Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Natural orifice (NOTES) transurethral sutureless radical prostatectomy with thulium laser support: first patient report

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this descriptive study was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the first true transurethral sutureless radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in humans using the NOTES technique.

Materials and methods

A 77-year-old man with clinically localized bilateral prostate cancer (Gleason 3 + 4 = 7 in 80% of 12 biopsy cores) and a serum PSA level of 2.1 ng/ml underwent our first natural orifice transurethral radical thulium laser prostatectomy within toto organ retrieval via sectio alta. The surgical procedure is described.

Results

The procedure was completed successfully. Overall operation time was 312 min; laser time was 46 min with 151 KJ. Postoperative hemoglobin was 9.4 g/dl, and the hematocrit was 28%. A cystogram on the 7th postoperative day showed no signs of extravasation and the transurethral catheter was removed, and a flexible cystoscopy on the 9th day demonstrated a sufficient arbitrarily sphincter closure against irrigation flow.

Conclusion

The presented descriptive report demonstrates that natural orifice transurethral radical thulium laser prostatectomy for prostate cancer is feasible and safe. Potential candidates include older patients with low-risk cancers and urinary obstruction. Further prospective reports are necessary to evaluate functional and oncological outcome for this innovative technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alsaid B, Bessede T, Diallo D, Moszkowicz D, Karam I, Benoit G, Droupy S (2011) Division of autonomic nerves within the neurovascular bundles distally into corpora cavernosa and corpus spongiosum components: immunohistochemical confirmation with three-dimensional reconstruction. Eur Urol 59(6):902–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bach T, Huck N, Wezel F, Häcker A, Gross AJ, Michel MS (2010) Seventy versus 120 W thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet 2 microm continuous-wave laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic ex vivo evaluation. BJU Int 106(3):368–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bach T, Xia SJ, Yang Y, Mattioli S, Watson GM, Gross AJ, Herrmann TR (2010) Thulium:YAG 2 mum cw laser prostatectomy: where do we stand? World J Urol 28(2):163–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bach T, Netsch C, Haecker A, Michel MS, Herrmann TR, Gross AJ (2010) Thulium: YAG laser enucleation (vapoenucleation) of the prostate: safety and durability during intermediate-term follow-up. World J Urol 28(1):39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herrmann TR, Bach T, Imkamp F, Georgiou A, Burchardt M, Oelke M, Gross AJ (2010) Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP): transurethral anatomical prostatectomy with laser support. Introduction of a novel technique for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. World J Urol 28(1):45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reuter HJ (1980) Atlas der urologischen Endosko-pie. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp S21–S33

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reuter MA, Dietz (2009) Radical transurethral resection of the prostate. An alternative therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer. Urol A 48(7):740–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Krambeck AE, Humphreys MR, Andrews PE, Lingeman JE (2010) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: radical prostatectomy in the canine model. J Endourol 24(9):1493–1496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Humphreys MR, Krambeck AE, Andrews PE, Castle EP, Lingeman JE (2009) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgical radical prostatectomy: proof of concept. J Endourol 23(4):669–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Tannapfel A, Liatsikos EN (2006) Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Urology 67(1):17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group. ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20:329–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bazzi WM, Wagner O, Stroup SP, Silberstein JL, Belkind N, Katagiri T, Paleari J, Duro A, Ramamoorthy S, Talamini MA, Horgan S, Derweesh IH (2011) Transrectal hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) nephrectomy in a porcine model. Urology 77(3):518–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haber GP, Crouzet S, Kamoi K, Berger A, Aron M, Goel R, Canes D, Desai M, Gill IS, Kaouk JH (2008) Robotic NOTES (natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery) in reconstructive urology: initial laboratory experience. Urology 71(6):996–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Micali S, Pini G, Teber D, Sighinolfi MC, De Stefani S, Bianchi G, Rassweiler J (2010) New trends in minimally invasive urological surgery. What is beyond the robot? World J Urol. doi:10.1007/s00345-010-0588-5

  15. Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, Crouzet S, Brethauer S, Firoozi F, Goldman HB, White WM (2010) Pure natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) transvaginal nephrectomy. Eur Urol 57(4):723–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gettman MT, Cadeddu JA (2008) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in urology: initial experience. J Endourol 22(4):783–788 (Review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sotelo R, de Andrade R, Fernández G, Ramirez D, Di Grazia E, Carmona O, Moreira O, Berger A, Aron M, Desai MM, Gill IS (2010) NOTES hybrid transvaginal radical nephrectomy for tumour: stepwise progression toward a first successful clinical case. Eur Urol 57(1):138–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alcaraz A, Peri L, Molina A, Goicoechea I, García E, Izquierdo L, Ribal MJ (2010) Feasibility of transvaginal NOTES-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. Eur Urol 57(2):233–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raman JD, Bergs RA, Fernandez R, Bagrodia A, Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Pearle MS, Cadeddu JA (2009) Complete transvaginal NOTES nephrectomy using magnetically anchored instrumentation. J Endourol 23(3):367–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Box G, Averch T, Cadeddu J, Cherullo E, Clayman R, Desai M, Frank I, Gettman M, Gill I, Gupta M, Haber GP, Kaouk J, Landman J, Lima E, Ponsky L, Rane A, Sawyer M, Humphreys M (2008) Urologic NOTES working group. Nomenclature of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures in urology. J Endourol 22(11):2575–2581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Till H, Burchardt M, Herrmann TR, Liatsikos EN (2009) Current status of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology. World J Urol 27(6):767–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagele U, Walcher U, Herrmann TR (2011) Initial experience with laparoscopic single-incision triangulated umbilical surgery (SITUS) in simple and radical nephrectomy. World J Urol. doi:10.1007/s00345-011-0670-7

  23. Wendt-Nordahl G, Huckele S, Honeck P, Alken P, Knoll T, Michel MS, Haecker A (2008) Systemic evaluation of recently introduced 2 μm continuous-wave thulium laser for vaporesection of the prostate. J Endourol 22:1041–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gianduzzo TR, Chang CM, El-Shazly M, Mustajab A, Moon DA, Eden CG (2007) Laser nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a feasibility study. BJU Int 99(4):875–879 Epub 2007 Jan 22. PubMed PMID: 17244283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shah HN, Kausik V, Hegde S et al (2006) Evaluation of fluid absorption during holmium laser enucleation of prostate by breath ethanol technique. J Urol 175:537–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Herrmann TR, Rabenalt R, Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Imkamp F, Tezval H, Gross AJ, Jonas U, Burchardt M (2007) Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? World J Urol 25(2):149–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ficarra V, Novara G, Racalanza S, D’Elia C, Secco S, Iafrate M, Cavalleri S, Artibani W (2009) A prospective non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 104:534–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stolzenburg J-U, Liatsikos EN, Rabenalt R et al (2006) Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Eur Urol 49:103–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Choi WW, Freire MP, Soukup JR, Yin L, Lipsitz SR, Carvas F, Williams SB, Hu JC (2011) Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J Urol 29(1):21–27 Epub 20 Oct 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Simforoosh N, Javaherforooshzadeh A, Aminsharifi A, Tabibi A (2009) Early continence after open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with sutureless vesicourethral alignment: an alternative technique, 8 years’ experience. Urol J 6(3):163–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Myers RP (2002) Detrusor apron, associated vascular plexus, and avascular plane: relevance to radical retropubic prostatectomy-anatomic and surgical commentary. Urology 59:472–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Watz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ et al (2010) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Asimakopoulos AD, Annino F, D’Orazio A, Pereira CF, Mugnier C, Hoepffner JL, Piechaud T, Gaston R (2010) Complete periprostatic anatomy preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP): the new pubovesical complex-sparing technique. Eur Urol 58(3):407–417 Epub 18 May 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Drouin SJ, Vaessen C, Hupertan V, Comperat E, Misraï V, Haertig A, Bitker MO, Chartier-Kastler E, Richard F, Rouprêt M (2009) Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 27(5):599–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kowalczyk KJ, Yu HY, Ulmer W, Williams SB, Hu JC (2011) Outcomes assessment in men undergoing open retropubic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. doi:10.1007/s00345-011-0662-7

  36. Hu JC, Gold KF, Pashos CL et al (2003) Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes. J Clin Oncol 21:401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kao TC, Cruess DF, Garner D et al (2000) Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence, stricture after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 163:858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Elliott SP, Meng MV, Elkin EP et al (2007) Incidence of urethral stricture after primary treatment for prostate cancer: data from CaPSURE. J Urol 178:529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR et al (2009) Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 302:1557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sandhu JS, Gotto GT, Herran LA, Scardino PT, Eastham JA, Rabbani F (2011) Age, obesity, medical comorbidities and surgical technique are predictive of symptomatic anastomotic strictures after contemporary radical prostatectomy. J Urol 185(6):2148–2152. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rabenalt R, Arsov C, Giessing M, Winter C, Albers P (2010) Extraperitoneal laparo-endoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy: first experience. World J Urol 28(6):705–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R, Khanna R, Forest S, Yang B, Altunrende F, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH (2010) Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy: technique and early outcomes. Eur Urol 58(4):544–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn L-C et al (2007) Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 51:629–639.8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ganzer R, Blana A, Gaumann A et al (2008) Topographical anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantification and computerised planimetry. Eur Urol 54(2):353–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. van der Poel HG, de Blok W (2009) Role of extent of fascia preservation and erectile function after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 73(4):816–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Herrmann TR, Rabenalt R, Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Imkamp F, Tezval H, Gross AJ, Jonas U, Burchardt M (2007) Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? World J Urol 25(2):149–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology and Andrology, LKH Hall i.Tirol, Landeskrankenhaus Hall i.T., Milser Str. 10, 6060, Hall i.Triol, Austria

    Udo Nagele, Ute Walcher & Andre P. Nicklas

  2. Eilenriede Clinic Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    Aristotelis G. Anastasiadis

  3. Division of Endourology and Minimal Invasive Therapy (MIT), Department of Urology and Urooncology, Hannover Medical School, Carl Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany

    Axel S. Merseburger & Thomas R. W. Herrmann

Authors
  1. Udo Nagele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aristotelis G. Anastasiadis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ute Walcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andre P. Nicklas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Axel S. Merseburger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas R. W. Herrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Udo Nagele or Thomas R. W. Herrmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagele, U., Anastasiadis, A.G., Walcher, U. et al. Natural orifice (NOTES) transurethral sutureless radical prostatectomy with thulium laser support: first patient report. World J Urol 30, 625–631 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0714-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0714-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation