Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The threshold effects of ICT on CO2 emissions: evidence from the MENA countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to investigate the nonlinear relationship between ICT and CO2 emissions by controlling for economic growth, foreign direct investment, energy consumption, and trade openness. Using data from 16 Middle East and North African (MENA) countries over the period 1990–2019, we apply the Panel Smooth Transition Regression (PSTR) model, as introduced by (González A, Teräsvirta T, vanDijk D (2005) Panel smooth transition regression models. SEE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No. 604), to study the potential regime-switching behavior of the relationship between the variables. The results reveal the existence of a strong regime-switching effect between ICT and CO2 emissions. It was found that after reaching a certain threshold, ICT use and penetration starts to significantly mitigate environmental degradation. Our results show that high levels of ICT not only improve environmental quality but can also be part of the solution to combat the environmental challenges that the MENA region has faced over the past decades. In addition, to account for the potential endogeneity bias, we also develop and estimate a PSTR model with instrumental variables (IV-PSTR) using the approach of (Fouquau et al., Econ Model 25:284–299, 2008). The results obtained confirm those initially found by the PSTR model. The study concludes with policy implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ICT can be measured with either non-monetary (e.g., mobile cellular subscriptions, fixed telephone subscriptions, percentage of individual using the Internet, fixed broadband subscriptions) or monetary variables (e.g., ICT investment, ICT capital stock). Due to the unavailability of monetary data, we limit our selection to non-monetary data (i.e., mobile cellular subscriptions and percentage of individual using the Internet) to make our study comparable to recent studies that used these variables to measure ICT use and penetration.

  2. The PSTR specification procedures are based on the assumption that all variables in Eq. (1) are I(0) stationary in level (González et al., 2005; 2017).

  3. For more details on these two tests, please refer to González et al. (2017).

  4. HAC stands for Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistency.

References

  • Ahmed Z, Le HP (2021) Linking information communication technology, trade globalization index, and CO 2 emissions: evidence from advanced panel techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(7):8770–8781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mulali U, Tang CF, Ozturk I (2015) Does financial development reduce environmental degradation? Evidence from a panel study of 129 countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(19):14891–14900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amri F, Zaied YB, Lahouel BB (2019) ICT, total factor productivity, and carbon dioxide emissions in Tunisia. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 146:212–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Le Roux S, Biekpe N (2017) Environmental degradation, ICT and inclusive development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Policy 111:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu SA, Le Roux S, Biekpe N (2018) Enhancing ICT for environmental sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 127:209–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avom D, Nkengfack H, Fotio HK, Totouom A (2020) ICT and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa: effects and transmission channels. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 155:120028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belaid F, Youssef M (2017) Environmental degradation, renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption, and economic growth: assessing the evidence from Algeria. Energy Policy 102:277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belkhir L, Elmeligi A (2018) Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 and recommendations. J Clean Prod 177:448–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Lahouel B, Ben Zaied Y, Yang GL, Bruna MG, Song Y (2022) A non-parametric decomposition of the environmental performance-income relationship: evidence from a non-linear model. Ann Oper Res 313(1):525–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Lee CC (2020) Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions? Cross-country evidence. J Clean Prod 263:121550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C, Ren X, Dong K, Dong X, Wang Z (2021) How does technological innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in OECD countries? Heterogeneous analysis using panel quantile regression. J Environ Manage 280:111818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu YB, Lee CC (2019) Financial development, income inequality, and country risk. J Int Money Financ 93:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu YB, Lee CC (2020) Effects of financial development on energy consumption: the role of country risks. Energy Economics 90:104833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collard F, Fève P, Portier F (2005) Electricity consumption and ICT in the French service sector. Energy Econ 27(3):541–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colletaz G, Hurlin C (2006) Threshold effects of the public capital productivity: an international panel smooth transition approach. LEO, Université d’Orléans. Working Paper https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00008056/document. Accessed 10 Mar 2022

  • Danish, Baloch MA, Mahmood N, Zhang JW (2019a) Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ 678:632–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish, Zhang J, Wang B, Latif Z (2019b) Towards cross-regional sustainable development: the nexus between information and communication technology, energy consumption, and CO 2 emissions. Sustain Dev 27(5):990–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish (2019) Effects of information and communication technology and real income on CO2 emissions: the experience of countries along Belt and Road. Telematics Inform 45:101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies RB (1987) Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 74(1):33–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou Y, Zhao J, Dong J (2021) Re-estimating the impact of natural gas on global carbon emissions: the role of technological innovation. Front Energy Res 9:62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Katiri L, Fattouh B (2017) A brief political economy of energy subsidies in the Middle East and North Africa. In: Luciani G (ed) Combining economic and political development: the experience of MENA, international development policy series 7. Geneva: Graduate Institute Publications, Boston: Brill-Nijhoff, pp 58–87. https://doi.org/10.4000/poldev.2267. Accessed 1 Sept 2021

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fouquau J, Hurlin C, Rabaud I (2008) The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: A panel smooth transition regression approach. Econ Model 25(2):284–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González A, Terasvirta T, van Dijk D, Yang Y (2017) Panel smooth transition regression models. Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1152759/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2021

  • González A, Terasvirta T, Dijk D (2005) Panel smooth transition regression models. Working paper series in economics and finance, N° 604. Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working, Paper N°3914, NBER, Cambridge MA. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w3914/w3914.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2021

  • Hansen BE (1999) Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. J Econom 93(2):345–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen P, King A (1996) The determinants of health care expenditure: a cointegration approach. J Health Econ 15(1):127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haseeb A, Xia E, Saud S, Ahmad A, Khurshid H (2019) Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? An empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(9):8594–8608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higón DA, Gholami R, Shirazi F (2017) ICT and environmental sustainability: a global perspective. Telematics Inform 34(4):85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilty LM (2007) CO2 reduction with ICT: prospects and barriers. In EnviroInfo 1:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115(1):53–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorisch D, Mallin C, Accurso M, Zaballos AG, Rodríguez EI (2018) Technology for climate action in latin America and the Caribbean: how ICT and mobile solutions contribute to a sustainable, low-carbon future. Washington, DC: IDB. https://doi.org/10.18235/0001184. Accessed 1 September 2021

  • Joyce PJ, Finnveden G, Håkansson C, Wood R (2019) A multi-impact analysis of changing ICT consumption patterns for Sweden and the EU: indirect rebound effects and evidence of decoupling. J Clean Prod 211:1154–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimova A, Rondeau E, Andersson K, Porras J, Rybin A, Zaslavsky A (2016) An international Master’s program in green ICT as a contribution to sustainable development. J Clean Prod 135:223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahouel BB, Taleb L, Zaied YB, Managi S (2021) Does ICT change the relationship between total factor productivity and CO2 emissions? Evidence based on a nonlinear model. Energy Econom 101:105406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom 108(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menichettti E, El Gharras A, Karbuz S (2017) Material factors for the MENA region: energy trends. MENARA working papers, N°5. https://www.cidob.org/en/publications/publication_series/project_papers/menara_papers/working_papers/material_factors_for_the_mena_region_energy_trends. Accessed 1 September 2021

  • Moyer JD, Hughes BB (2012) ICTs: Do they contribute to increased carbon emissions? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79(5):919–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundaca G (2017) How much can CO2 emissions be reduced if fossil fuel subsidies are removed? Energy Economics 64:91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TT, Pham TAT, Tram HTX (2020) Role of information and communication technologies and innovation in driving carbon emissions and economic growth in selected G-20 countries. J Environ Manage 261:110162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niebel T (2018) ICT and economic growth–comparing developing, emerging and developed countries. World Dev 104:197–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan B, Apergis N (2018) The impact of internet use on air pollution: evidence from emerging countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(5):4174–4189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pablo-Romero MP, Cruz L, Barata E (2017) Testing the transport energy-environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the EU27 countries. Energy Economics 62:257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park Y, Meng F, Baloch MA (2018) The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO 2 emissions: an empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(30):30708–30719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadorsky P (2012) Information communication technology and electricity consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 48:130–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Alam K (2015) Internet usage, electricity consumption and economic growth in Australia: a time series evidence. Telematics Inform 32(4):862–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salahuddin M, Alam K, Ozturk I (2016) The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a panel investigation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 62:1226–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabani ZD, Shahnazi R (2019) Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: a panel causality analysis. Energy 169:1064–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahnazi R, Shabani ZD (2019) The effects of spatial spillover information and communications technology on carbon dioxide emissions in Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(23):24198–24212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulucak R, Khan SUD (2020) Does information and communication technology affect CO2 mitigation under the pathway of sustainable development during the mode of globalization? Sustain Dev 28(4):857–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2018) World Development Indicator. Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/. Accessed 4 Sept 2021

  • Zhang C, Liu C (2015) The impact of ICT industry on CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 44:12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Béchir Ben Lahouel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Appendix Tables 5, 6

Table 5 Descriptive statistics of variables used in the PSTR model
Table 6 Pearson correlation

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ben Lahouel, B., Taleb, L., Managi, S. et al. The threshold effects of ICT on CO2 emissions: evidence from the MENA countries. Environ Econ Policy Stud 26, 285–305 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-022-00346-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-022-00346-w

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation