Introduction

Latin America comprises around 20 countries that account for more than 8% of the worldwide population [1]. The region is characterized by important social, cultural, ethnic, and economic differences, which determine significant variabilities in the burden of both infectious and non-transmittable liver diseases [2]. The gross domestic product (GDP) is one of the main economic indicators, and Latin America shows a substantial variability between nations (Table 1). For example, on the one hand, several countries have a GDP lower than USD 2500 per capita, including Haiti, Nicaragua, and Honduras [1]. On the other hand, countries like Costa Rica, Panama, Chile, and Uruguay have a GDP higher than USD 12,000 per capita [1]. Even with the low economic development of some Latin American countries, a recent analysis including 11 nations demonstrated that individuals in absolute poverty dropped from 1 in 3 in 2006 to 1 in 5 by 2019, while income inequality declined substantially over the same period of time [3]. In the same line, life expectancy and access to both drinking water and the Internet improved during this period [3]. Consequently, the differences mentioned above make Latin America a unique region in cultural heritage but determine disparities in health outcomes.

Table 1 Main sociodemographic characteristics and development of liver transplantation in Latin America. Data was obtained from the World Bank Database and the International registry in organ donation and transplantation (IRODaT)

Information about the epidemiology of liver diseases in Latin America is scarce. At present, chronic liver disease represents one of the main burden of disease, and most of the cases in developed countries are explained by alcohol misuse and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), also called metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) [4, 5]. Other relevant etiologies are the hepatotropic viruses, especially in low-income countries with a high prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, affecting individuals of any age and generating a substantial cost in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) [6]. In this context, a proper characterization of epidemiology and healthcare resources in the region represents an opportunity to improve public health through prevention, surveillance, treatments, and education. These opportunities are well described in the literature and validated in several regions worldwide [7, 8]. The present review explores the current challenges that Latin American countries face regarding liver diseases, including the burden of disease, access to care, screening, and treatment needs.

The burden of liver diseases in Latin America

Latin America has 626 million people, who make up 58% of the continent’s population. However, epidemiological data on liver diseases in this region is limited or absent for some countries. As in other parts of the world, non-communicable diseases are the leading cause of mortality in the area, ranging from 62% in Costa Rica to 84% in Chile [9]. Of note, alcohol misuse and, in some countries, gastrointestinal diseases and cirrhosis are among the leading ten causes of DALYs [10]. For example, digestive diseases account for 15.8% of all diseases in Chile, where bile ducts and gallbladder disorders (4.2%), alcohol dependence (3.4%), and cirrhosis (3.3%) are the leading causes [11]. The estimated mortality rate due to cirrhosis in Latin America was 19.9 per 100,000 habitants in 2016 [12]. Unfortunately, the impact of liver disease in Latin America is significant and has increased throughout the entire region during recent years (Fig. 1). Indeed, the prevalence of compensated cirrhosis over the last 30 years increased by 33.2%, while decompensated cirrhosis increased by 54.8% [13].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Impact of liver disease in terms of (A) deaths due to cirrhosis and (B) incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Data was obtained from the Global Burden of Disease database.

Excessive alcohol consumption causes a significant public health problem with devastating consequences, including alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) and alcohol-associated hepatitis [14,15,16]. This is an important cause of chronic liver disease in Latin America and is the leading cause of cirrhosis in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Peru [17]. In fact, the alcohol-attributable fraction of cirrhosis was around 53% [18]. Despite several efforts and public policies, the prevalence of ALD has been increasing during the last decades (Fig. 2A). Thus, the estimated number of deaths from ALD in Latin America was about 54,000 in 2017 [19], and the age-standardized death rate attributable to alcohol was 24 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2015 [18].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Trends in the main causes of chronic liver disease in Latin America between 1990 and 2019: (A) alcohol-related liver disease; (B) non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; (C) hepatitis B virus infection; (D) hepatitis C virus infection. Data was obtained from the Global Burden of Disease database.

NAFLD has an estimated global prevalence rate of 25% worldwide, and its prevalence is more significant and estimated at 31% in the Latin American population [20]. The prevalence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) increased more than any other cause of cirrhosis, and 8–11% of deaths due to cirrhosis were caused by NASH [13]. Few studies reported the NAFLD prevalence from Brazil (35.2%), Chile (23%), Mexico (17%), and Colombia (26.6%). Still, primary data from other Latin American countries are scarce, and most of the studies were performed more than a decade ago [20, 21]. Thus, it is likely that the current NAFLD prevalence is higher in Latin America. Of note, examination of epidemiological figures for obesity and diabetes as indirect estimates of NAFLD prevalence in the region suggest that NAFLD prevalence likely increased in the last decade; however, updated studies are needed (Fig. 2B) [22]. The prevalence of obesity in Latin America is significant, and some countries rank among the most affected worldwide [23]. Epidemiological trends for diabetes are also worrisome, with a very high prevalence in Chile and Mexico (8.6% and 13.5%, respectively) [24].

HBV, HCV, and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infections generate relevant health problems in Latin America. In 2013, the estimated prevalence of HBV chronic infection ranged between 7 and 12 million people [25]. Different transmission routes have been observed among patients from Central and South America, with a higher prevalence between 20 and 40 years old. Evidence supports horizontal transmission as the most common route of infection in adults. Globally, Latin America is a region of intermediately high endemicity of HBV; however, this is dependent on the geographical location, as prevalence is highly variable with areas of low endemicity and others that have high endemicity (such as the Amazon basin region, including northern Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and Venezuela, as well as northwestern Argentina, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic) (Fig. 2C) [26, 27]. Counter to this, the HCV prevalence (estimated by anti-HCV) is low, reaching an overall prevalence of 1.5%, and roughly 70% of cases are due to genotype 1 [28]. Some areas, such as Chile, can have a prevalence as low as 0.2–0.5%, while other regions such as northeast Brazil have a slightly higher prevalence estimated at 1.7–3.4% (Fig. 2D) [29, 30].

The reports of HDV prevalence are scarce in Latin America. Notably, the infection is not restricted to risk groups, and it has been associated mostly with acute liver failure (ALF). In areas of northern Brazil, in the western Amazon region, many acute and chronic infections have been reported, where severe epidemics of HDV have affected this population, rapidly evolving to cirrhosis or death [31, 32]. A recent systematic review including 31 studies demonstrated that HDV prevalence among hepatitis B virus carriers was 22.37% in South America [33]. However, there was a substantial decline in HDV prevalence during the last decades.

Likewise, few epidemiological reports exist on autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and other autoimmune liver diseases in Latin America. A recent Chilean cohort study demonstrated that AIH constitutes a frequent cause of liver transplantation (LT), with a prevalence of 13% in adult candidates [34]. In addition, a Peruvian study determined that between 4 and 6% of adult, LT in this country are secondary to AIH [35], while in Argentina, it corresponds to the second most common cause of ALF (25% of the cases) [36].

Risk factors for liver diseases in Latin America

Multiple factors are associated with liver diseases, especially those related to ALD, NAFLD, and the pathogenesis of cirrhosis. Notably, the high prevalence of liver diseases in Latin America is influenced by genetic factors, the elevated prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome, and environmental factors such as diet, low exercise, and excessive alcohol intake.

Genetic factors

Several genes have been identified to be associated with liver disease. Particularly, Patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein (PNPLA3) nonsynonymous gene variant (rs738409 c.444 C > G p.I148M) is the most studied genetic polymorphism shown to be robustly associated with steatosis, steatohepatitis, and fibrosis in patients with NAFLD [37]. Interestingly, a high prevalence of p.I148M has been observed in the general population in Latin America. An allelic frequency of the high-risk allele G of 59% in the general population has been reported in Chile, whereas in Argentina, the GG genotype of PNPLA3 rs738409 was present in 63.7% of individuals [38, 39]. In ALD, genetic factors are also associated with the onset and progression of the disease. For example, genetic polymorphisms among Amerindian populations in Mexico would increase the predisposition and severity of ALD [40, 41], similar to what was observed in the USA in the Hispanic ancestry population [42, 43]. The PNPLA3 polymorphisms, which are highly prevalent in the general Latin American population, would also play a vital role in ALD. Subjects carrying PNPLA3 have an increased risk of ALD and progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [44, 45]. A higher risk has been observed in subjects with the GG genotype than in the CC genotype (which had the four-fold risk of having ALD) [46]. Also, the TM6SF2 and MBOAT7 genes, related to lipid metabolic processes, confer risk for severe ALD [47, 48]. The TM6SF2, like PNPLA3, would have a role in the modulation of hepatic fat accumulation, fibrosis, and HCC development [49]. On the other hand, the MBOAT7 polymorphism is mainly associated with the generation of fibrosis [50].

Obesity, overweight, and metabolic syndrome

The increasing prevalence of obesity and overweight, known risk factors for liver diseases, in Latin America poses a major public health challenge to the region [51]. In recent years, the prevalence of obesity in Latin America has been increasing faster than in the rest of the world, being more critical in people of low socioeconomic status [52]. Currently, the prevalence of obesity in Latin America is among the highest globally. This situation is more complex in children and adolescents, where one in five is overweight or obese [52]. The transition from a predominantly underweight population to one that is overweight and obese has been remarkably rapid in Latin America; this has been associated with changes in food systems and living environments characterized by greater availability, accessibility, and affordability of ultra-processed foods, as well as an increase in sedentary lifestyle [53]. The countries with the highest prevalence of obesity are Mexico (20.6% in men, 32.7% in women), Chile (22% in men, 30.3% in women), Costa Rica (15.4% in men, 28.8% in women), and Uruguay (23.3% in men, 25.4% in women) [23]. Metabolic syndrome is another relevant risk factor for liver diseases that exhibit high prevalence rates (between 25 and 37%) in Latin America [54, 55]. The recent Cardiovascular Risk Factor Multiple Evaluation in Latin America (CARMELA) study found a global prevalence of metabolic syndrome of 21% [56]. The most affected cities were Mexico City (27%), Barquisimeto (26%), Santiago (21%), and Bogota (20%), and the cities with the lowest prevalence were Lima (18%), Buenos Aires (17%), and Quito (14%) [56]. Physical inactivity plays a fundamental role as a contributor to obesity and overweight and is highly prevalent in the region. Latin America corresponds to the area with the highest sedentary lifestyles globally, with a prevalence rate of insufficient physical activity of 32% [57]. This situation is also problematic in teenagers since only 15% of adolescents are physically active [58].

Alcohol consumption

It is critical to consider the role of alcohol consumption in this region as a predominant risk factor for liver disease. In Latin America, the harmful consumption of alcohol represents a significant health, social, and economic burden. More than 50% of people ≥ 15 years of age are current drinkers, and this prevalence has increased in recent years and is the leading cause responsible for almost 60% of cirrhosis. The estimated per capita consumption in Latin America was 6.84 L of pure alcohol in 2016, which was higher than the average consumption worldwide [12]. Men have a higher prevalence of alcohol use disorder (AUD) than women (8% vs. 2%, respectively), a phenomenon that is similar to other regions [4, 12]. In addition, low and lower-middle-income countries have the highest AUD prevalence, even with lesser alcohol consumption than countries with higher income [59, 60].

Incidence and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 85% of primary liver cancers worldwide, being the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in 2020, with 830,000 deaths, of which 4.6% occurred in Latin America (Fig. 1B) [61]. Both incidence and mortality are twice as high in men as in women [62]. The mortality due to HCC across the region ranges from less than 2.8 to more than 6.3 per 100,000 inhabitants, similar to other parts of the world. The ratio between incidence and mortality is close to 1, confirming the high lethality of HCC in the region. In fact, HCC is the leading cause of death due to cancer in Guatemala [61]. Most cases are diagnosed before age 50, with devastating consequences in DALYs [63].

The most frequent causes of HCC in Latin America are HCV and ALD [63]. However, HBV is the leading cause in Brazil and Peru (38% and 34%, respectively). An Argentinean cohort study demonstrated that HCV was the main etiology of HCC between 2009 and 2016. However, at the end of the study period, an increase in NASH as the etiology of HCC was seen up to 6 times. These results show a trend and projection of an increase in HCC due to NAFLD, similar to that described in North America [62, 64].

Several studies in HCC consistently report a high proportion of advanced stages at the moment of diagnosis (20–41%) [63]. Also, a substantial number of cases are diagnosed outside of surveillance programs. Indeed, data obtained from a South American retrospective cohort that included 14 centers in six countries showed that only 47% of HCC cases were carried out through surveillance programs. The latter is relevant since incidental diagnosis (outside the context of HCC screening) is associated with increased mortality compared to those diagnosed via surveillance [63].

Acute liver failure in Latin America: a critical situation

ALF is an entity characterized by severe acute or subacute temporary liver damage in patients without a prior history of chronic liver disease, with high associated morbidity and mortality. The most common manifestations of ALF are hepatic encephalopathy and prolonged coagulation time, as a manifestation of severe liver dysfunction. ALF is caused by various etiologies such as viral infections, autoimmunity, drug-induced liver injury (DILI), acute vascular liver disease, or pregnancy-related diseases.

There is limited information available regarding the etiologies of ALF in Latin America. A Brazilian retrospective study including candidates from 12 centers showed that 325 (5.4%) patients were secondary to ALF (2006–2015). Among the main etiologies in adults, 34% were cryptogenic, 26% DILI, 18% AIH, 8% HBV, 6% Wilson’s disease, 4% Hepatitis A virus (HAV), 1% acetaminophen overdose, and 1% acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Regarding DILI, the most frequent drugs related were anti-tuberculosis regimens with isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide (21%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (21%), antibiotics (19%), along with other reports with phenytoin, venlafaxine, and propylthiouracil, among others [65]. In Argentina, a registry-based retrospective study carried out between 1998 and 2016 and including 363 adult patients transplanted due to ALF showed that the main etiology was cryptogenic in 103 cases (28.3%), followed by AIH (25%), HBV (17%), non-acetaminophen DILI (14%), and HAV 1.1% [36].

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is an important cause of admission and mortality. In Chile, a preliminary retrospective cohort study included 334 patients between 2017 and 2019 [66]. Patients with ACLF were younger and had higher MELD-Na and APACHE II on admission vs. decompensated cirrhotics without ACLF. In this cohort, the most common triggers were infections (42.4%), gastrointestinal bleeding (23.2%), and alcohol (31.3%), and the leading organ failures were kidney (60.2%) and brain (49.3%). The cumulative survival at 180 days was 58.3% in ACLF (p = 0.004), with significantly higher mortality in ACLF grade 2 and ACLF grade 3 when compared with patients without ACLF (HR 2.3 and 2.99, respectively; p < 0.05). Also, the risk of mortality or transplantation was higher in ACLF grade 2 and ACLF-3 than patients without ACLF (HR 2.19 and 4.61, respectively; p < 0.05) [66].

Socioeconomic differences, healthcare access, and treatments among Latin American countries

There are significant wealth disparities between countries, while some countries reach high positions on the gross domestic product (GDP) or the Human development index rankings; others place at the bottom of those rankings [1, 67]. Overall, Latin America has increased healthcare expenditure from 7.2% GDP in 2012 to 8% GDP in 2018 [1]. However, the current health expenditure as a percentage of GDP ranges from 11.2% (Cuba) to 3.5% (Venezuela) and is lower than the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) average (12.4%)[1].

During the last three decades, several Latin American countries have implemented social and health sector reforms to achieve universal healthcare access and coverage and address social inequities. Unfortunately, the disparities persist across Latin American countries, and health systems are still deeply fragmented [68,69,70]. Consequently, healthcare access is still limited by several factors, such as educational level, rural status, or ethnicity [71]. Also, high out-of-pocket expenditure and financial vulnerability and delay in new technologies incorporation are still challenging to be overcome [72, 73]. Access to advanced treatments is a particular issue for liver disease care. Recent progress in HCC and viral hepatitis care may not be available to a significant proportion of patients who live in deprived or rural areas [74, 75]. For example, in the GIDEON study, fewer patients with HCC from Latin America received TACE before sorafenib initiation versus the global cohort [75, 76]. Also, Latin American countries have some differences in sorafenib cost, but almost all (except for Brazil) pay higher prices than high-income European countries [77]. There are some opportunities to cope with these issues: cost-effectiveness analyses and health technology assessment, collective negotiation, and the use of generics and biosimilars through the flexibility of patent laws [78]. Lastly, the recent COVID-19 pandemic is a new threat for Latin America structurally stressed health systems. The impact in liver disease control, such as direct-acting antiviral and HCC screening coverages, is still forthcoming.

Liver transplantation in Latin America

Despite major economic limitations in Latin America and the lack of effective immunosuppressive drugs, the first LT was performed in 1968 in Brazil and 1969 in Chile [79]. In recent years, medical knowledge and surgical expertise have improved LT outcomes in Latin America, reaching a post-LT survival comparable to other regions of the world. For example, a Chilean nationwide cohort exhibited a 1-year post-LT survival of 84% [34]. Also, an Argentinean study showed that 1-month post-LT survival rates improved from 70 to 82% in the last 20 years, with a consistently associated reduction in wait-list mortality from 27 to 19% [36]. Furthermore, a Peruvian study demonstrated a 5-year survival after LT was 90.9%, while the 5-year graft survival was 95.5% [80]. However, differences among countries could be due to indication of LT, the severity of the liver disease before LT, and under-recording of deaths. The cause for LT follows the same trend in Latin America as in other western countries. For example, NAFLD-related cirrhosis is a growing indication for LT. In fact, it actually constitutes the main etiology of LT in Chile [34]. NAFLD-related cirrhosis was also the third etiology of underlying disease in HCC candidates for LT [81]. At the same time, the percentage of LT for HCV has declined in the last decades due to the extended use of effective antiviral regimens [82].

There are important barriers to donation, enhanced by inadequate financial and legislative support [83]. Regrettably, the donor rate is extremely low in most Latin American countries compared to Europe or North America, and there are dramatic differences between countries in the region (Table 1). For example, Argentina and Brazil perform more than 10 LT per million of the population (PMP) while countries like Venezuela, Dominican Republic, Paraguay, and Bolivia have around 0.2–0.4 PMP [84]. Moreover, LT is not routinely performed in six countries of Central America, including Guatemala, Trinidad y Tobago, Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Haiti (Table) [85]. The main consequence of the low donor rate is the excessive dropout (progression or death) on the waitlist, which remains high despite the income level. For example, the dropout among Chilean candidates is 37.6% in adults and 22.1% in the pediatric population [34, 86].

An equitable allocation of donated organs to patients who need them the most on the waiting list is crucial. Initially, the liver allocation policy in most countries of Latin America was based on a patient’s location of care and time on the waiting list [83]. However, the social and political requests for a better allocation system, focusing on the severity of underlying liver disease, led to the implementation of an allocation policy based on the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score in countries like Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, and Chile [85]. Unfortunately, this new policy has not changed the waiting list mortality [34, 87]. Many important legal issues must be modified or implemented to address the problem [88], for example, brain death diagnosis criteria, the type of consent for retrieval, restrictions for living unrelated donation to avoid donor manipulation, medical criteria for allocation, and a clear prohibition of organ commercialization. One important advancement has been creating a presumed donor law wherein patients must explicitly opt-out of being organ donors [85]. However, cultural attitudes and beliefs in these countries, different organ donation legislation and the lack of a robust donor and overall health care organizational structure in Latin America are impediments to transplantation as a whole [89,90,91].

Unmet needs in liver diseases and future perspectives

A transversal limitation in LA is poor healthcare access and appropriate treatment. The lack of laws and resources limits the access to the improvements to therapy, research, education, and continuous medical training, limiting the ability to expand knowledge and generate data promoting a constant improvement of medical care [63]. Thus, the most critical barriers to decreasing the burden of liver diseases include lack of well-structured screening programs, absence of early identification of the population at risk of liver diseases (such as those with chronic HBV or HCV infection), ineffective application of routine HCC surveillance throughout the region, the lack of a robust and integrated health care system to treat and follow-up patients, and poor access in rural areas [63, 92]. For example, in a study including most countries from South America, only 54% of patients diagnosed with HCC were under surveillance [93]. Moreover, adherence to clinical guideline recommendations can be as low as 62%, and 41.2% of patients with HCV have not received direct-acting antiviral agents [94, 95].

As ALD is the main cause of cirrhosis in LA, excessive alcohol consumption should be actively sought to limit and regulated [14, 96]. A recent ecological study showed that the establishment of public health policies on alcohol consumption in LA is extremely heterogeneous; however, a higher number of public policies was associated with lower mortality due to ALD and AUD prevalence [12]. Interestingly, higher mortality of alcohol-related health consequences has been described in low-income countries, despite a lower alcohol consumption than countries with a higher income [97]. Therefore, it is especially relevant to implement robust and tailored measures to address alcohol misuse and its consequences [18, 60]. In addition, there are no specific public health policies on NAFLD in the Americas, which is similar to the situation of other world regions [98]. Thus, it is important to promote public health policies and raise awareness of the main risk factors for liver disease in Latin America [51, 60].

The lack of LT programs in many parts of the region generates important disparities in the management of advanced liver diseases. This point is critical since most cirrhotic patients may be undertreated due to the lack of LT availability. As the rate of LT carried out per million people is mainly correlated with the GDP, none of the Latin American countries classified as lower middle income (Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala, and Bolivia) can maintain LT programs [99]. This could be partially addressed through a higher allocation of resources and advanced training opportunities for healthcare teams.

Among proposed solutions, it is essential to perform well‐designed prevalence studies and reliable registries to better understand the prevalence of liver diseases in every Latin American country [100]. Secondly, better screening methods should be implemented to the population with well‐known risk factors [101]. Moreover, pharmaceutical companies should allow low‐ and middle‐income countries to access new treatments at lower costs or generic versions of the same [100]. Also, implementing measures that have proved to be effective in reducing alcohol consumption such as restricting easy access to alcohol, advertising, and specific pricing regulations are also recommended [18]. Finally, improving medical education and clinical research through better government funding and regional and international collaborations would predictably impact care of liver diseases in the region [51, 102].

Conclusions

Latin America is a multicultural region with important differences in socioeconomic status and healthcare access. Alcohol misuse and HBV infection were important causes of liver disease. However, sedentary lifestyles, broader access to highly processed foods, and a sustained increase in the prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the region have determined a shift, with NAFLD becoming a leading cause of chronic liver disease, especially in developed countries. Socioeconomic differences and inequities greatly influence the development, quality, and access to screening and treatment for liver diseases. Strong efforts and public policies should be encouraged to decrease the burden of liver diseases in LA.