Abstract
In order to drive optimal living and sustainable consumption in the built and natural environment, there is the need to develop more sustainable, less energy-intensive systems and approaches that offer economic advantages, better operational performance, environmental merits and social acceptability. Measures to achieve these objectives including low-carbon technologies such as renewable energy generation technologies and energy efficiency measures are widely available today. Current focus on these technologies to reduce operational energy requirements has led to the neglect of embodied energy. This may result in obscuring the actual or net environmental gain for a given technology. Understanding the actual life cycle environmental gains is therefore necessary if a holistic effort in achieving sustainable built environment is to be attained. Furthermore, these environmental measures (operational and embodied) must be considered within an economic context. Against this backdrop, this chapter illustrates how policy instrument such as Marginal Abatement Cost Curve (MACC) can be used as a mechanism for evaluating low-carbon technologies taking into account both operational and embodied emissions and financial cost. The implication of emissions embodied in international trade flows within a MACC framework is also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
International Energy Agency [IEA]: World Energy Consumption by Sector. http://www.iea.org/stats/index.asp (2009). Accessed 26 Jan 2013
United States Green Building Council, [USGBC]: The LEED reference Guide for Green Building Design and Construction for the Design, Construction and Major Renovations of Commercial and Institutional Building (2009)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]: Working Group III – Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC Technical Chapter 9. http://report.mitigation2014.org/drafts/final-draft-postplenary/ipcc_wg3_ar5_final-draft_postplenary_chapter9_OnlinePDF.pdf (2014). Accessed 20 May 2014
IEA: CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion. Beyond 2020 Online Database, 138 pp. International Energy Agency, Paris (2012a). http://data.iea.org. Accessed 15 May 2014
UNEP: HFCs: A Critical Link in Protecting Climate and the Ozone Layer. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. 35 pp. http://www.unep.org/dewa/portals/67/pdf/HFC_report_OnlinePDF.pdf (2011a). Accessed 15 May 2014
EEA: Production, imports, exports and consumption of Fluorinated gases (F‐gases) for years 2007‐2011 in the EU‐27 (Mt CO2e, GWP TAR), European Environment Agency. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/production-imports-exports-and-consumption (2013). Accessed 15 May 2014
GEA Global Energy Assessment - Toward a Sustainable Future, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (2012)
US EPA: Overview of Greenhouse Gases. Emissions of Fluorinated Gases. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases/fgases.html (2013). Accessed 15 May 2014
United Nations Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003. United Nations; European Commission; International Monetary Fund; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; World Bank (2003)
Hertwich, E.G., Peter, G.P.: Multiregional Input-Output Database. One Planet Economy Network [OPEN] EU-Technical Document. http://www.oneplaneteconomynetwork.org/resources/programme-documents/WP1_MRIO_Technical_Document_OnlinePDF.pdf (2010). Accessed 20 Feb 2013
Copeland, B.R., Taylor, M.S.: Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2003)
Jayadevappa, R., Chhatre, S.: International trade and environmental quality: a survey. Ecol. Econ. 32, 175–194 (2000)
Barrett, J., Scott, K., Roelich, K., Peters, G., Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Le Quéré, C.: Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study. Climate Policy 13(4), 451–470 (2013)
Larsen, H.N., Hertwich, E.G.: The case for consumption-based accounting of greenhouse gas emissions to promote local climate action. Environ. Sci. Policy 12, 791–798 (2009)
Kanemoto, K., Moran, D., Lenzen, M., Geschke, A.: International trade undermines national emission reduction targets: new evidence from air pollution. Glob. Environ. Chang. 24, 52–59 (2014)
Acquaye, A.A., Duffy, A.P.: Input–output analysis of Irish construction sector greenhouse gas emissions. Build. Environ. 45, 784–791 (2010)
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., Minx, J., John, B.: Multiregional Input-Output Modelling Opens New Opportunities for the Estimation of Ecological Footprints Embedded in International Trade. International Ecological Footprint Conference, Cardiff, 8-10 May 2007 (2007)
Wiedmann, T., Wood, R., Minx, J.C., Lenzen, M., Guan, D., Harris, R.: A carbon footprint time series of the UK – results from a multi-region input–output model. Econ. Syst. Res. 22(1), 19–42 (2010)
Kanemoto, K., Lenzen, M., Peters, G.P., Moran, D.D., Geschke, A.: Frameworks for comparing emissions associated with production, consumption, and international trade. Environ. Sci. Tech. 46, 172–179 (2012)
Kanemoto, K., Lenzen, M., Geschke, A., Moran, D.: Building Eora: a global multi-region input output model at high country and sector. 19th International Input-Output Conference, Alexandria, USA, 13–17 June 2011 (2011)
Kesicki, F., Strachan, N.: Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves: confronting theory and practice. Environ. Sci. Policy 14, 1195–1204 (2011)
Kesicki, F.: What are the key drivers of MAC curves? A partial-equilibrium modelling approach for the UK? Energy Policy 58, 142–151 (2013)
Toke, D., Taylor, S.: Demand reduction in the UK-with a focus on the non-domestic sector. Energy Policy 35(4), 2131–2140 (2007)
Taylor, S.: The ranking of negative-cost emissions reduction measures. Energy Policy 48, 430–438 (2012)
Ibn-Mohammed, T., Greenough, R., Taylor, S., Ozawa-Meida, L., Acquaye, A.: Integrating economic considerations with operational and embodied emissions into a decision support system for the optimal ranking of non-domestic building retrofit options. Build. Environ. 72, 82–10 (2014)
Wiedmann, T., Wilting, H.C., Lenzen, M., Lutter, S., Palm, V.: Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input–output analysis. Ecol. Econ. 70(11), 1937–1945 (2011)
Building Regulations: Low or Zero Carbon Energy Sources: Strategic Guide. http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/br/BR_PDF_PTL_ZEROCARBONfinal_OnlinePDF.pdf (2006). Accessed 20 May 2012
RETScreen® International: Clean Energy Project Analysis: RETScreen® Engineering & Cases Textbook. 3rd edn. http://www.retscreen.net/download.php/ang/1016/0/Textbook_OnlinePDF.pdf (2005). Accessed 27 Oct 2013
London Renewables: Integrating renewable energy into new developments: toolkit for planners, developers and consultants (2004). ISBN 1 85261 660 1.
Peters, G.P. and Hertwich, E.G.: CO2 Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy. Environmental Science and Technology. 42(5), 1401–1407 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ibn-Mohammed, T., Acquaye, A., Greenough, R., Taylor, S., Ozawa-Meida, L. (2015). Using Policy Instruments to Drive Optimal Living and Sustainable Consumption in the Built and Natural Environment. In: Rassia, S., Pardalos, P. (eds) Future City Architecture for Optimal Living. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 102. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15030-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15030-7_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15029-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15030-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)