Skip to main content
Log in

Antihypertensive Therapy and the J-curve: Fact or Fiction?

  • Antihypertensive Agents: Mechanisms of Drug Action (ME Ernst, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Hypertension Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite more than five decades of hypertension treatment, there still exist both a lack of evidence and a clear consensus to answer a fundamental question: What is the optimal blood pressure target in patients with hypertension? Early epidemiologic studies suggested the notion of the lower the blood pressure, the better the outcomes; however, others have demonstrated a J-curve phenomenon with worse outcomes at both low and very high blood pressures. Although the existence of such a J-curve remains a topic of debate, there is now increasing recognition of target organ heterogeneity wherein the optimal blood pressure depends on the target organ in question. For cardiac protection, the current body of evidence does not support a systolic blood pressure goal of lower than 130–140 mmHg. For cerebrovascular protection, however, lower blood pressure seems to be better with a sustained reduction in events down to a systolic blood pressure of 110–120 mmHg. The J-curve phenomenon is therefore both fact and fiction based on the target organ in question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005;365(9455):217–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ, Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet. 2002;360(9343):1347–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo Jr JL, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2007;25(6):1105–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moser M. From JNC I to JNC 7—what have we learned? Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2006;48(5):303–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. A cooperative study. JAMA. 1977;237(3):255–61

  7. Jackson JH, Sobolski J, Krienke R, Wong KS, Frech-Tamas F, Nightengale B. Blood pressure control and pharmacotherapy patterns in the United States before and after the release of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) guidelines. J Am Board Family Med. 2008;21(6):512–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. The 1984 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1984;144(5):1045–57

  9. The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1988;148(5):1023–38

  10. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1997;157(21):2413–46

  11. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R, Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360(9349):1903–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Adler AI, Stratton IM, Neil HA, Yudkin JS, Matthews DR, Cull CA, et al. Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321(7258):412–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, Dahlof B, Elmfeldt D, Julius S, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group. Lancet. 1998;351(9118):1755–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cruickshank JM. Antihypertensive treatment and the J-curve. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther/Sponsored Int Soc Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2000;14(4):373–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arima H, Chalmers J, Woodward M, Anderson C, Rodgers A, Davis S, et al. Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial. J Hypertens. 2006;24(6):1201–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stewart IM. Long-term observations on high blood-pressure presenting in fit young men. Lancet. 1971;1(7695):355–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stewart IM. Letter: hypertension and myocardial infarction. Br Med J. 1974;3(5925):251.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart IM. Relation of reduction in pressure to first myocardial infarction in patients receiving treatment for severe hypertension. Lancet. 1979;1(8121):861–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cruickshank JM, Thorp JM, Zacharias FJ. Benefits and potential harm of lowering high blood pressure. Lancet. 1987;1(8533):581–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB, Cruickshank JM. Relation of low diastolic blood pressure to coronary heart disease death in presence of myocardial infarction: the Framingham Study. BMJ. 1991;303(6799):385–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Messerli FH, Mancia G, Conti CR, Hewkin AC, Kupfer S, Champion A, et al. Dogma disputed: can aggressively lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease be dangerous? Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(12):884–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sleight P, Redon J, Verdecchia P, Mancia G, Gao P, Fagard R, et al. Prognostic value of blood pressure in patients with high vascular risk in the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial study. J Hypertens. 2009;27(7):1360–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bangalore S, Qin J, Sloan S, Murphy SA, Cannon CP, Investigators PI-TT. What is the optimal blood pressure in patients after acute coronary syndromes?: Relationship of blood pressure and cardiovascular events in the PRavastatin OR atorVastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (PROVE IT-TIMI) 22 trial. Circulation. 2010;122(21):2142–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bangalore S, Messerli FH, Wun CC, Zuckerman AL, DeMicco D, Kostis JB, et al. J-curve revisited: an analysis of blood pressure and cardiovascular events in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(23):2897–908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Haller H, Ito S, Izzo Jr JL, Januszewicz A, Katayama S, Menne J, et al. Olmesartan for the delay or prevention of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(10):907–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weber MA, Bakris GL, Hester A, Weir MR, Hua TA, Zappe D, et al. Systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes during treatment of hypertension. Am J Med. 2013;126(6):501–8. A pre-specified analysis of the large randomized ACCOMPLISH trial of hypertensives with either known CAD or at high risk for cardiovascular events demonstrated a J-curve relationship between on-treatment SBP and cardiovascular events, but a linear relationship for stroke where lower SBP was better.

  27. Ovbiagele B, Diener HC, Yusuf S, Martin RH, Cotton D, Vinisko R, et al. Level of systolic blood pressure within the normal range and risk of recurrent stroke. JAMA. 2011;306(19):2137–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Group AS, Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP, Goff Jr DC, Grimm Jr RH, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1575–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bangalore S, Kumar S, Lobach I, Messerli FH. Blood pressure targets in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus/impaired fasting glucose: observations from traditional and Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses of randomized trials. Circulation. 2011;123(24):2799–810. 9 p following 810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bangalore S, Kumar S, Volodarskiy A, Messerli FH. Blood pressure targets in patients with coronary artery disease: observations from traditional and Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of randomised trials. Heart. 2013;99(9):601–13. A large meta-analysis of 15 randomized clinical trials and 66,504 individuals with CAD found lower rates of stroke in those with an on-treatment SBP of ≤135 mmHg, but no cardiovascular benefit.

  31. Dorresteijn JA, van der Graaf Y, Spiering W, Grobbee DE, Bots ML, Visseren FL, et al. Relation between blood pressure and vascular events and mortality in patients with manifest vascular disease: J-curve revisited. Hypertension. 2012;59(1):14–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Protogerou AD, Safar ME, Iaria P, Safar H, Le Dudal K, Filipovsky J, et al. Diastolic blood pressure and mortality in the elderly with cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. 2007;50(1):172–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Anderson RJ, Bahn GD, Moritz TE, Kaufman D, Abraira C, Duckworth W, et al. Blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(1):34–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Greenberg JA. Hypothesis—the J-shaped follow-up relation between mortality risk and disease risk-factor is due to statistical confounding. Med Hypotheses. 2002;59(5):568–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. The fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V). Archives of Internal Medicine. 1993;153(2):154–83.

  36. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, et al. 2014 Evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311(5):507–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Bohm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2013;31(7):1281–357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension: clinical management of primary hypertension in adults. NICE guidelines [CG127]. 2011 [June 20, 2014]. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg127.

  39. Summary of recommendation statements. Kidney international supplements. 2012;2(5):341–2.

  40. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37 Suppl 1:S14–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2012;126(25):e354–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, Graham I, Reiner Z, Verschuren M, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J. 2012;33(13):1635–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(3):e28–e292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE, Staessen JA, Liu L, Dumitrascu D, et al. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(18):1887–98.

  45. Denardo SJ, Gong Y, Nichols WW, Messerli FH, Bavry AA, Cooper-Dehoff RM, et al. Blood pressure and outcomes in very old hypertensive coronary artery disease patients: an INVEST substudy. Am J Med. 2010;123(8):719–26.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Group JS. Principal results of the Japanese trial to assess optimal systolic blood pressure in elderly hypertensive patients (JATOS). Hypertens Res. 2008;31(12):2115–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ogihara T, Saruta T, Rakugi H, Matsuoka H, Shimamoto K, Shimada K, et al. Target blood pressure for treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly: valsartan in elderly isolated systolic hypertension study. Hypertension. 2010;56(2):196–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bangalore S, Gong Y, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Pepine CJ, Messerli FH. 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee Panel Recommendation for Blood Pressure Targets Revisited: results from the INVEST Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(8):784–93. A post hoc analysis of the INVEST trial showed increased cardiovascular mortality and stroke with an on-treatment SBP of 140–149 mmHg compared to <140 mmHg in those aged ≥60 years with CAD, suggesting that the most recent guideline recommendation of a target BP of <150/90 mmHg in this age group may not be optimal in those with concurrent CAD.

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Monique S. Tanna declares no conflicts of interest.

Sripal Bangalore reports grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular and personal fees from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Gilead, and Merck.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sripal Bangalore.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Antihypertensive Agents: Mechanisms of Drug Action

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanna, M.S., Bangalore, S. Antihypertensive Therapy and the J-curve: Fact or Fiction?. Curr Hypertens Rep 17, 6 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-014-0516-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-014-0516-y

Keywords

Navigation