Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of effective rainfall estimation methods for lowland rice

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dastane (1974) recommended four different methods, namely evapotranspiration-rainfall ratio method, Indian-1 and Indian-2 methods and Vietnam method for estimating effective rainfall for rice crop. These methods together with the USDA-SCS method were compared against the physicallybased water balance method. The analysis was carried out using daily data of evapotranspiration (ET) and rainfall pertaining to thirteen seasons with special reference to lowland paddy rice in South India. Among the different methods, the ET-rainfall ratio and Indian-2 methods estimate the effective rainfall values nearly closer to those by the water balance method. The USDA-SCS method underpredicts values of effective rainfall compared to other methods. The ET-rainfall ratio and Indian-2 methods can be used as alternatives to the water balance method for determining effective rainfall which in turn be used in estimating irrigation requirements for lowland rice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brouwer, C., and Heibloem, M., 1986, Irrigation water needs,Irrigation Water Management Training Manual 3, Food and Agric. Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuenca, R. H., 1989,Irrigation System Design: An Engineering Approach, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, B. N., and Maite, S., 1985,Principles and Practices of Rice Growing, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastane, N. G., 1974, Effective rainfall in irrigated agriculture, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 25, Food and Agric. Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershfield, D. M., 1964, Effective rainfall and irrigation water requirements,J. Irrig. Drainage Engg; ASCE 90(2), 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. E., Burman, R. D., and Allen, R. G. (eds.). 1990. Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements,ASCE-Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice 70, Amer. Soc. of Civil Engineers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patwardhan, A. S., Nieber, J. L., and Johns, E. L., 1990, Effective rainfall estimation methods,J. Irrig. Drainage Engg; ASCE 116(2), 182–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, B. S., Chawalit, C., and Pantheep, V. C., 1989, Chi river basin irrigation demand model,Water Resour. Manag. 3, 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRRI (1981), Irrigation and water management, International Rice Research Institute Report for 1980, Los Banos.

  • SimhadriRao, B., 1993, Optimal operation of an irrigation tank, M. Tech. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Engg., Ind. Instt. of Tech., Madras.

  • Tomar, V. S., and O'Toole, J. C., 1980, Water use in lowland rice cultivation in Asia: A review of evapotranspiration,Agric. Water Manage. 3, 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. K., and Hagen, R. E., 1981,Irrigated Rice Production Systems: Design Procedure, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohan, S., Simhadrirao, B. & Arumugam, N. Comparative study of effective rainfall estimation methods for lowland rice. Water Resour Manage 10, 35–44 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00698810

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00698810

Key words

Navigation