Skip to main content
Log in

Institutional self-citation rates: A three year study of universities in the United States

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) data, this paper calculated institutional self citations rates (ISCRs) for 96 of the top research universities in the United States from 2005–2007. Exhibiting similar temporal patterns of author and journal self-citations, the ISCR was 29% in the first year post-publication, and decreased significantly in the second year post-publication (19%). Modeling the data via power laws revealed total publications and citations did not correlate with the ISCR, but did correlate highly with ISCs. California Institute of Technology exhibited the highest ISCR at 31%. Academic and cultural factors are discussed in relation to ISCRs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. D., Clemmons, J. R., Stephan, P. E. (2004), Standing on Academic Shoulders: Measuring Scientific Influence in Universities. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, (NBER Working Paper No. 10875)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksnes, D. W. (2003), A macro study of self-citation, Scientometrics, 56(2): 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksnes, D. W. (2006), Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2): 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anseel, F., Duyck, W., De Baene, W., Brysbaert, M. (2004), Journal impact factors and self-citations: Implications for psychology journals, American Psychologist, 59(1): 49–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausloos, M., Lambiotte, R., Scharnhorst, A., Hellsten, I. (2007), Andrzej Pekalski Networks of Scientific Interests with Internal Degrees of Freedom through Self-citation Analysis, Arxiv preprint arXiv:0710.1800.

  • Baldi, S. (1998), Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model, American Sociological Review, 63(6): 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demaria, A. N. (2003), A report card for journals, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 42(5): 952–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist, L., Frommen, J. G. (2008), The h-index and self-citations, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(5): 250–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falagas, M. E., Kavvadia, P. (2006), “Eigenlob”: self-citation in biomedical journals, FASEB Journal, 20(8): 1039–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassoulaki, A., Paraskeva, A., Papilas, K., Karabinis, G. (2000), Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 84(2): 266–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., Aksnes, D. W. (2007), Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics, 72(3): 427–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frandsen, T. F. (2007), Journal self-citations — Analysing the JIF mechanism, Journal of Informetrics, 1(1): 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gami, A. S., Montori, V. A., Wilczynski, N. L., Haynes, R. B. (2004), Author self-citation in the diabetes literature, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170(13): 1925–1927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E., Welljams-Dorof, A. (1992), Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making, Science and Public Policy, 19(5): 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Debackere, K., Thijs, B., Schubert, A. (2006), A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy, Scientometrics, 67(2): 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellsten, I., Lambiotte, R., Scharnhorst, A., Ausloos, M. (2007), Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists’ field mobility? Scientometrics, 72(3): 469–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2003), Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(3): 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C. D., Jennions, M. D. (2006), The h index and career assessment by numbers, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(4): 167–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawani, S. M. (1982), On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(5): 281–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macroberts, M. H., Macroberts, B. R. (1989), Problems of citation analysis: A critical review, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5): 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maczelka, H., Zsindely, S. (1992), All well if starts well? Citation infancy of recently launched chemistry journals, Scientometrics, 25(2): 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2002), The impact factors debate: the ISI’s uses and limits, Nature, 415(6873): 731–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motamed, M., Mehta, D., Basavaraj, S., Fuad, F. (2002), Self citations and impact factors in otolaryngology journals, Clinical Otolaryngology, 27(5): 318–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisonger, T. E. (2000), Use of the Journal Citation Reports for serials management in research libraries: An investigation of the effect of self-citation on journal rankings in library and information science and genetics, College & Research Libraries, 61(3): 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Beckmann, M. (1995), Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialties, Scientometrics, 33(3): 351–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (1999), Temporal differences in self-citation rates of scientific journals, Scientometrics, 44(3): 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, M. (2007a), A case study of the Hirsch index for 26 non-prominent physicists, Annalen Der Physik, 16(9): 640–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, M. (2007b), The influence of self-citation corrections on Egghe’s g index, Arxiv preprint arXiv:0707.4577.

  • Schreiber, M. (2007c), Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index, Epl, 78(3): 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seglen, P. O. (1997), Citations and journal impact factors: Questionable indicators of research quality, Allergy: European Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, 52(11): 1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thijs, B., Glänzel, W. (2005), The influence of author self-citations on bibliometric meso-indicators. The case of European universities, Scientometrics, 66(1): 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, M. Y. (2006), Journal self-citation study for semiconductor literature: Synchronous and diachronous approach, Information Processing & Management, 42(6): 1567–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998), The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results, Scientometrics, 42(3): 423–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Raan, A. F. J. (2008a), Bibliometric statistical properties of the 100 largest European research universities: Prevalent scaling rules in the science system, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(3): 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2008b), Self-citation as an impact-reinforcing mechanism in the science system, Arxiv preprint arXiv:0801.0524.

  • White, H. D. (2001), Authors as citers over time, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2): 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dean Hendrix.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hendrix, D. Institutional self-citation rates: A three year study of universities in the United States. Scientometrics 81, 321–331 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2160-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2160-2

Keywords

Navigation