Skip to main content
Log in

Islam and democracy

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Commentary to to this article was published on 19 October 2012

Abstract

Using the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices, Rowley and Smith (Public Choice 139(3–4):273, 2009) found that countries with Muslim majorities enjoy less freedom and are less democratic than countries in which Muslims are a minority. Because the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices have been criticized on several grounds, I reinvestigate Rowley and Smith’s finding using the new Democracy-Dictatorship data from Cheibub et al. (Public Choice 143(1–2):67, 2010). The empirical results confirm that countries with Muslim majorities are indeed less likely to be democratic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, A., Delis, M. D., & Kammas, P. (2010). Are democratic governments more efficient? European Journal of Political Economy. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.04.004.

  • Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterley, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 158–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, N., & Bjørnskov, C. (2010). Is the importance of religion in daily life related to social trust? Cross-country and cross-state comparisons. Working Paper, Ratio Institute. Stockholm.

  • Borooah, V. K., & Paldam, M. (2007). Why is the world short of democracy? A cross-country analysis of barriers to representative government. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(3), 582–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheibub, J., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1–2), 67–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooray, A., & Potrafke, N. (2010). Gender inequality in education: political institutions or culture and religion? European Journal of Political Economy. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.08.004.

  • De Haan, J., & Sturm, J.-E. (2003). Does more democracy lead to greater economic freedom? New evidence for developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 547–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W., & Sewadeh, M. (2001). Global development network growth database. Washington: Worldbank Economic and Development Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D., Bates, R., Goldstone, J., Kristensen, I., & O’Halloran, S. (2006). Democratic transitions. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 551–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facchini, F. (2010). Religion, law and development: Islam and Christianity—why is it in occident and not in the orient that man invented the institutions of freedom? European Journal of Law and Economics, 29(1), 103–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassebner, M., Lamla, M. J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2009). Extreme bounds of democracy. KOF Working Paper No. 224. Zurich.

  • Hillman, A. L. (2007a). Economic and security consequences of supreme values. Public Choice, 131(3–4), 259–280. Reprinted as: Hillman, A. L. (2008). An economic perspective on radical Islam. In A. Frisch & E. Inbar (Eds.), Radical Islam and international security: challenges and responses. Routledge, London (pp. 44–69).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. L. (2007b). Democracy and low-income countries. In J. Casas Pardo & P. Schwartz (Eds.), Public choice and challenges of democracy (pp. 277–294). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1997). Islam and underdevelopment: an old puzzle revisited. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 153(1), 41–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-di-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics and Government, 15(1), 222–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maseland, R., & Van Hoorn, A. (2010). Why Muslims like democracy yet have so little of it. Public Choice. doi:101007/s11127-010-9642-5.

  • Munck, G., & Verkuilen, J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, S. W., & Tomal, A. (2009). Religion and female educational attainment. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41(5), 961–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D., & Wacziarg, R. (2005). Do democratic transitions produce bad economic outcomes? American Economic Review, 95(2), 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. L. (2001). Does oil hinder democracy? World Politics, 53(April), 325–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. K., & Smith, N. (2009). Islam’s democracy paradox: Muslims claim to like democracy, so why do they have so little? Public Choice, 139(3–4), 273–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1991). The Penn World Table (Mark 5): an expanded set of international comparisons, 1950–1988. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(May), 327–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vreeland, J. R. (2008). The effect of political regime on civil war: unpacking anocracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(3), 401–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niklas Potrafke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potrafke, N. Islam and democracy. Public Choice 151, 185–192 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9741-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9741-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation