman, A. S. & Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC). Pearson Assessments, Bloomington, MN.Google Scholar
- Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, A. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 245--255.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z., & Arami, M. (2002). The effects of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical authentic tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), 225--250.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Levy, S. T., & Mioduser, D. (2008). Does it "want" or "was it programmed to..."? Kindergarten children's explanations of an autonomous robots' adaptive functioning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 337--359.Google Scholar
- Matan, A., & Carey, S. (2001). Developmental changes within the core of artifact concepts. Cognition, 78, 1--26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mioduser, D., & Kuperman, A. (2012). Kindergarten children's perceptions of "Anthropomorphic Artifacts" with adaptive behavior. Proceedings of the Chais conference on instructional technologies research 2012: Learning in the Technological era. Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, S. Eden., N. Geri., Y. Yair, Y. Kalma. (Eds.), Raanana: The Open University of Israel.Google Scholar
- Mioduser, D., & Levy, S. T. (2010). Making sense by building sense: Kindergarten children's construction and understanding of adaptive robot behavior. International Journal of Computers in Mathematical learning, 15, 99--127.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mioduser, D., Levy, S. T., & Talis, V. (2009). Episodes to Scripts to Rules: Concrete-abstractions in kindergarten children's explanations of a robot's behavior. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 15--36.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers and powerful Ideas. NY: Harvester Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Perner J., & Wimmer, H. (1985). John thinks that Mary thinks that: attribution of second order beliefs by 5-year-old to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 437--71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peyser, M., Shimborsky, G., Wolf, N., & Hazany, I. (1996). Kaufman assessment battery for children: Israeli version. Jerusalem: Ministry of education, culture and sports - psychological and counseling services, the Henrietta Szold institute for research in behavioral sciences.Google Scholar
- Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a 'theory of mind'? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515--526.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Resnick, M. (1998). Technologies for Lifelong Kindergarten. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(4), 43--55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sammeroff, A, & Haith, M. (1996). The five to seven year shift. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Siegler, R. S. & Chen, Z. (1998). Developmental differences in rule learning: A microgenetic analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 273--310.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Talis, V., Levy, S. T. & Mioduser, D. (1998). RoboGAN: Interface for programming a robot with rules for young children. Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar
- Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103--128.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The influence of constructing robot's behavior on the development of theory of mind (ToM) and theory of artificial mind (ToAM) in young children
Recommendations
Designing software for young children: theoretically grounded guidelines
IDC '04: Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a communityThis poster describes a research project aiming to formulate a set of guidelines for designing software for children aged five to six. The primary research method is a comprehensive literature study that will cover two research disciplines, namely ...
Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism
HRI '08: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interactionThis study investigated whether a robotic dog might aid in the social development of children with autism. Eleven children diagnosed with autism (ages 5-8) interacted with the robotic dog AIBO and, during a different period within the same experimental ...
Comments