Skip to main content
Log in

The VP within Process Nominals: Evidence from Adverbs and the VP Anaphor Do-So

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent accounts of process nominals postulate a VP within the nominalized structure. A verb becomes a nominal by a head raising operation to a nominal affix. This view contrasts with analyses of process nominals as (pure) nominals with partial verbal properties, originally due to Chomsky (1970). Contributing to this debate, we will argue that direct evidence indicates that English process nominals contain a VP. Our evidence comes from the distribution of adverbs on the one hand, and from the presence of the VP anaphor do so in process nominals on the other. We show that a portion of the verbal extended projection specifically excluding IP or CP is present in process nominals. An array of word order facts about process nominals falls into place when we further assume that the verb is raised from VP over the subject, the object, and adverbs, adjoining to a nominal affix. Our analysis moreover adds to the evidence for functional structure above VP and supports particular claims about the syntax-morphology interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abney, Steve. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect, Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  • Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit. 1991. 'The Causative-Inchoative Alternation: a Case Study in Parallel Morphology', The Linguistic Review 8, 119–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit. 1993. 'Derived Nominals', Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit. 1994. 'The Projection of Arguments', in E. Benedicto and J. Runner (eds), UMOP 17, 19–47, GLSA, UMass, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit. 1996. 'The Construct in Review', in J. Lecarme, J. Lowenstamm and U. Shlonsky (eds), Studies in Afroasiatic Grammar, Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague, pp. 30–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit. 1997. 'The Morphology-Syntax Interface: A Study of Autonomy', in W. U. Dressler, U. M. Prinzhorn and J. R. Rennison (eds), Advances in Morphology, in Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 97, 5–30, Mouton de Gruyter, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit. 1998. 'Passive without θ-Grid', in S. Lapointe, D. Brentari and P. Farrell (eds), Morphological and Its Relations to Phonology and Syntax, CSLI, 60–99, Stanford University.

  • Borer, Hagit. 1999. 'The Form, the Forming, and the Formation of Nominals', Ms., University of Southern California.

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1970. 'Remarks on Nominalization', in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184–221, Baisdell, Waltham, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, Guglielmo. 1998. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Déchaine, Rose-Marie. 1994. 'Ellipsis and the Position of Subjects', NELS 24, 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Edwin Williams. 1987. On the Definition of Word, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1989. 'Generalized IP Structure, Case and VS Word Order', in I. Laka and A. Mahajan (eds), MIT Working Paper in Linguistics 10, 75–111.

  • Fu, Jingqi. 1994. On Deriving Chinese Derived Nominals: Evidence for Parallel Morphology, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Giorgi, A. and G. Longobardi. 1991. The Syntax of Noun Phrases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer, Jorge and Ivan Sag. 1976. 'Deep and Surface Anaphora', Linguistics Inquiry 7, 391–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subject, Events and Licensing, Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.

  • Hazout, Ilan. 1991. Verbal Nouns: Theta Theoretic Studies in Hebrew and Arabic, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hout, Angelike. 1992. 'Linking and Projection Based on Event Structure', Ms., Tilburg University, Tilburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Hout, Angelike. 1996. Event Semantics of Verb Frame Alternations, TILDIL Dissertation Series, 1996–1961.

  • van Hout, Angelike and Thomas Roeper. 1999. 'The Impact of Nominalizations on Passive-able and Middles: Burzio's Generalizations and Feature Movement in the Lexicon', in Papers from UPENN-MIT Round Table on the Lexicon, 185–211.

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, Otto. 1961. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part V. Syntax, (original edition: 1940), Allen & Unwin.

  • Kehler, Andrew and Gregory Ward. 1995. 'On the Anaphoric Status of Do So', LSA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche. 1988. 'Subjects', Ms., University of California at Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1994. 'On External Arguments', University of Massachusetts Occasional Paper 17, 103–130.

  • Lakoff, George and John Ross. 1972. 'A Note on Anaphoric Islands and Causatives', Linguistic Inquiry 3, 121–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, David. 1986 'The Interpretation of Derived Nominals', in A. Farley, P. Farley and K. McCullough (eds), Chicago Linguistic Society 22, 231–247.

  • Lees, Robert. 1960. The Grammar of English Process Nominals, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y-H. Audrey. 1997a. 'A Number Projection', Proceedings of ICCL-5, 199–222.

  • Li, Y-H. Audrey. 1997b. 'Structure and Interpretation of Nominal Expressions', Ms., University of Southern California.

  • Li, Yafei. 1990. 'Xo-Binding and Verb Incorporation', Linguistic Inquiry 21, 399–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. 'Reference and Proper Names', Linguistic Inquiry 25, 609-666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec. 1999. 'Creating Verbs Above and Below Little ν', Ms., MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Murasugi, Kumiko. 1990. 'The Derivation of Derived Nominals', Ms., MIT.

  • Newmeyer, Frederick. 1970. 'The Derivation of the English Action Process Nominal', in Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 408–419, Chicago.

  • Randall, Janet. 1988. 'Inheritance', in W. Wilkins (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 21, 129–146, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Elisabeth. 1987. 'NSO Orders in Modern Hebrew', in J. McDonough and B. Plunkett (eds), Proceedings of NELS 17, 521–537.

  • Ritter, Elisabeth. 1991. 'Two Functional Categories in Noun Phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew', Syntax and Semantics 25, 37–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Thomas. 1987a. 'The Syntax of Compound Reference', Ms., University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Thomas. 1987b, 'Implicit Arguments and the Head-Complement Relation', Linguistic Inquiry 18, 267–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Thomas. 1993. 'Explicit Syntax in the Lexicon: The Representation of Process Nominals', in J. Pustejovsky (ed.), Semantics and the Lexicon, 93–123, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, Thomas. 1995. 'Inherent Binding and the Syntax/Lexicon Interface: Distinguishing DP, NP and N', in M. Everaert and J. Grimshaw (eds), Lexical Specification and Lexical Insertion, 305–328.

  • Roeper, Thomas. 1999. 'Leftward Movement in Morphology', in V. Lin, C. Krause, B. Bruening and K. Arregi (eds), Morphology and Syntax Cycle Two, MITWPL Vol 34, 35–67.

  • Roeper, T. and A. van Hout. 1999. 'The Impact of Nominalization, Passive,-able, and Middle: Feature-Movement in the Lexicon', in Papers from the UPENN/MIT Roundtable on the Lexicon, 175–200.

  • Roeper T. and D. Siegel. 1978. 'A Lexical Transformation for Verb Compounds', Linguistic Inquiry 9, 199–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozwadowska, Boczena. 1988. 'Thematic Restrictions on Derived Nominals', in Wendy Wilkins (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 21, 147–165, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siloni, Tal. 1994. Noun Phrases and Nominalizations, Doctoral Dissertation, University of

  • Geneva. Speas, Margaret. 1990. Phrase Structure in Natural Language, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sproat, Richard. 1985. On Deriving the Lexicon, Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.

  • Stowell, Timothy. 1981. On the Origins of Phrase-Structure, Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.

  • Thomason, Richmond. 1985. 'Some Issues Concerning the Interpretation of Derived and Gerundive Nominals', Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valois, Daniel. 1991. The Internal Syntax of DP, Doctoral Dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1973. 'Formal Properties of Lexical Derivations', Quarterly Progress Reports of RLE, # 108, 279–287, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasow, Thomas and Thomas Roeper. 1974. 'On the Subject of Gerunds', in Foundations of Language 8.2, 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Gregory et al. 1991. 'A Pragmatic Analysis of So-called Anaphoric Islands', Language 67, 439–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubizaretta, Maria-Luise. 1987. Levels of Representation, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fu, J., Roeper, T. & Borer, H. The VP within Process Nominals: Evidence from Adverbs and the VP Anaphor Do-So. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19, 549–582 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010654105760

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010654105760

Keywords

Navigation