Abstract
The objective of this paper is to investigate the nonlinear relationship between ICT and CO2 emissions by controlling for economic growth, foreign direct investment, energy consumption, and trade openness. Using data from 16 Middle East and North African (MENA) countries over the period 1990–2019, we apply the Panel Smooth Transition Regression (PSTR) model, as introduced by (González A, Teräsvirta T, vanDijk D (2005) Panel smooth transition regression models. SEE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No. 604), to study the potential regime-switching behavior of the relationship between the variables. The results reveal the existence of a strong regime-switching effect between ICT and CO2 emissions. It was found that after reaching a certain threshold, ICT use and penetration starts to significantly mitigate environmental degradation. Our results show that high levels of ICT not only improve environmental quality but can also be part of the solution to combat the environmental challenges that the MENA region has faced over the past decades. In addition, to account for the potential endogeneity bias, we also develop and estimate a PSTR model with instrumental variables (IV-PSTR) using the approach of (Fouquau et al., Econ Model 25:284–299, 2008). The results obtained confirm those initially found by the PSTR model. The study concludes with policy implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
ICT can be measured with either non-monetary (e.g., mobile cellular subscriptions, fixed telephone subscriptions, percentage of individual using the Internet, fixed broadband subscriptions) or monetary variables (e.g., ICT investment, ICT capital stock). Due to the unavailability of monetary data, we limit our selection to non-monetary data (i.e., mobile cellular subscriptions and percentage of individual using the Internet) to make our study comparable to recent studies that used these variables to measure ICT use and penetration.
For more details on these two tests, please refer to González et al. (2017).
HAC stands for Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistency.
References
Ahmed Z, Le HP (2021) Linking information communication technology, trade globalization index, and CO 2 emissions: evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(7):8770–8781
Al-Mulali U, Tang CF, Ozturk I (2015) Does financial development reduce environmental degradation? Evidence from a panel study of 129 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(19):14891–14900
Amri F, Zaied YB, Lahouel BB (2019) ICT, total factor productivity, and carbon dioxide emissions in Tunisia. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 146:212–217
Asongu SA, Le Roux S, Biekpe N (2017) Environmental degradation, ICT and inclusive development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Policy 111:353–361
Asongu SA, Le Roux S, Biekpe N (2018) Enhancing ICT for environmental sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 127:209–216
Avom D, Nkengfack H, Fotio HK, Totouom A (2020) ICT and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa: effects and transmission channels. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 155:120028
Belaid F, Youssef M (2017) Environmental degradation, renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption, and economic growth: assessing the evidence from Algeria. Energy Policy 102:277–287
Belkhir L, Elmeligi A (2018) Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 and recommendations. J Clean Prod 177:448–463
Ben Lahouel B, Ben Zaied Y, Yang GL, Bruna MG, Song Y (2022) A non-parametric decomposition of the environmental performance-income relationship: evidence from a non-linear model. Ann Oper Res 313(1):525–558
Chen Y, Lee CC (2020) Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? Cross-country evidence. J Clean Prod 263:121550
Cheng C, Ren X, Dong K, Dong X, Wang Z (2021) How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. J Environ Manage 280:111818
Chiu YB, Lee CC (2019) Financial development, income inequality, and country risk. J Int Money Financ 93:1–18
Chiu YB, Lee CC (2020) Effects of financial development on energy consumption: the role of country risks. Energy Economics 90:104833
Collard F, Fève P, Portier F (2005) Electricity consumption and ICT in the French service sector. Energy Econ 27(3):541–550
Colletaz G, Hurlin C (2006) Threshold effects of the public capital productivity: an international panel smooth transition approach. LEO, Université d’Orléans. Working Paper https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00008056/document. Accessed 10 Mar 2022
Danish, Baloch MA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW (2019a) Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 678:632–638
Danish, Zhang J, Wang B, Latif Z (2019b) Towards cross-regional sustainable development: the nexus between information and communication technology, energy consumption, and CO 2 emissions. Sustain Dev 27(5):990–1000
Danish (2019) Effects of information and communication technology and real income on CO2 emissions: the experience of countries along Belt and Road. Telematics Inform 45:101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101300
Davies RB (1987) Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 74(1):33–43
Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455
Dou Y, Zhao J, Dong J (2021) Re-estimating the impact of natural gas on global carbon emissions: the role of technological innovation. Front Energy Res 9:62
El-Katiri L, Fattouh B (2017) A brief political economy of energy subsidies in the Middle East and North Africa. In: Luciani G (ed) Combining economic and political development: the experience of MENA, international development policy series 7. Geneva: Graduate Institute Publications, Boston: Brill-Nijhoff, pp 58–87. https://doi.org/10.4000/poldev.2267. Accessed 1 Sept 2021
Fouquau J, Hurlin C, Rabaud I (2008) The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: A panel smooth transition regression approach. Econ Model 25(2):284–299
González A, Terasvirta T, van Dijk D, Yang Y (2017) Panel smooth transition regression models. Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1152759/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2021
González A, Terasvirta T, Dijk D (2005) Panel smooth transition regression models. Working paper series in economics and finance, N° 604. Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden
Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working, Paper N°3914, NBER, Cambridge MA. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w3914/w3914.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2021
Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. J Econom 93(2):345–368
Hansen P, King A (1996) The determinants of health care expenditure: a cointegration approach. J Health Econ 15(1):127–137
Haseeb A, Xia E, Saud S, Ahmad A, Khurshid H (2019) Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? An empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(9):8594–8608
Higón DA, Gholami R, Shirazi F (2017) ICT and environmental sustainability: a global perspective. Telematics Inform 34(4):85–95
Hilty LM (2007) CO2 reduction with ICT: prospects and barriers. In EnviroInfo 1:35–42
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115(1):53–74
Jorisch D, Mallin C, Accurso M, Zaballos AG, Rodríguez EI (2018) Technology for climate action in latin America and the Caribbean: how ICT and mobile solutions contribute to a sustainable, low-carbon future. Washington, DC: IDB. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001184. Accessed 1 September 2021
Joyce PJ, Finnveden G, Håkansson C, Wood R (2019) A multi-impact analysis of changing ICT consumption patterns for Sweden and the EU: indirect rebound effects and evidence of decoupling. J Clean Prod 211:1154–1161
Klimova A, Rondeau E, Andersson K, Porras J, Rybin A, Zaslavsky A (2016) An international Master’s program in green ICT as a contribution to sustainable development. J Clean Prod 135:223–239
Lahouel BB, Taleb L, Zaied YB, Managi S (2021) Does ICT change the relationship between total factor productivity and CO2 emissions? Evidence based on a nonlinear model. Energy Econom 101:105406
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom 108(1):1–24
Menichettti E, El Gharras A, Karbuz S (2017) Material factors for the MENA region: energy trends. MENARA working papers, N°5. https://www.cidob.org/en/publications/publication_series/project_papers/menara_papers/working_papers/material_factors_for_the_mena_region_energy_trends. Accessed 1 September 2021
Moyer JD, Hughes BB (2012) ICTs: Do they contribute to increased carbon emissions? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79(5):919–931
Mundaca G (2017) How much can CO2 emissions be reduced if fossil fuel subsidies are removed? Energy Economics 64:91–104
Nguyen TT, Pham TAT, Tram HTX (2020) Role of information and communication technologies and innovation in driving carbon emissions and economic growth in selected G-20 countries. J Environ Manage 261:110162
Niebel T (2018) ICT and economic growth–comparing developing, emerging and developed countries. World Dev 104:197–211
Ozcan B, Apergis N (2018) The impact of internet use on air pollution: evidence from emerging countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(5):4174–4189
Pablo-Romero MP, Cruz L, Barata E (2017) Testing the transport energy-environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the EU27 countries. Energy Economics 62:257–269
Park Y, Meng F, Baloch MA (2018) The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO 2 emissions: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(30):30708–30719
Sadorsky P (2012) Information communication technology and electricity consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 48:130–136
Salahuddin M, Alam K (2015) Internet usage, electricity consumption and economic growth in Australia: a time series evidence. Telematics Inform 32(4):862–878
Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I (2016) The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a panel investigation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 62:1226–1235
Shabani ZD, Shahnazi R (2019) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: a panel causality analysis. Energy 169:1064–1078
Shahnazi R, Shabani ZD (2019) The effects of spatial spillover information and communications technology on carbon dioxide emissions in Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(23):24198–24212
Ulucak R, Khan SUD (2020) Does information and communication technology affect CO2 mitigation under the pathway of sustainable development during the mode of globalization? Sustain Dev 28(4):857–867
World Bank (2018) World Development Indicator. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/. Accessed 4 Sept 2021
Zhang C, Liu C (2015) The impact of ICT industry on CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 44:12–19
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ben Lahouel, B., Taleb, L., Managi, S. et al. The threshold effects of ICT on CO2 emissions: evidence from the MENA countries. Environ Econ Policy Stud 26, 285–305 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-022-00346-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-022-00346-w
Keywords
- ICT
- CO2 emissions
- Nonlinear econometrics
- Panel smooth transition regression approach
- Regime-switching model
- MENA countries