Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Economic development, social–political factors and ecological footprint: a global panel data analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
SN Business & Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of the EKC has great importance, because it makes it feasible to predict the future level of environmental degradation with the help of forecasted GDP. This study reinvestigates the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis by measuring environment degradation using ecological footprint as a measure of the environmental quality. The sample is based on 128 countries over the time period 1971–2017. This study incorporates socio-political factors as the determinants of environmental quality. The empirical analysis has been done by employing different traditional and latest econometrics techniques for instance, Pooled Ordinary Least Square (POLS), Fixed Effects Method (FEM), Random Effects Method (REM), Driscoll Kraay (DK) standard errors, Fully Modified Ordinary Least Square (FMOLS) and cross section weighted panel EGLS. Moreover, the diagnostic tests are also performed for the detection of multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity and so on. The finding indicates that there is an inverted U shaped relationship between economic growth and ecological footprint. This study accepts the validity of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis. Moreover, energy consumption, urbanization and life expectancy at birth increase the ecological footprint. In addition, improvement in political institutions also improves the quality of the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

We will provide data on request. Furthermore, data is available on only following web address. World Bank (2019). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Online] Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi (September 1st, 2019). Global Footprint Network (2018). Living planet report. Species and spaces, people and places. [Online] Available at: http://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/analyzeTrends?type=EFCtotandcn=5001

References

  • Alam MM, Murad MW, Noman AHM, Ozturk I (2016) Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: testing environmental kuznets curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol Ind 70:466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azomahou T, Laisney F, Van PN (2006) Economic development and CO2 emissions: a nonparametric panel approach. J Public Econ 90(6–7):1347–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi P, Sahu SK (2020) Energy intensity, productivity and pollution loads: empirical evidence from manufacturing sector of India. Stud Microecon 8(2):194–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagliani M, Bravo G, Dalmazzone S (2008) A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator. Ecol Econ 65(3):650–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baloch MA, Zhang J, Iqbal K, Iqbal Z (2019) The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(6):6199–6208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB, Burgess JC (2001) The economics of tropical deforestation. J Econ Surv 15(3):413–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman W (1992) Economic growth and the environment: whose growth? Whose environment? World Dev 20(4):481–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begum RA, Sohag K, Abdullah SMS, Jaafar M (2015) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:594–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charfeddine L, Mrabet Z (2017) The impact of economic development and social-political factors on ecological footprint: a panel data analysis for 15 MENA countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:138–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chebbi HE (2009) Investigating linkages between economic growth, energy consumption and pollutant emissions in Tunisia. No. 1005-2016-79365

  • Chiu YB (2012) Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve in developing countries: a panel smooth transition regression approach. Can J Agric Econ/revue Canadienne D’agroeconomie 60(2):177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth, and the environment. J Econ Lit 42(1):7–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P, Maler KG (1995) Poverty, institutions, and the environmental resource-base. Handb Dev Econ 3:2371–2463

  • Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Kadner S, Zwickel T et al (eds) (2011) Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. No. w3914. National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan ST, Xia E, Khan NH, Shah SMA (2019) Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2929–2938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Q, Bertness MD, Bruno JF, Li B, Chen G, Coverdale TC et al (2014) Economic development and coastal ecosystem change in China. Sci Rep 4:5995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1996) IPCC Second Assessment on Climate Change. International Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalil A, Mahmud SF (2009) Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: # cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy 37(12):5167–5172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantz V, Feng Q (2006) Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: where’s the EKC? Ecol Econ 57(2):229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo S, York R (2008) Agricultural exports and the environment: a cross-national study of fertilizer and pesticide consumption. Rural Sociol 73(1):82–104

  • Majeed MT, Mazhar M (2019) Re-examination of environmental kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of biocapacity, human capital, and trade. Pak J Commer Soc Sci 14(1):202–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Martı́nez-Zarzoso I, Bengochea-Morancho A (2004) Pooled mean group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO2. Econ Lett 82(1):121–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mozumder P, Berrens RP (2007) Inorganic fertilizer use and biodiversity risk: an empirical investigation. Ecol Econ 62(3–4):538–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Acaravci A (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(9):3220–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (No. 992927783402676). International Labour Organization

  • Roca J, Padilla E, Farré M, Galletto V (2001) Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: discussing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecol Econ 39(1):85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph A, Figge L (2017) Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization? Ecol Ind 81:348–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu SK, Bagchi P, Kumar A, Tan KH (2021) Technology, price instruments and energy intensity: a study of firms in the manufacturing sector of the Indian economy. Ann Oper Res 1–21

  • Saqib M, Benhmad F (2021) Does ecological footprint matter for the shape of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(11):13634–13648

  • Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2018) Assessment of contribution of Australia’s energy production to CO2 emissions and environmental degradation using statistical dynamic approach. Sci Total Environ 639:888–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Zeshan M, Afza T (2012) Is energy consumption effective to spur economic growth in Pakistan? New evidence from bounds test to level relationships and Granger causality tests. Econ Model 29(6):2310–2319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Mutascu M, Azim P (2013) Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soytas U, Sari R, Ewing BT (2007) Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol Econ 62(3–4):482–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI, Common MS (2001) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur? J Environ Econ Manag 41(2):162–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamazian A, Rao BB (2010) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from Transitional Economies. Energy Econ 32(1):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin GA, Salahuddin M, Alam K, Gow J (2017) Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecol Ind 77:166–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Bilgili F (2018) A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. J Clean Prod 188:144–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1992) World development report. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2019) World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi. Accessed Sept 1 2019

  • Zeraibi A, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shehzad K (2021) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypotheses in Chinese provinces: A nexus between regional government expenditures and environmental quality. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(18):9667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J (2021) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis on CO2 emissions: evidence for China. J Risk Fin Manage 14(3):93

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the editor, associate editor, and anonymous referees of the journal for their extremely useful suggestions for the improvement of this paper.

Funding

No funding for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Isma Samreen & Muhammad Tariq Majeed

Authors
  1. Isma Samreen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Tariq Majeed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors contributed to the study. Main idea of the paper is provided by Majeed. Data collection and analysis were performed by Samreen. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Samreen and Majeed work on the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isma Samreen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

“On behalf of both authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.”

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for contribution

I am free to contact any of the people involved in the research to seek further clarification and information.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samreen, I., Majeed, M.T. Economic development, social–political factors and ecological footprint: a global panel data analysis. SN Bus Econ 2, 132 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00320-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-022-00320-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation