We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.11.38
Free first page

Bibliography

  • Deverka P, Vernon J, McLeod H: Economic opportunities and challenges for pharmacogenomics. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.50,423–437 (2010).
  • Gold H, Hall M, Blinder V et al.: Cost–effectiveness of pharmacogenomics testing for UGT1A1 before irinotecan administration for metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer115(17),3858–3867 (2009).
  • Deverka P: Pharmacogenomics, evidence, and the role of payers. Pub. Health Genomics12,149–157 (2009).
  • Piccart-Gebhart M, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B et al.: Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in Her2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.352,1659–1672 (2005).
  • Romond E, Perez E, Bryant J et al.: Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2 positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.353,1673–1684 (2005).
  • Frueh F, Amur S, Mummaneni M et al.: Pharmacogenomic biomarker information in drug labels approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration: prevalence of related drug use. Pharmacotherapy28(8),992–998 (2008).
  • Lievre A, Bachet J, Le Corre D et al.: KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res.66(8),3992–3995 (2006).
  • Rogowski W, Grosse S, Khoury M: Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice. Nat. Rev. Genet.10,489–495 (2009).
  • Khoury M, Berg A, Coates R et al.: The evidence dilemma in genomic medicine. Health Aff.27(6),1600–1611 (2008).
  • 10  Phillips K, Van Bebber S: A systematic review of cost–effectiveness analyses of pharmacogenomic interventions. Pharmacogenomics5,1139–1149 (2004).
  • 11  Gerber AM, Tunis S: Does comparative-effectiveness research threaten personalized medicine?. N. Engl. J. Med.360,1925–1927 (2009).
  • 12  Meckley L, Neumann P: Personalized medicine: factors influencing reimbursement. Health Pol.94,91–100 (2010).
  • 13  Phillips K: The intersection of biotechnology and pharmacogenomics: health policy implications. Health Aff.25,1271–1280 (2006).
  • 14  Paci D, Ibarreta D: Economic and cost–effectiveness considerations for pharmacogenetics tests: an integral part of translational research and innovation uptake in personalized medicine. Curr. Pharmacogen. Pers. Med.7,284–296 (2009).
  • 15  Epstein R, Teagarden J: Comparative effectiveness research and personalized medicine. Pharmacoeconomics28(10),905–913 (2010).
  • 16  Dendukuri N, Khetani K, McIsaac M et al.: Testing for HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. CMAJ176(10),1429–1434 (2007).
  • 17  Tanisha C, Reginald D, Williams A et al.: Medicare’s coverage of colorectal cancer drugs: a case study in evidence development and policy. Health Aff.25(5),1231–1239 (2009).
  • 18  Hamburg M, Collins F: The path to personalized medicine. N. Engl. J. Med.363,301–304 (2010).
  • 19  Hallberg B, Palmer R: Crizotinib – latest champion in the cancer wars?. N. Engl. J. Med.363,1760–1762 (2010).
  • 20  Jenkins A: A dying wish. Forbes Mag.28 (2011).