Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cost-Effectiveness of Chemoprevention with Proton Pump Inhibitors in Barrett’s Esophagus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may reduce the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. PPIs are prescribed for virtually all patients with Barrett’s esophagus, irrespective of the presence of reflux symptoms, and represent a de facto chemopreventive agent in this population. However, long-term PPI use has been associated with several adverse effects, and the cost-effectiveness of chemoprevention with PPIs has not been evaluated.

Aim

The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of PPIs for the prevention of EAC in Barrett’s esophagus without reflux.

Methods

We designed a state-transition Markov microsimulation model of a hypothetical cohort of 50-year-old white men with Barrett’s esophagus. We modeled chemoprevention with PPIs or no chemoprevention, with endoscopic surveillance for all treatment arms. Outcome measures were life-years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incident EAC cases and deaths, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

Results

Assuming 50 % reduction in EAC, chemoprevention with PPIs was a cost-effective strategy compared to no chemoprevention. In our model, administration of PPIs cost $23,000 per patient and resulted in a gain of 0.32 QALYs for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $12,000/QALY. In sensitivity analyses, PPIs would be cost-effective at $50,000/QALY if they reduce EAC risk by at least 19 %.

Conclusions

Chemoprevention with PPIs in patients with Barrett’s esophagus without reflux is cost-effective if PPIs reduce EAC by a minimum of 19 %. The identification of subgroups of Barrett’s esophagus patients at increased risk for progression would lead to more cost-effective strategies for the prevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown LM, Devesa SS, Chow WH. Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among white Americans by sex, stage, and age. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1184–1187.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrams JA, Sharaiha RZ, Gonsalves L, et al. Dating the rise of esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of Connecticut Tumor Registry data, 1940–2007. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:183–186.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wani S, Falk G, Hall M, et al. Patients with nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus have low risks for developing dysplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:220–227. (quiz e26).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hvid-Jensen F, Pedersen L, Drewes AM, et al. Incidence of adenocarcinoma among patients with Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1375–1383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhat S, Coleman HG, Yousef F, et al. Risk of malignant progression in Barrett’s esophagus patients: results from a large population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1049–1057.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shaheen NJ, Crosby MA, Bozymski EM, et al. Is there publication bias in the reporting of cancer risk in Barrett’s esophagus? Gastroenterology. 2000;119:333–338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang KK, Sampliner RE. Updated guidelines 2008 for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:788–797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Corley DA, Mehtani K, Quesenberry C, et al. Impact of endoscopic surveillance on mortality from Barrett’s esophagus-associated esophageal adenocarcinomas. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:312 e1–319 e1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Lindgren A, et al. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:825–831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jung KW, Talley NJ, Romero Y, et al. Epidemiology and natural history of intestinal metaplasia of the gastroesophageal junction and Barrett’s esophagus: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1447–1455. (quiz 1456).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hillman LC, Chiragakis L, Shadbolt B, et al. Effect of proton pump inhibitors on markers of risk for high-grade dysplasia and oesophageal cancer in Barrett’s oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27:321–326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Serag HB, Aguirre TV, Davis S, et al. Proton pump inhibitors are associated with reduced incidence of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1877–1883.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Jonge PJ, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, et al. Risk factors for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1421–1429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh S, Garg SK, Singh PP, et al. Acid-suppressive medications and risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2013. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305997.

  16. Spechler SJ. Barrett esophagus and risk of esophageal cancer: a clinical review. JAMA. 2013;310:627–636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nguyen DM, Richardson P, El-Serag HB. Medications (NSAIDs, statins, proton pump inhibitors) and the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2260–2266.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ, Thomson AB, Barkun AN, et al. The prevalence of Barrett’s oesophagus in a cohort of 1040 Canadian primary care patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia undergoing prompt endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:595–599.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Voutilainen M, Sipponen P, Mecklin JP, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: prevalence, clinical, endoscopic and histopathological findings in 1,128 consecutive patients referred for endoscopy due to dyspeptic and reflux symptoms. Digestion. 2000;61:6–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abrams JA, Fields S, Lightdale CJ, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus among patients who undergo upper endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:30–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ronkainen J, Aro P, Storskrubb T, et al. Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in the general population: an endoscopic study. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1825–1831.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rex DK, Cummings OW, Shaw M, et al. Screening for Barrett’s esophagus in colonoscopy patients with and without heartburn. Gastroenterology. 2003;125:1670–1677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peery AF, Hoppo T, Garman KS, et al. Feasibility, safety, acceptability, and yield of office-based, screening transnasal esophagoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:945–953.

  24. Kadri SR, Lao-Sirieix P, O’Donovan M, et al. Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett’s oesophagus in primary care: cohort study. BMJ. 2010;341:c4372.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang YX, Lewis JD, Epstein S, et al. Long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy and risk of hip fracture. JAMA. 2006;296:2947–2953.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dial S, Delaney JA, Barkun AN, et al. Use of gastric acid-suppressive agents and the risk of community-acquired Clostridium difficile-associated disease. JAMA. 2005;294:2989–2995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gray SL, LaCroix AZ, Larson J, et al. Proton pump inhibitor use, hip fracture, and change in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the Women’s Health Initiative. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:765–771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Corley DA, Kubo A, Zhao W, et al. Proton pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists are associated with hip fractures among at-risk patients. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:93–101.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Loo VG, Bourgault AM, Poirier L, et al. Host and pathogen factors for Clostridium difficile infection and colonization. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1693–1703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/postmarketdrugsafetyinformationforpatientsandproviders/ucm213206.htm. Accessed October 15, 2013.

  31. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/ucm290510.htm. Accessed October 15, 2013.

  32. Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, et al. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1084–1091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, et al. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:e18–e52. (quiz e13).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shaheen NJ, Sharma P, Overholt BF, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2277–2288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Streitz JM Jr, Andrews CW Jr, Ellis FH Jr. Endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus. Does it help? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:383–387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Corley DA, Levin TR, Habel LA, et al. Surveillance and survival in Barrett’s adenocarcinomas: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:633–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Khanna S, Pardi DS, Aronson SL, et al. The epidemiology of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:89–95.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chitnis AS, Holzbauer SM, Belflower RM, et al. Epidemiology of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection, 2009 through 2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1359–1367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. http://seer.cancer.gov/. Accessed October 15, 2013.

  40. Gold M. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Med Care. 1996;34:197–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Physician Fee Schedule Search. http://www.cms.gov/apps/physician-fee-schedule/. Accessed October 15, 2013.

  42. Physician Fee Schedule Look-up. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/. Accessed September 1, 2011.

  43. Roberts KJ, Harper E, Alderson D, et al. Long-term survival and cost analysis of an annual Barrett’s surveillance programme. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22:399–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu H, Michaud K, Nayak S, et al. The cost-effectiveness of therapy with teriparatide and alendronate in women with severe osteoporosis. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1209–1217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee BY, Popovich MJ, Tian Y, et al. The potential value of Clostridium difficile vaccine: an economic computer simulation model. Vaccine. 2010;28:5245–5253.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hunink M, Glasziou P. Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hur C, Nishioka NS, Gazelle GS. Cost-effectiveness of aspirin chemoprevention for Barrett’s esophagus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:316–325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Inadomi JM, Somsouk M, Madanick RD, et al. A cost-utility analysis of ablative therapy for Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:2101 e1-6–2114 e1-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Gordon LG, Mayne GC, Hirst NG, et al. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance of non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;79:242–256.

  50. Desai TK, Krishnan K, Samala N, et al. The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in non-dysplastic Barrett’s oesophagus: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2012;61:970–976.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kastelein F, Spaander MC, Steyerberg EW, et al. Proton pump inhibitors reduce the risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:382–388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Taylor JB, Rubenstein JH (2010) Meta-analyses of the effect of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux on the risk of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1729, 1730-7; quiz 1738.

  53. Laroui H, Dalmasso G, Nguyen HT, et al. Drug-loaded nanoparticles targeted to the colon with polysaccharide hydrogel reduce colitis in a mouse model. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:843e1-2–853e1-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chey WD, Inadomi JM, Booher AM, et al. Primary-care physicians’ perceptions and practices on the management of GERD: results of a national survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1237–1242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hillman LC, Chiragakis L, Shadbolt B, et al. Proton-pump inhibitor therapy and the development of dysplasia in patients with Barrett’s oesophagus. Med J Aust. 2004;180:387–391.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Fitzgerald RC, Omary MB, Triadafilopoulos G. Dynamic effects of acid on Barrett’s esophagus. An ex vivo proliferation and differentiation model. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:2120–2128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Souza RF, Shewmake K, Terada LS, et al. Acid exposure activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:299–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Souza RF, Shewmake K, Pearson S, et al. Acid increases proliferation via ERK and p38 MAPK-mediated increases in cyclooxygenase-2 in Barrett’s adenocarcinoma cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004;287:G743–G748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Drug Topics, 2001 Red Book. Montvale, NJ: PDR Network, LLC; 2001.

  60. Heath EI, Canto MI, Piantadosi S, et al. Secondary chemoprevention of Barrett’s esophagus with celecoxib: results of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:545–557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Abrams JA. Chemoprevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2008;1:7–18.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sinicrope FA, Broaddus R, Joshi N, et al. Evaluation of difluoromethylornithine for the chemoprevention of Barrett’s esophagus and mucosal dysplasia. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4:829–839.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Jankowski J, Moayyedi P. Re: cost-effectiveness of aspirin chemoprevention for Barrett’s esophagus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:885–887. (author reply 887).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kwok CS, Arthur AK, Anibueze CI, et al. Risk of Clostridium difficile infection with acid suppressing drugs and antibiotics: meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1011–1019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Janarthanan S, Ditah I, Adler DG, et al. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and proton pump inhibitor therapy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1001–1010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Targownik LE, Leslie WD, Davison KS, et al. The relationship between proton pump inhibitor use and longitudinal change in bone mineral density: a population-based study [corrected] from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1361–1369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Sonnenberg A, Fennerty MB. Medical decision analysis of chemoprevention against esophageal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1758–1766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Choi SE, Perzan K, Tramontano AC, et al. Statins and aspirin for chemoprevention in Barrett’s esophagus: results of a cost-effectiveness analysis. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2014;7:341–350.

  69. Hur C, Choi SE, Rubenstein JH, et al. The cost effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:567–575.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Sharaiha was supported by a training grant from the National Cancer Institute (T32 CA009529). Dr. Freedberg is supported in part by a training grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32 DK083256-04). Dr. Abrams was supported in part by a Career Development Award from the National Cancer Institute (K07 CA132892). This publication was also supported in part by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant Number UL1 RR024156.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reem Z. Sharaiha.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10620_2014_3186_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplemental Figure 1. Sensitivity analyses varying cost and risk reduction for chemoprevention with proton pump inhibitors, with no chemoprevention (surveillance only) compared to PPIs. The X-axis represents the  % EACs prevented by PPI therapy, and the Y-axis represents the cost ($/year) of PPIs. Figure 4A represents the analyses for WTP $50,000, whereas Figure 4B represents WTP $100,000. (TIFF 184 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharaiha, R.Z., Freedberg, D.E., Abrams, J.A. et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Chemoprevention with Proton Pump Inhibitors in Barrett’s Esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 59, 1222–1230 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3186-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3186-3

Keywords

Navigation